Reactor plan deemed safe

  • Follow Metro

A proposal to add two reactors to Plant Vogtle cleared a second major hurdle Wednesday with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's finding that there are no safety or site issues that would prevent issuing an early site permit.

In an 800-page final safety evaluation report, regulators evaluated the project's vulnerability to earthquakes, plane crashes, floods, dam breaks -- even hurricanes -- as part of an effort to identify potential problems before new reactors are built.

The document is a companion study to a final environmental impact statement that was issued in August, NRC spokesman Roger Hannah said.

"This is the other major hurdle, but there still has to be a final decision," Mr. Hannah said. "It's basically the technical half of the review, where they look at the design and all kinds of information that would be important to plant safety, as opposed to the plant's impacts on the environment."

Southern Nuclear, like Georgia Power a subsidiary of Southern Co., filed its Vogtle early site permit application Aug. 15, 2006, and has also applied for a Combined Operating License to build and operate two AP1000 reactors on the site on the Savannah River, 26 miles downstream from Augusta.

Although a decision on an early site permit could be made as early as this fall, many of the issues and studies must be repeated during the company's quest for a combined operating license.

Environmental groups opposed the permits on grounds that the regulatory commission did not consider the impact of global warming and climate change that could affect availability of water in the Savannah River.

However, according to the report released Wednesday, regulators explored the impacts of climate change but found no reason to adjust the site's suitability.

"The staff acknowledges that long-term climatic change resulting from human or natural causes may introduce changes," the report states, but new conditions or restrictions could be imposed in the future "if new information shows that the climate has changed."

Reach Rob Pavey at 868-1222, ext. 119, or rob.pavey@augustachronicle.com.

PROPOSED EXPANSION

- Southern Nuclear applied Aug. 15, 2006, for an early site permit that would give the company up to 20 years to decide whether to build one or more reactors at the plant.

- The planned expansion would create 3,000 to 4,000 construction jobs -- fewer than the earlier project because newer technology allows prefabrication of major nuclear reactor components.

- Southern Nuclear hopes to get approval for the permit, which would allow the issuance of a combined construction and operating license as early as 2011.

- If construction goes as planned, the new reactors could go online in 2016.

- The two proposed reactors would use about 53.6 million gallons of water per day during normal use and up to 83.2 million gallons per day at maximum use, with 50 percent to 75 percent of that volume potentially lost as steam.

- The new reactors, manufactured by Westinghouse, would be shipped by barge up the Savannah River, which would require dredging. Each reactor would require two steam generators weighing 600 to 800 tons apiece to be shipped by boat.

Source: Southern Co.

Comments

SandyK2005

"Environmental groups opposed the permits on grounds that the regulatory commission did not consider the impact of global warming and climate change that could affect availability of water in the Savannah River." ---- Sometimes I just want to play Homey from "Livin' in Color" to whomp these fools upside the head. No, they don't complain about the radioactive fallout in South Richmond County that has been higher than federal guidelines. No, they don't even complain about the drain of water needed to cool these reactors (do people in Augusta understand these reactors don't cool itself like radiators in cars??). What do they complain about? "Global Warming". [NASA truly, truly, truly get that manned Mars mission going -- STAT!!]

baddgf

Sandy, I believe the federal guidelines you are referring to are just pollution levels not actual radioactive levels. Nuclear reactors do not release radioactive matter to the atmosphere, coal plants on the other hand do. Most often people mistake the water vapor (steam) coming from the cooling towers as a radioactive release and that is absolutely not the case. Also, the water is borrowed from the river, not consumed. This is a continuous cycle, water in and water out. There is a very small percentage of water lost due to the water vapor and that is it.

karmakills123

hey punk...it's true because sandy says so...and sandy knows everything about everything...swear to God...........

SandyK2005

Karma, will you get off the jealousy kick? I posted this information about foliage contamination last month. Trying to find it now to repost, but it's clearly radiation not "pollution"....Found it! "(4) Leafy vegetation (forage) from two locations in southern Richmond County exceeded the airborne-pathway reporting level of 15 mrem/yr to bone: 370 % of the reporting level with a projected dose of 56 mrem at Bush Field; 170% of the reporting level with a projected dose of 26 mrem at McBean." ---- http://www.gaepd.org/Files_PDF/gaenviron/radiation/radrpt2002_summary.pdf --- MREM is a measure of radiation, so Punking, there you have your proof.

