Cancer begs for year-round awareness

  • Follow Letters

Amanda Matherson's Oct. 29 letter regarding breast cancer awareness vs. just cancer awareness ("Include all cancers in awareness month") raised some wonderful points. Because cancer is so broad, it is difficult to have an entire month dedicated to only one type.

However, I think that creating a generalized cancer awareness month could almost do just the opposite -- it wouldn't allow general public exposure to specifics in a broad scope. A monthlong dedication to just one lends itself to this type specifically. Breast cancer affects one in eight women during their lives, and kills more women in the United States than any cancer except lung cancer.

When you aren't exposed to cancer, it's hard to imagine its effects. One of my 34-year-old college friends has just been treated for breast cancer, which was a terrible shock for someone so young.

Unfortunately, I've had quite a bit of personal exposure to cancer, and a type that also doesn't have its own month. My father, E. Owen Perry III, fought a hard fight against bladder cancer, beat it once and then had it return just a year and a half later.

Like Ms. Matherson, I'd also be thrilled with some broader media focus on cancer. But I think because cancer is so huge, a media focus on one type such as breast cancer promotes needed awareness, in turn encouraging a look at all things cancer.

Outside of awareness months, it's the media's responsibility to build public awareness of cancer, a disease that greatly affects about 11.1 million Americans, according to the American Cancer Society's most recent figures. The CSRA is so fortunate to have great oncology care such as at Doctors Hospital's Cancer Care Center, but it is the media's responsibility to make us aware of these things on a regular basis, and not only during an awareness month.

Laura Perry

Augusta

(The writer is a Doctors Hospital Cancer Care Center volunteer.)

Comments

soldout

It is as important to be looking for a cure as it is for a drug to cure. Those are two different approaches and both should be done. American cancer society's goal should be to have to shut down for lack of a need. That would be real progress. In all disease greater progress would be made if more time was spent studying the healthy rather than the sick. In all other aspects of life we study the successful in order to make improvements in our lives; so the research also needs to look at those that don't get cancer. The best answers are always simple and inexpensive because God wants us well and He never intended for that to be complex for us to do.

matherson

I think you missed the point I was trying to put across. When you say that it is the media's job to bring awareness to all cancers, I was simply stating they don't. They bring all the focus around breast cancer specifically. Even though breast cancer is the number one cancer killer of women and sometimes men, I don't think that makes all other cancers less important. Less people are diagnosed with other cancers, but those cancers can be five times more deadly.
I am Amanda Matherson, the 14 year old granddaughter, of a Multiple Myeloma cancer victim. Who, coincidentally, passed away at the hospital you volunteer at. When diagnosed, they gave him 2 years, and he fought through 10 painful years. Only 3% of Multiple Myeloma cancer patients live up to that expectancy, but people may not know that because it's not publicized like breast cancer.

Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...