Letter to the Editor
Why did President Obama win the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize? Why are the Republicans and The Chronicle screaming foul? There are myriad reasons why the president was awarded the prize.
Let's start by the European view of America during the eight years of the Bush administration. They saw an administration that not only lied to Americans, but lied to the world about weapons of mass destruction and a need to invade Iraq.
How disappointed they were that President Bush carried on a unilateral view, as expressed by his ambassador to the United Nations, that America must care for itself and not the rest of the world. How disappointed they were that Bush had little interest in the Israeli and Palestinian problem. In fact, at his first Cabinet meeting he stated that they should fight it out for themselves.
The atmosphere he, Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld created was a militant stance to which all others should bow down. This is what the Republican Congress loved, and unfortunately it led to the death of thousands of Americans and allies.
President Obama was elected on very different terms. The terms were to talk first instead of shooting first. The cowboy image of Bush faded fast, and the image of a peaceful America rose out of the chaos that Bush created.
The Republicans criminalized Obama for winning the prize, saying he hasn't done anything. What they ignored was the world-view of a responsible president heading a country that the world can look up to again, and a man who has given them the most important elements of our futures -- hope for peace and a better quality of life.
Lowell Greenbaum
Augusta
(The writer is chairman of the Richmond County Democratic Party.)