Hopes fade for reform bill

  • Follow Metro

COLUMBIA --- Efforts to change the voting process in South Carolina have provoked plenty of angst and pages of legislation, but the prospect that voters will see any changes next election is increasingly cloudy.

Lawmakers continue to argue about the motives behind the dozens of proposals, but at least one thing is clear: The electoral process has gotten more attention this year than usual.

South Carolina's legislature introduced 60 election-reform bills this year, more than any year since 2001, according to data maintained by the National Conference of State Legislatures. The proposals are targeting everything from how to validate petition signatures and how many signatures there should be, to early voting and the number of early-voting centers and whether a photo ID should be required.

South Carolina is among roughly a dozen states that does not allow early in-person voting.

On Thursday a Senate subcommittee approved H. 3418, a bill to require a specific type of photo ID, such as a passport or one issued by the DMV. The bill was amended to also create a 15-day no-excuse early voting period. The subcommittee's lone Democrat and early-voting advocate, Sen. John Scott of Columbia, tried to disentangle the two pieces. He ended up voting against the bill when his effort was rejected.

"The effort here is to try to find some consensus, to find some blending of these two proposals of early voting and voter ID," said Sen. Chip Campsen, R-Charleston, who led the subcommittee.

In February, members of the Legislative Black Caucus and some white Democrats protested the photo-ID bill and called it a return to segregation-era tactics to prevent blacks from voting.

The NAACP, League of Women Voters, American Civil Liberties Union and AARP have all opposed the photo-ID bill on the grounds that it creates obstacles to voting.

"This appears to be a solution in search of a problem," said Victoria Middleton, head of South Carolina's ACLU chapter.

Democrats called the bill and a host of other Republican proposals a backlash against President Obama's victory in November and the crowds of first-time voters.

"There's no question that's what you're seeing," said Rep. Karl Allen, D-Greenville. "You saw this all over the nation, an increase in the number of people exercising their right to vote. If you want to stifle that ... you put restrictions that hopefully will give you some advantage and diminish the turnout."

House Majority Leader Kenny Bingham, R-Cayce, said his caucus is trying to make sure only the people who are registered to vote cast ballots.

"We felt like on our side of the aisle, it was a simple request," he said, adding that a photo ID is required to board a plane, cash a check, access your bank account and buy Sudafed.

"When you're talking about electing the president of the United States, we feel like it's a reasonable request," he said.

As for the bill's chances, now that a Senate subcommittee tacked on the early-voting measure, Mr. Bingham noted that House lawmakers separated the two issues so they wouldn't get bogged down in disagreements.

"If the Senate has not even got it through full committee, it's going to be hard for them to get three readings and to get it back to the House," he said.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Reality
3
Points
Reality 05/11/09 - 04:56 am
0
0
No photo ID, than you

No photo ID, than you shouldn't get a vote.

justus4
101
Points
justus4 05/11/09 - 08:08 am
0
0
This is an attempt to deny
Unpublished

This is an attempt to deny particular citizens the right to vote, by placing barriers to voting. These propals are design to deter democrat votes. It's that simple. Exposing these "tricks" is the NAACP, ACLU, and other agencies' biggest job because these guys are overreaching. Wow!

InChristLove
22473
Points
InChristLove 05/11/09 - 09:11 am
0
0
Please tell me how requiring

Please tell me how requiring proper identification is denying a citizen the right to vote. It's like the article says, you have to have an ID to board a plane, cash a check, access your bank account. How is that a barrier?

Garfield10
0
Points
Garfield10 05/11/09 - 10:15 pm
0
0
Getting the photo ID required

Getting the photo ID required in this bill requires a valid birth certificate. What if you were born at home instead of a hospital? No birth certificate. Getting one can be costly, requiring the Bureau of the Census to search for the person in the correct census years. In my case, nearly 20 years ago it cost $40. It probably would be $100 now, creating a poll tax. I've talked to my representatives about it, but they put nothing in the bill to avoid this "poll tax."

I chose to pay the money to get a birth certificate in order to get a passport. Nobody should have to pay for a birth certificate in order to be able to vote. I've talked to my representatives and suggested that they give the required photo IDs to people who had been voting for 40 or more years, but they were not interested in mitigating the cost for the elderly and poor.

Also, this bill is a solution in search of a problem. There has not been any recorded instance of anyone voting illegally. What this bill does is attempt to keep the elderly and the poor from voting.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs