Across South Carolina

  • Follow Metro

Bedridden SC woman found with dead roaches on back

GREENWOOD, S.C. - Authorities say an elderly woman has been removed from a Greenwood home strewn with animal waste and dirty diapers after officers responding to a gun theft call found her back covered with sores and dead roaches.

Investigators told The Index-Journal of Greenwood they arrested two people living in the home and the woman's son on Tuesday. The officers said the home smelled so bad they couldn't breathe.

The woman, who was not identified, and the couple's 3-year-old child have been taken into protective custody.

Police say 41-year-old Gordan French and 28-year-old Billie Jean French are charged with criminal neglect of a child, while 57-year-old William McGuire is charged with neglect of a vulnerable adult. It couldn't be immediately determined if they have lawyers.

SC employers learn about new immigration law

WEST COLUMBIA, S.C. - South Carolina employers who attended a Wednesday training session on the state's new law to stem illegal immigration said complying should be painless.

About 50 people attended the seminar sponsored by the state Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation. The meeting in West Columbia was among more than a dozen to be held across the state to educate employers.

The law passed last June requires all businesses to verify their new hires are in the U.S. legally or face civil fines of up to $1,000 per worker. The state can also temporarily shut down businesses if their owners knowingly employ illegal workers: up to a month for the first violation and at least five years on the fourth.

"The penalties are extremely severe," employment attorney Chris Lauderdale told attendees. He called the shutdown provision "really kind of bizarre."

But the solution is easy, he said. The Greenville labor lawyer recommended all businesses use the federal online database E-Verify.

"I wouldn't do it any other way. If you run someone through E-Verify and they clear, you're OK," he said. "It's almost idiot-proof."

SC tax agency dealing with cuts without layoffs

COLUMBIA, S.C. - South Carolina's top tax collection officer said Wednesday he'll manage budget cuts without layoffs that would leave some scofflaws with fewer audit fears.

That was the first concern raised by legislators beginning to write the state's $6 billion budget and holding hearings Wednesday from state agencies that collect and spend that cash.

"I do worry about the Department of Revenue," said Rep. Jay Lucas, R-Hartsville as the agency began talking about how it's managing budget cuts during a House Ways and Means Committee hearing. "You get to the point where cut an agency like the Department of Revenue and at some point it's going to end up costing the state money."

Revenue Director Ray Stevens told Lucas' subcommittee that it raises 95 percent of the $6.1 billion that will flow into the state's general fund accounts this year. In the fiscal year that ended in June, he ran an agency with a budget of $40 million. Budget cuts since July have slashed that to $31.4 million, with more than half of that in midyear cuts since July.

SC governor moves up State of the State

COLUMBIA, S.C. - South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford is moving his state of the state speech up a week and out of the shadow of President-elect Barack Obama's inauguration.

Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer said the governor will give his annual speech Jan. 14 on what the state needs and what legislators can do to bring that about.

The speech will come a day after legislators return to Columbia to start their January to June session. Sanford usually schedules his speech a week or two after lawmakers return.

Sawyer said legislators' plans to attend Obama's Jan. 20 inaugural events were a factor in rescheduling his speech.

SC organizations choose sides on power plants

COLUMBIA, S.C. - Conservationists and business leaders are taking sides as the state's utilities pitch several new power plants, both coal- and nuclear-powered.

Some business officials support all efforts to increase electricity production in the state, which one industry expert says could need to be tripled in the next 10 years.

Others, however, favor the nuclear option over the $1.25 billion coal-fired plant state-owned utility Santee Cooper wants to build in Florence County.

Some environmentalists are opposing both, saying South Carolina utilities have not scratched the surface of conservation and alternative energy methods that could reduce the need for another generating plant. Some conservation groups oppose the coal plant, but not the nuclear plant.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
SCEagle Eye
SCEagle Eye 01/08/09 - 09:00 am
Pursuit of either a coal or

Pursuit of either a coal or nuclear plant at this point will be a blow to conservation, efficiency and renewables in South Carolina (or Georgia). Lacking serious energy efficiency and conservation programs in the state means that investing vast sums in new generation will be a way to stop aggressive programs designed to reduce consumption. Such methods should be considered before new plants, especially new nukes, which according to DOE cost $9 billion EACH, are brought to the drawing board. So, the question "isn't coal or nukes?" but rather do we support efficiency and conservation or not?

EMAGUY 01/08/09 - 04:37 pm
Pluto Boy, I think you should

Pluto Boy, I think you should put the weed down. Like it or not, our country uses energy, lots of energy. SLOWLY, we are getting better. Progress on energy efficiency will take time.
Your statements do nothing to solve the problem of providing energy for people in our state and/or region. But then, I think that is your point. You have to cut back on consumption if the commodity (energy) is scarce or in short supply. Speaking of supply, scarcity drives energy prices through the roof. High prices impact lower wage earners and poor folks the most. Are you saying people should be cold or not able to afford driving to work (if the subject were gasoline) in an effort to conserve energy? Surely you say that, knowing you or your family members will be warm and cozy.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs