Hate crime bill would raise penalties for attacks

  • Follow Metro

COLUMBIA --- The middle of a recession may be an unlikely time to tackle hate-crime legislation in South Carolina, but advocates of a bill to increase penalties for assaulting the homeless say now is the time.

In May, Rep. Wendell Gilliard, a Charleston Democrat, introduced a bill that would make the attack on a homeless person a hate crime punishable by up to one year in prison for a second offense -- on top of the underlying penalty for assault.

Comprehensive hate-crime legislation in South Carolina has died year after year.

But Rep. Seth Whipper, a co-sponsor of Mr. Gilliard's bill, said the changing makeup of the General Assembly could make this year different and lead to incremental steps to include other groups under hate-crime protection.

South Carolina had 127 hate crimes in 2007, nearly tripling from 2000, according to the FBI's annual hate crimes statistics report. The data includes crimes in which the victim was targeted because of race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity/national origin and disability.

Federal law defines a hate crime as one in which the victim was singled out because of race, color, religion or national origin.

Greg Foster, the spokesman for the speaker of the House, said he was unfamiliar with Mr. Gilliard's bill.

"I can tell you that when session starts in January our number one focus needs to be the economy," Mr. Foster said. "Having the third-worst unemployment rate in the country is simply not acceptable."

But Mr. Whipper said the recession underscores the need for South Carolina to foster a warm climate for diversity in order to compete globally.

"No one should be victimized based on some characteristics that the Lord gave them or some circumstances they could not avoid," he said.

South Carolina, Georgia, Indiana, Arkansas and Wyoming are the only states that have no hate-crime legislation, according to the Human Rights Campaign.

Comments

patriciathomas

"Federal law defines a hate crime as one in which the victim was singled out because of race, color, religion or national origin." What a stupid comment. A hate crime must be based on mind reading so the arresting officer can tell what the accused criminal was thinking at the time of the crime. Who determines if the arresting officer can read minds? Are only "certain races" going to be capable of committing hate crimes? This is a law that requires you to be emotionless during the commission of a crime or you'll be punished.

colcamp1

If you cannot determine the difference between a random act of violence and one that is premeditated and based of a person race, religion or sexual orientation, then you are not as smart as you claim to be?

patriciathomas

It's easy to tell what I'm thinking when I read your 6:25 post.

jackfruitpaper833

If a lot more people were born again and washed in the blood of the Lamb, hate wouldn't be in their hearts. I've often wondered why when a racist get's old and feeble he/she suddenly changes their mind and starts to like black, jews and other races, is it because they are near death? or maybe Christ finally came into his/her life?

ladyjanegrey

how about all that hate in your heart jackie?

rufus

It would be hard to define murder as a love crime

jack

Just what should we do when we are virtually attacked by these homeless people who are aggressive in demanding money? Seems that only whites can commit such crimes from what I have seen in the courts.

jackfruitpaper833

Because jack 95% of that hate is TAUGHT to white kids at an early age, so when it finally sets into their minds and they seise an opportunity to act on it (hoping they don't get caught) most do it. One thing I've noticed, most of these hate groups aren't acting out as one body against people. Why because laws are in place and people are arming themselves ready for that kind of mess.

patriciathomas

Please try to make your comments a little more sensible, fruit. You always seem so hate filled.

KSL

I hope this bill does not pass. Think about the unintended consequences. Imagine a homeless person aggressively harassing someone for a handout because he knows that his victim can be charged with a hate crime for defending himself.

mad_max

Ever know of anyone prosecuted under a hate crime law for beating or killing a white person? I guess those are just ordinary beatings and killings. No hate involved there huh? Have you EVER heard a sheriff say "Well we are looking at the killing of this white man as a possible hate crime"? Hate crime laws are ridiculous. A crime is a crime and if it is a beating or killing I assume "severe dislike" was involved. Whether hate is involved is subjective and irrelevant. Is it okay to kill if it is only "severe dislike" as opposed to "hate"? Can you draw that line for me and tell me who can make that call?

Taylor B

Hate crime legislation punishes thought, which is unconstitutional and hard to prove at best. Plus, what about crimes against the rich? They are a "class" of people... right?

corgimom

I don't agree with hate crime legislation, because we already have laws about assault. It's an unnecessary law.

bone

i hate hate crimes; is that a hate crime?

Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...