Homes clear safety check

  • Follow Metro

Nineteen mobile homes once thought toxic might soon get Columbia County approval for residential use.

State and county officials have expressed concerns that the trailers, located at the Arrowood Mobile Home Park on Wrightsboro Road, were among those scrapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency because they contained toxic levels of formaldehyde.

A test conducted by New York-based Arrowood owner KDM Development Corp. through an independent agency showed, however, that the trailers met safety regulations, said Columbia County Development Services Director Richard Harmon.

"The laboratory analysis for formaldehyde indicate that all the samples are well below the 0.1 parts per mil- lion that the U.S. (Environmental Protection Agency) considers elevated," Mr. Harmon read from a letter sent to his office this week by KDM Development.

FEMA supplied the trailers as temporary housing for those displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Government tests later found dangerous levels of formaldehyde, a preservative commonly used in building materials, in many of the trailers.

In addition, the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development has been unable to provide documentation showing that the 19 trailers in Columbia County are uninhabitable, Mr. Harmon said.

"We have no information from the state, nor does the state have any information from HUD that there is a problem with those mobile homes. None whatsoever," he said.

The trailers are not ready for immediate occupancy, Mr. Harmon said. They must be re-anchored before his office will supply Arrowood with a certificate of occupancy.

"Those trailers were required to be anchored in a coastal method with high wind loads," Mr. Harmon said.

"They were anchored for the wind zone we're in, which is obviously much less."

State regulations, Mr. Harmon said, require that trailers be anchored in the manner for which they were designed, not according to the wind zone where they are located.

Once the trailers are anchored properly, and the electrical and sewer tie-ins check out, Mr. Harmon said, his office will allow Arrowood to rent them. He was unsure how long those adjustments will take.

A phone message left Thursday for KDM Development was not immediately returned.

Reach Donnie Fetter at (706) 868-1222, ext. 115, or donnie.fetter@augustachronicle.com.

Comments

Riverman1

This whole matter was the result of an overzealous Columbia County bureraucrat drawing false conclusions. Then Mr. Harmon compounded the situation by demanding that HUD clear the trailers when HUD has no means to do so. Now it appears there is one last bureaucratic gasp coming from the self-important Harmon as he demands the trailers be anchored as if they were on the coast instead of as other trailers are anchored here. If the trailer owners don't have a lawsuit for harrassment, they should. Whoever supervises Harmon should call him on the carpet and tell him to accept the way they are anchored because every other trailer in the county is anchored the same way and approve them quickly. This has been an asinine and embarrassing episode. Harmon needs a huge dose of common sense.

RU4Real

Mr. Harmon's job is not to support the best interest of the developer, but maintain County regulations in the best interest of the people who will live in these trailers. He properly sought the answers to questions and is using common sense in moving forward. He should not be called on the carpet, as he is doing his job. Maybe Riverman1 could use a dose of reality. Maybe the developers were mislead into thinking this trailers were occupancy ready, but they should have know the trailers needed to have the manufacturers labels affixed before they could be approved for Certificate.

Riverman1

Mr. Harmon said at first that because the trailers were sold for scrap by the feds that they could not be rented even though the state approved the trailers. Scrap meant many things such as stained carpet and repairs could be made to the trailers. The state was not stopping the owners from renting the trailers, but Mr. Harmon saw fit to write a letter to Washington and say he was waiting on an answer before he would approve the trailers. Guess what, the feds never answered as I predicted they wouldn't. They have no idea what he wanted. They were not about to come all the way here and inspect the trailers. Mr. Harmon is the only one who wanted the feds involved. The owners had independent inspectors approve the trailers and the feds never answered, Mr. Harmon says state regulations have a catch 22 and because the trailers were designed to withstand hurricanes they have to be set up like they would be on the coast. Mr. Harmon, the trailers are in Columbia County and should be set up like every other one is here. I'm willing to bet the state understands this matter perfectly and wasn't about to make an issue. Again, it seems Harmon took it upon himself to find a way to stop matters.

Riverman1

Following Harmon's logic, if a trailer designed to be set-up in Columbia County is taken to the coast, it still has to use the inland, Columbia County set-up even though it would be subject to coastal winds. Sheesh. Hey...I don't want trailers around either, but until we have an ordinance enacted we have to play with fair rules and can't put up our own personal roadblocks. I'm sure Mr. Harmon has good intentions, but he appears to be misguided.

ListenAndLearn

River, I understand your concern, but most of the newer trailers (at least since 91) are already anchored with zone II hurricane resistive anchors, even around here. Me thinks Mr. Harmon hadn't faced this scenario (how many people have?) before & went the route he thought best. He went to the source of the trailers. Pretty logical, unless it's Monday morning.

Riverman1

KK, like I said, I'm sure Mr. Harmon has good intentions and things got out of hand with all these various levels of government involved. What you say about most trailers around here being anchored to a zone II standard may be true, but it is not the law. Trailers here don't have to meet that standard if I understand this whole matter right. The county needs to start going out of the way to make up for some of the wrongs the owners of these trailers have suffered.

ListenAndLearn

River, I'm not sure if it's Building Code or self imposed by the builders, or law. I won't disagree about what the owners of these trailers have been through. BUT. There is a thing called "due dilligence" (short for buyer beware). Maybe KMD should have tried that before they bought the trailers. That or the NY based carpetbagger company thought that a lil' ol' hick trailer park in GA would'nt be noticed.

Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...