Augusta Chronicle Editorial Staff
President Obama claims his ambitious agenda is about making America stronger.
Others suspect it's more about making America more socialistic.
Either way, by trying to revamp the country's health care, energy and education systems at all once, he's trying to build a house in a hurricane.
Even his supporters are losing confidence he can do it, or should even try. Focus on the banking and credit crisis, they're saying. Everything else can wait.
They're right.
Famous financier Warren Buffett has supported Obama and advised him. But even Buffett is saying the administration's response to the banking crisis has been "muddled," while the economy goes "over a cliff."
"People are confused and scared. People can't be worried about banks, and a lot of them are," Buffett said last week.
Buffett has called the situation "an economic Pearl Harbor," while others see it as an economic 9-11. Either way, it's been a dangerous situation, and the president and his people need to focus on it.
Instead, they've taken on what they see as every major problem the country has, from health care to education to energy.
As syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer so deftly observed on this page last Sunday, many of the president's priorities and programs have had nothing whatsoever to do with the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.
"Health, education and energy -- worthy and weighty as they may be -- are not the cause of our financial collapse. And they are not the cure," Krauthammer wrote.
Indeed, they may instead be part of a leftist agenda aimed at fundamentally remaking the infrastructure of American life.
About Obama's early adventures into health, education, energy and more, Krauthammer writes, "The fraudulent claim that they are both cause and cure is the rhetorical device by which an ambitious president intends to enact the most radical agenda of social transformation seen in our lifetime."
Regardless of the motivation, though, the White House's lack of a laser-focus on the banking and credit crisis has vexed and frightened the markets and, perhaps, taken some steam out of what we hope are positive signs of economic recovery in the auto, banking and retail sectors, as well as a bump upward in the stock market.
Let's be clear, here: We don't buy into the president's views of big government, but on the economy we do not want him to fail!
But William Galston, a former President Clinton adviser, in an article titled "Barack's Too-Long Wish List" in the liberal New Republic , warns that an unfocused agenda might do in Obama's presidency (and with it, we might add, the economy). Galston says both Presidents Carter and Reagan had ambitious, even radical agendas -- but that Reagan was more successful because of his clarity and discipline.
Likewise, Galston writes, FDR focused on the banking crisis -- and reassured Americans he was on top of it with the Emergency Banking Act, passed in one day.
"It is time for President Obama to focus his considerable leadership and communication skills on the financial crisis," Galston writes, "to speak candidly with the people about the magnitude of the problem, to embrace a solution commensurate with the problem, and to do whatever it takes to persuade Congress and the people to accept it. If he does not, he could end up where another highly intelligent, self-disciplined, and upright president did three decades ago."
In other words, back home.