City procurement case begins in federal court

  • Follow Metro

The clarity of Augusta's code section governing purchasing became a federal question Tuesday. In the latest legal challenge to the way the city decides which goods and services to buy, Stewart-Corbitt General Construction of Thomson has asked for a restraining order to stop the construction of a fire administration building until the end of its lawsuit.

On Tuesday, Stewart-Corbitt's attorney, Robert Mullins, argued that the city procurement code is unconstitutional because it is impossible to properly or consistently interpret its meaning.

The city's procurement director cited the materiality clause in rejecting Stewart-Corbitt's bid. The code says the clause mandates perfect adherence to every bid provision, but it also provides for corrections after bids are open, Mr. Mullins said.

Stewart-Corbitt's bid was rejected because its notary public didn't date the stamped notary signature. The bid of $1,095,000 was $9,583 cheaper than RCN Contracting's winning bid.

James Ellison, whose firm is representing the city along with its in-house legal counsel, called the materiality clause crystal clear, saying it states that everything is to be perfect in the bid.

The code doesn't allow the procurement director to waive that requirement, he said. Only the commission can do so, and they voted to give the contract to RCN Contracting, in effect denying a waiver to Stewart-Corbitt, he said. A Georgia Supreme Court decision that says a governing body can waive minor errors in a bid doesn't say it must do so, Mr. Ellison said.

Mr. Mullins countered that the whole purpose of procurement law is to provide the best goods and services at the lowest cost to taxpayers. The materiality clause makes that impossible in cases where the lowest bidders are rejected for minor errors, he said.

Stewart-Corbitt's lawsuit is one of a series against the city because of its procurement practices. Two other federal lawsuits alleging bid-rigging are pending.

Reach Sandy Hodson at (706) 823-3226 or

What's next?

U.S. District Judge J. Randal Hall wants to review the bid requirements for the construction of the fire department administration building before deciding whether to issue a temporary restraining order to stop construction.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
ONLY THE TRUTH 04/15/09 - 01:42 am
If Ms. Sams was not

If Ms. Sams was not African-American she would have been fired a very long time ago. Why can't we measure everybody the same--Like Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. admonished ALL of us to do????

pofwe 04/15/09 - 05:46 am
Power corrupts. Especially

Power corrupts. Especially when held by a minority. I have a few opinions as to why but ... I'll let Justus4 explain. Mr. 4 you're up.

justus4 04/15/09 - 07:46 am
Some people don't like the

Some people don't like the rules. When in doubt, go to court especially if there is a friend in the court. Thats what is happening here because Stewart-Corbitts bid was not properly filed. Question: Did they know the proper procedures from previous filings or is this an attempt to place the entire process on trial, thus creating a diversion to allow bids to be refiled? It's probably the latter and a friendly judge (one whose known to "hook U up") may agree with such an obvious plan. If they think this will work, boy this judical system is worse that anyone expected.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs