Court voids Ga. left turn law

Monday, June 8, 2009 10:26 AM
Last updated 3:55 PM
  • Follow Latest News

ATLANTA - Making a left turn sounds simple enough. But after considering a lawsuit by a frustrated motorist, Georgia's Supreme Court says the state traffic law governing left turns is so baffling that it violates the constitution.

Georgia's mystifying left-hand rule was struck down Monday by the state's top court.

The Supreme Court's unanimous finding that the law is "unconstitutionally vague" does not bind other states, but it could embolden other challenges. About 75 percent of states use an identical statute, according to an analysis by attorney Ben Goldberg, who filed the challenge on behalf of the aggrieved driver.

At the center of the argument is rambling language that has been a part of the traffic code in Georgia — and other states — for decades:

"Whenever practicable, the left turn shall be made to the left of the center of the intersection and so as to leave the intersection or other location in the extreme left-hand lane lawfully available to traffic moving in the same direction as such vehicle on the roadway being entered."

Local prosecutors say the meaning is simple: Drivers making a left turn must turn into the inside lane.

"It may be somewhat less than clear to someone that doesn't read law, but it makes perfectly good sense if you stop and read it," said Whitfield County District Attorney Kermit McManus, whose office handled the case.

He said the court's "strained" interpretation of the law could become a safety issue if the law allows people taking left turns to take the same lane as those motorists taking right turns onto the same road.

But Goldberg, a public defender in Dalton, said the left-turn law is too complicated for the average motorist — let alone an attorney — to pick up on its meaning.

"It's like reading another language," said Goldberg.

The appeal stemmed from a routine traffic stop in 2007 when a police officer pulled Todd Christopher McNair over after he turned into the outer, right-hand lane instead of the inner, left-lane closer to the oncoming traffic.

McNair did not immediately respond Monday to requests for comment through his attorney. Two phone numbers listed for him were disconnected.

McNair was charged with making an improper left turn as well as driving under the influence and obstruction of a law enforcement officer. He spent the next four months in jail because his probation in an unrelated case was revoked because of the new charges.

A jury in March 2008 acquitted him of the more serious charges, but found him guilty of making the illegal left turn. He was sentenced to 12 months probation, a $500 fine, 100 hours of community service and drug and alcohol counseling.

McNair and his attorney appealed the case after discovering the left-turn issue hadn't reached the state's top court before. People may have always been confused about the law, but no one ever bothered to challenge it, said Mike McCarthy, who heads the local public defenders office.

"Only a public defender's office can bring this challenge — unless someone is loaded and didn't care about spending the money," McCarthy said.

The left-turn law has been challenged with less luck in other states. An identical statute in Kansas was upheld in 1991 by that state's Court of Appeals, although it conceded the language is "not well written."

The Georgia court's unanimous ruling, penned by Presiding Justice Carol Hunstein, struck down the law on grounds it is so vague that a person of "common intelligence" is forced to guess at its meaning.

For Goldberg, it's one more step toward making the left turn a little less confusing.

"There are a lot of traffic laws, and as an attorney reading them I have trouble understanding what they say," said Goldberg. "As citizens, we're all entitled to be able to understand exactly what the government mandates."

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
jack 06/08/09 - 12:18 pm
I would have to agree with

I would have to agree with the officer. It seems it is that way every state I have lived in and Germany/Europe.

mad_max 06/08/09 - 01:22 pm
That was the one thing I got

That was the one thing I got dinged for on my first road test. Of course, that was back when drivers were required to know and obey the laws. You know, who goes first at a 4-way stop sign, slower traffic keep to the right lane, no passing on the right, use turn signals BEFORE changing lanes, no sliding and gliding across multiple lanes, and other common sense type things that were part of the traffic law before we had to dumb down the tests.

Daddyrabbit 06/08/09 - 04:46 pm
Everyone should be sure to

Everyone should be sure to remember his name. In today's world if accidents are caused by him getting this law stricken down he could possibly be held responsible for it. It seems like he's been in trouble before and has some money to throw away. No matter what he has, the insurance companies have more. It isn't vague and complicated, but, it is commen sense. Maybe he was also in a hurry and wanted to pass someone.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs