Tucked into a congressional spending package criticized as being full of pork are earmarks designed to keep Richmond County streets safer and quieter and residents healthier.
A $760,000 barrier on Bobby Jones Expressway will reduce noise around Glenn Hills Drive, $350,000 will furnish Richmond County sheriff's deputies with in-car computers and $285,000 will train health professionals at Joseph M. Still Burn Center at Doctors Hospital.
Sheriff's Col. Gary Powell said the agency relies on outside funding to put computers in patrol cars. The earmarks will fund new computers for cars.
Ten members of Georgia's 15-member congressional delegation attached 150 earmarks totaling more than $90 million to the omnibus spending bill approved last week, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan government watchdog committed to ending wasteful spending.
That works out to $9.31 for every Georgian. The per capita dollar figure is lower than all but one state: Arizona.
South Carolina came in at No. 38 with $15.83 for every resident.
Earmarks have become synonymous with pork -- wasteful government spending. But one person's pork barrel project is another person's legitimate expenditure, said Thomas P. Lauth, the dean of the University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs.
"It's probably incorrect to start with the premise that earmarks are wasteful spending," Dr. Lauth said in a telephone interview, adding that he isn't so naive as to think egregious spending doesn't occur.
Earmarks are one way for elected officials to represent their constituents, he said. The earmark process allows lawmakers to inject projects into federal bills that would not have been able to compete in the larger budget process, but are important to the local community the lawmaker represents.
Georgia's earmarks include $209,000 for an initiative to improve blueberry production, $346,000 to study the effects of stinkbugs on cotton, $300,000 for the preservation of a 1925 coach stop in Savannah, $333,000 for Warner Robins' Museum of Aviation and $285,000 for an industrial park in Homerville, a south Georgia community of 2,800 people.
"It's a process that works well, but ultimately earmarks get caricatured as wasteful spending," Dr. Lauth said.
Earmarks aren't additional spending, but rather money set aside in the budget as discretionary spending, he said.
Jeffrey Lazarus, a Georgia State University assistant professor of political science, said he opposes a process occurring in relative obscurity without merit review. One congressman has already been jailed for his earmark spending and others are under investigation, he said.
"Earmarks are just another brand of pork barrel projects," Dr. Lazarus said.
The most recent federal spending bill is 8,500 pages and was handed to Congress 24 hours before its vote, making it impossible for lawmakers to know what is in it, he said.
Nationally, earmarks are unpopular, but to the local community receiving particular earmarks they are popular, Dr. Lazarus said.
No earmarks were directly attributed to five members of the Georgia delegation, all Republicans, including Rep. Paul Broun, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense.
"The congressman has promised not to make any earmarks or request any earmarks until the process is fundamentally changed," said Pepper Pennington, his press secretary.
Mr. Broun's criticism is of the process, which should be transparent and require a debate on the House floor, Ms. Pennington said. The congressman wants to lead by example.
Taxpayers for Common Sense credited Republican Phil Gingrey with the state's highest earmark funding from solo earmarks with $31.5 million, most of which were for water and infrastructure projects.
"I think the number is a little misleading," Mr. Gingrey's press secretary, Chris Jackson, said.
The projects earmarked by the congressman were placed in the budget by President Bush and would have been funded regardless of the congressman's actions, Mr. Jackson said. Mr. Gingrey earmarked the items as a show of support for the projects.
Earmark projects can be helpful, particularly if you're transparent about what you're doing, said a spokeswoman for Rep. John Barrow.
"The 12th District appropriations requests that were included in the omnibus bill will greatly benefit the communities they are going to," press secretary Jane Brodsky wrote in an e-mail.
U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss stands by his earmark requests, and that's why he posted them online months ago, press secretary Ashley Nelson said. He voted three times to cut all earmarks out of the omnibus bill.
"Sen. Chambliss has always supported eliminating earmarks," Ms. Nelson said. "But as long as the rules allow him to request worthwhile projects to help Georgians, he will continue to do so."
The senator's office defended the "targeted expenditures," saying they were requested before the economy fell on hard times. The requests, however, should stimulate business and investment. The blueberry research and coach stop are economic investments, which are expected to generate revenue and supply jobs.
Despite efforts to reform the process, Dr. Lazarus said the number of earmarks is growing and he doesn't expect the practice to go away anytime soon.
Reach Greg Gelpi at (706) 828-3851 or greg.gelpi@augustachronicle.com.
