Validity of Clemson rankings questioned

  • Follow Metro

A Clemson University staffer has accused the South Carolina school of manipulating its U.S. News & World Report ranking -- reviving a debate over what critics call the pernicious influence of the magazine's annual college ratings.

Among the steps reportedly alleged by Catherine Watt, who until 2006 headed Clemson's institutional research office: Clemson manipulated class sizes, artificially boosted faculty salary data and gave rival schools low grades in the rankings' peer reputation survey, which counts for 25 percent of the score.

Ms. Watt said Thursday that reports on her remarks had missed the point of her presentation to a conference and that she regretted any suggestion of illegal activity. Meanwhile, the university denied several of the allegations, but acknowledged it aims to improve in the influential rankings. Clemson jumped from No. 38 among public universities in 2001 to No. 22 in 2008 -- an unusually quick ascent considering the rankings typically change little from year to year.

"It's misguided and it's educationally damaging," Lloyd Thacker, the executive director of the Education Conservancy and a prominent rankings critic, said of the allegations. "Colleges have been 'rank-steering,' -- driving under the influence of the rankings," he said. "We've seen over the years a shifting of resources to influence ranks."

Ms. Watt's comments came Tuesday in Atlanta at a meeting of the Association for Institutional Research -- usually a staid venue for discussions about data collection. However, Ms. Watt dropped a bombshell, detailing Clemson's single-minded pursuit to become a Top 20 public research university, according to reports from The Chronicle of Higher Education and Inside Higher Ed .

Ms. Watt, now director of the Alliance for Research on Higher Education at Clemson's Strom Thurmond Institute, described practices many rankings critics believe are common, but rarely acknowledge. Clemson, she said, "walked a fine line between illegal, unethical and really interesting."

U.S. News students; last year it reported 48 percent did.

Most explosively, she reportedly claimed Clemson officials ranked other institutions as "below average" in the magazine's peer reputation survey. She reportedly later clarified that Clemson administrators had not been told to do that, but their surveys "had that effect."

Clemson issued a three-page response that didn't name Ms. Watt but called the reported statements "outrageous."

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
marlowe969 06/05/09 - 09:23 am
As Gomer would say, "Shame,

As Gomer would say, "Shame, shame, shame." The Clemson Tiger's tail is tucked between his tail this morning....

marlowe969 06/05/09 - 09:24 am
His tail is tucked between

His tail is tucked between his legs, I should have said!

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs
Top headlines
Hyde Park activist not pleased with city buyout offer
Charles Utley, who fought to get Augusta to address contamination concerns in the Hyde Park community, now is questioning the city's offer of $90,500 for his four rental properties there.