SandyK2005

"Also, the water is borrowed from the river, not consumed." ------ Do you know why they call such plants Hot Water reactors? Do you realize the temperature of that water when released? Do you realize how much water will be needed for now 4 reactors?

baddgf

Sandy, I thought you were referring to the articles in the Augusta Chronicle on pollution. I also read the article attached to your post. I do understand how radiation is measured; I work with it on a daily basis. The numbers posted in the article does not say the fallout came from plant Vogtle. These numbers you are referring are almost nothing when compared to radiation you come in contact with in your day to day life. This was the next paragraph down in that article you posted. By comparison, the National Council of Radiation Protection estimates the average U.S. citizen receives around 40 mrem per year from medical X-rays and 10 mrem per year from consumer products such as tobacco, smoke detectors, and luminous dials and signs. In comparison with normal statewide exposure to background radiation in the environment, which averaged 65 mrem per year for 2000-2002, the potential impact from eating fish is not significant.

Riverman1

Let's streamline the approval process and get about another 200 reactors online fast. Use the same designs and skip scrutinizing that part of the process.

SandyK2005

Put all 200 in your backyard, Riverman. I'm sure it'll radiate the property value sky high! lololol

Fishboy

"Do you realize the temperature of that water when released? Do you realize how much water will be needed for now 4 reactors?"

No, Sandy, I don't. Why don't you tell us what the temperature of the water returned to the river is. Tell us how much water will be needed for the 4 reactors and what percentage that is of the average river flow.

SandyK2005

Naw, you need to start doing your own homework. Momma can't be doing it for you all the time. And I can relax critiquing your reply for a change. :D

My_2nd

good! this country needs many more reactors. nuclear power is a very safe and clean source of power.

icemanw83

Man, if people actually knew what they were talking about it'd be amazing. The steam that everyone sees from those cooling towers comes from the turbine. That water does not cool the reactor!!! The reason that there is so much steam is because Vogtle makes so much electricity and keeps your lights on. There's a need for cooling water as long as you make steam. Coal, natural gas, combined cycle, and nuclear. They all need cooling water. And that looks like a lot of water from the river, but Vogtle uses like 1% of the total flow in its cooling process. And as far as the radiation goes, if the radiation were airborne, which it probably would be, wouldn't SRS get most of it instead of South Augusta? I mean, the wind blows from the west most of the time right? It's not like Vogtle is some giant radiation hot spot and it contaminates everything around it.

jhvenier

Sandy,
You truley do not have a clue!!! The radiation release...come on. Plants do not release radiactivity period. You get more from the natural surroundings than from standing next to a reactors containment. You clearly are trying to put a bunch of bull and scare the unknowing public, hopefully they will see you are just another chicken little who actually cannot state facts. Actually, to let the public know, we also have technologies to burn waste and cool plants without excessive water from the river. Just like the global warming public, which saw one of the coldest winters for a long time, the river will rise and lower just as it has done for millions of years. It seems the anti's enjoy picking on a few unfounded topics and then drive them into oblivion. WE NEED NUKES AND YES I WOULD HAVE ONE IN MY BACK YARD....PEOPLE LISTEN TO THOSE THAT HAVE WORKED AROUND IT, THEY TEND TO BE MORE EDUCATED THAN SOMEONE WHO SITS AROUND KNITS AND COMPLAINS.

SandyK2005

$14 billion on hot water reactors. Imagine $14 billion to make every GA residence have their own power plant inside their home. And it doesn't need 2 tons of cooling water per minute, as it's called Cold Fusion (which the GA Powers and other energy outlets will do everything in their power to keep people from getting, as there's no profit if people have their own power plants).

SandyK2005

Biz, stop with your socks already. I can tell it's you because reading your screed is like reading a 15 year-old's rant. God, even all caps!!