By the numbers
$90,163,019
Total of the 150 earmarks attached to the $410 billion omnibus spending bill by 10 members of Georgia's congressional delegation. That breaks down to $9.31 per Georgian. Local-interest earmarks include:
$350,000
In-car computers for Richmond County sheriff's deputies
$285,000
Training for health workers at Joseph M. Still Burn Center
$760,000
Noise wall on Bobby Jones Expressway near Glenn Hills Drive
Surely not Saxby ! Targeted Expenditures? Blueberry research?LOL
In car computers? lower noise??? that crap can wait, LOAN the money to small business owners so they can hire some of the newley unemployed. Gulfstream is about to lay off 1400 Georgians. I guess while people sit at the home they are about to lose , they can have peace and quite,,,and the cops have new computers so they can evict them in a timley manner...geeez
Saxby has to pay for all those ads he was runnung during the runoff. No LOBBYIST left behind, got to take care of his son Bo the LOBBYIST.
The dims want to break the backs of small business because it's a group that they can't monitor, control or unionize. Don't expect any help soon.
Obama didn't suggest the specific earmarks or pork....your elected officials did! They are the ones who insist that if a legislative bill does not contain what they want, they won't vote for it! Put the blame where it is due!
Regardless of which side of the political spectrum you are on having earmarks in the legislation that is being used to "bailout" so many businesses is wrong. That just adds to the money we all have to pay back in the end! If what is being placed in as earmarks is legit then request it somewhere else! As constituents we should not be critical of earmarks requested by other states and then support our own.
$760,000 for a noise barrier is probably for the motorists on Bobby Jones.
No i think its for the people who live on glenn hills drive. Who don't want to hear 520 traffic daily. I drive down that ride sometimes. And you can hear the cars on 520 with no problem.
a noise barrier for the ghetto ,thats a good one,and instead of incar computers the sherrifs dept just needs new cars,i know a county mech and he said the ones they have are so old and wore out its hard to keep them running,i say buy them TOYOTAS,NISSANS OR HONDAS,that would make GOD and the REPUBLICANS happy.oh i forgot GODand REPUBLICANS are one in the same.
If Saxby detests earmarks but still requests them for Georgians as long as the rules permit, why doesn't he request more? Georgians got fewer earmarks than any state but Arizona. Why? Does Saxby always want us to come in last just so he can avoid being politicially inconsistent? If he cared about Georgia more than his party and political career, he would have requested every dime in earmarks he could get away with.
If Obama cared more about our kids than his party and his political career he would have vetoed this bill.
ibew, I say never buy foreign cars. Always buy American but get rid of the unions that cause the auto makers so many problems and do not saddle the companies with legacy payments. GM, Ford and Chrysler probably need to declare bankruptcy so the unions will be out oif their hair. Then reoffer the jobs as nonunion so costs will come down. I know you will disagree but they have hampered the auto industry in America with costs that add to the costs of cars that the American public should not have to pay. By the way, I am a conservative Republican.
your foolish enough to believe what comes out of your mouth .20% of american industry is union ,now i disagree with alot the uaw gets ,but nobody forced the big three to sign these contracts with them.and to blame unions for corp failure is stupid ,where is all the NON-UNION TEXTILE plants in s.c. ,------GONE TO MEXICO AND CHINA,where is all the NON-UNION FURNITURE plants in n.c.-------GONE TO MEXICO ,CHINA AND VIETNAM. my wife and me were shopping for a kingsized bed and all we could find were chinese and vietnamise this bed was almost 2400 dollars and i ll bet the worker got maybe 2 dollars an hour to biuld it.i left it in the store.WW most people like yourself have no idea what the unions stand for ,just believe what you hear ,ONE THING WE DO BELIEVE IN IS BUYING AMERICAN AND SUPPORTING OUR COUNTRY ,DO YOU?, THINK ABOUT THAT ON YOUR WAY TO WAL-MART
Ford signed a deal where they only have to pay auto workers 49-50 dollars per hour.... wow what a deal.
i say buy them TOYOTAS,NISSANS OR HONDAS,that would make GOD and the REPUBLICANS happy.oh i forgot GODand REPUBLICANS are one in the same.
Posted by i.b.e.w..electric on Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:51 AM....Good idea IBEW, as these autos will last a lot longer than the junk Detroit has put out for years the sheriff now has. BTW, it's GOP not God.
The projects earmarked by the congressman were placed in the budget by President Bush and would have been funded regardless of the congressman's actions, Mr. Jackson said. Mr. Gingrey earmarked the items as a show of support for the projects.....Pure BS as thee President does not put earmarks in legislation.
NONE of these earmarks qualifies as an economic STIMULUS...A stimulus needs to go directly to the consumers or small business (so they can hire new ppl) to be considered a stimulus.
Thanks to Pres. obama signed the bill with earmarks after Republicans asked the president to veto the bill that Republicans attached their pet projects showed their two faced politicans playing games from Georgia.And Senator Saxby voted against the spending bill, you hypocrite.