Augusta Chronicle Editorial Staff
Perhaps we should have seen this coming. Despite the mainstream media's hands-off approach to candidate Barack Obama, there were enough signs indicating what we were getting: the most radically liberal president in American history.
But Washington's heave to the far left in only a few weeks has been truly breathtaking.
The president has proposed more spending in just his first month-plus in office than America has spent since its founding.
Abortion has nearly become a sacrament; public funding has been broadened, and a rule protecting health-care providers who refuse to participate in abortion-related activities as a matter of conscience is on the way out.
It has nearly become verboten in the Obama administration to refer to terrorists or a war on terror.
And many wondered how committed to Israel -- our best friend and sole democratic partner in the Mideast --someone named Barack Hussein Obama would be.
But no one could have predicted an Obama administration pick to head the National Intelligence Council, Charles Freeman, who once said the brutal Chinese crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in Tianenmen Square was "overly cautious."
Overly cautious? The crackdown, renowned for its harshness, killed 2,500.
This is a truly stunning story.
ABC News reporter Jake Tapper said Freeman, in that 2006 e-mail, sounded "like a hard-line Chinese Communist Party flack."
Freeman also has a record that many view as hostile to Israel. He has questioned the patriotism of Jewish congressional aides. Under his direction, the Middle East Policy Council once published a treatise that critics found "shoddy academically and anti-Semitic," reports Tapper -- but Freeman was proud of it. And Freeman once accused Israel of "smother(ing) Palestinian democracy in its cradle."
That's just absurd. Israel has given up land and forcibly evacuated its own people in order to make peace with the Palestinians. Yet, the Palestinians return the gestures with Hamas terrorism and rockets raining down on Israeli cities.
Freeman also is said to have unusually close ties to Saudi Arabia, and a report by the Center for Security Policy says he was part of the "Iran lobby" pushing to improve relations with Iran without preconditions.
Yet, Freeman is Obama's choice to head the vital National Intelligence Council, which produces the National Intelligence Estimates that the government relies on to keep Americans safe.
Tax cheats are bad enough. So are the ethically challenged: As Bronx, N.Y., Borough president, Obama's "urban czar" pick Adolfo Carrion "pocketed thousands of dollars in campaign cash from city developers whose projects he approved or funded with taxpayers' money," reports the New York Daily News .
But a man who thinks the Chinese should have acted more decisively to crush the pro-democracy demonstrations in Tianenmen Square has no business in our government at any level, and certainly not in such a key post.
What is this administration thinking?
And how much will it get away with?