Spending all that tax money to show “no negative effects” does not account for the negative effects to my pocketbook!
Would “no negative effects” be the same as “positive effects?”
Watson is not the only one, is he? I heard that Arnold Palmer was quite the ladies man in his day (and his "day" lasted decades).
Think about this from the article above:
the auditors . . . suggested it might be better to keep the material...
I kind of like “empty areas,” Countyman. Others just see woodlands as areas yet to be paved.