Ruckly

Yeah Sandy cold fusion is so popular over the world I hear its in every home throughout Europe. They keep it in the closet next to all the other junk they bought off infomercials that doesn't work.

SandyK2005

Ruckly, work for GA Power or are you one of those Goddard critics, who just vanished into thin air after his rockets proved to be successful? Don't play the game as history proves the debunkers wrong over and over and over.

icemanw83

Sandy, believe me, if cold fusion were possible, people would be all over it. But there's no such thing yet. People are working on it, but it doesn't work. And please quit calling them "hot water reactors". The proper term is Pressurized Water Reactor, like Vogtle has, or Boiling Water Reactor, like Plant Hatch in Baxley has. You're just showing your ignorance.
Vogtle 3&4 will bring 1000+ stable jobs just to operate. Not to mention the 3000-4000+ construction jobs that it will bring. The taxes that Southern Co will pay alone will increase the local economy in a major way.
As far as people having their own power plants, I don't trust people with their cars. Why would I trust you with a cold fusion reactor (if the thing even existed).

JohnnyYuma

Hot water reactors are cooled like cars. The water is pumped through cooling towers that cools the water before entering the river.There is profit in cold fusion, because they will not be giving it away, they will sell it hence the profit. Reactors do release radiation, remember Three Mile Island and there have been many others!

TechLover

Does this actually surprise anyone? Now, if good old Republican State Sen Balfour gets his way, we get to start paying for it early. How come they keep saying that nuclear power is "almost free"?

curly123053

You will always have folks like Sandy trying to make us think the "SKY IS FALLING". Just ignore the silly rants and move on to the more intelligent rants....if there are any here.

Riverman1

The worst nuclear accident in this country was at Three Mile Island over 20 years ago. No one was injured in that accident. The technology is better today. It's safe. Radiation is not released.

duckey

Plant Vogtle IS in my backyard and I have yet to see anything glowing from radioactive released materials. I have lived by the plant for over 20 years (appx 3-4 miles as crow flies) and I welcome the jobs and boost to the economy that the building of two new reactors will bring

jhvenier

Sandy
Well it isnt Biz, and as for your junk you are putting on the comments well, I can hardly read it before I laugh too loudly. The CAPS was put there because I have been involved in studies concerning not only radiation effects and nuclear technology but, also studies of effects of neighboring communities and nuclear power / nuclear processing. At one time I was a skeptic of having plants close to communities and based upon theories I projected while learning two degrees along with 30 years association with nuclear, industrial effects and technologies for industrial improvements I became pro nuclear, rather prefering to live next to a nuke plant than a paper plant. I was wondering, what is your profession? It seems all you want to do is to put people down if they disagree with you. Actually, I usually choose not to converse with the mentally challenged so, I am not going to argue with you any further.

toldya

jhvenier: thank you for calming my fears. sandy had me going there for a while.

jhvenier

I have to commend the people of the Augusta area / SC areas living near Votgle, who have commented positively. It seems most comments, with exception of a very few are supportive. I think it goes to show that it is proof that over the years many have seen the positive results of nuclear and now embrace it. It also seems that the people are sick of being mis-informed and prefer to learn for themselves. It seems that finally people want positive results instead of having politicians make you choke down their bull and want to spend billions of our tax money on further unfounded technologies. I am an advocate on renewables but, it makes no sense to put all eggs into one basket. I think a mix of renewables with all other energies is smarter, economically safer and safer as far as our countries defense is concerned. Maybe when renewables become further advanced they can become a bigger picture. As of now, we just dont have the time to allow political bungling to wait until it is refined. We are in an energy crisis at this point and nuclear is a very viable option.

aaa

Does anyone know if Sandy takes medication?

toldya

if not, she should consider it.

TechLover

I see many articles griping about the lack of water in Clarks Hill Lake. Since Vogtle will need increased flow, get used to the lake being empty.

jhvenier

Clarks Hill Lake level rises 3 feet
Posted: Monday, Dec. 22nd, 2008

Top headlines

Accused Aiken police officer shooter denied bond

AIKEN -- South Carolina authorities will not release video recordings today from the Dec. 20 traffic stop that ended in the shooting death of an Aiken officer.
Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...