Tell your uncle to bug out!

  • Follow Editorials

Last summer when gas cost $4 a gallon, Americans' demand for large gas-guzzling vehicles dried up like the morning dew under a hot summer sun. Small cars that got great gas mileage quickly became the new rage.

Consumers' change of appetite added to the woes of Detroit's Big Three, because trucks and SUVs were their best sellers. They couldn't change fast enough to accommodate consumers' new taste for fuel-efficient cars.

But since last summer, oil prices plummeted -- and pump prices are the lowest they've been in years. And just like that, Americans' appetite for big vehicles is returning.

Even though overall auto sales are still struggling due to the credit squeeze and recession, demand is leaning toward big cars again. Locally, Gerald Jones General Manager Brian Winters says SUV and truck sales are up 37 percent since September when pump prices peaked at $4 a gallon. Similar spikes in big vehicle sales are confirmed by national surveys.

It appears U.S. consumer demand for big cars will again shift into high gear as the recession recedes -- providing gas stays reasonably priced. Today's average is $1.65.

Consumers are only slightly less fickle than oil prices. Oil is a commodity with wildly fluctuating prices that not even OPEC can control. Even so, this much is certain: The stronger the economy grows, the higher fuel prices will rise; the slower the economy, the lower the price.

The low fuel prices we see today will last only as long as the recession -- which we all hope will not be long.

Smart consumers know this, and they will continue to buy fuel-efficient vehicles -- and push for hybrids and other technological changes in auto making that will lessen this nation's dependence on oil.

The problem is, to hasten this development, Nanny State activists are urging Congress and the incoming Obama administration to impose a gas tax that would return pump prices to $3.50 to $4 a gallon -- and keep them there.

That would be a big mistake.

It's almost always a mistake for government to use its taxing authority to control people's behavior. That's an abuse of power that violates Americans' fundamental freedom: the right to live our lives and spend our money in ways that other people don't approve of. Sky-high gas prices also curtail poor and low-income Americans' freedom to get around, including going to work.

Using taxes to boost pump prices to unconscionable heights is also a nonstarter. It would reduce discretionary spending in other areas, thereby depressing the economy.

Another Nanny State idea is to have government ban production of large vehicles, leaving only small, fuel-efficient cars for the public to buy. In other words, force the Big Three to make cars without regard to consumer demand.

What next? Will restaurants be forced to offer their most unpopular appetizers?

Government has no business being the arbiter of what consumers buy, unless it directly affects their health or safety -- which auto purchases do not.

Uncle Sam may not agree with consumers' auto choices, but it's their choice to make, not Big Government's. In our free-enterprise society, the consumer is king -- and that doesn't need to change. This is why automakers must be allowed to produce what consumers want.

Comments

joe hill

ACES, who do you think has paid for the roads and bridges across our country? Was that all the result of free market? No. Tax dollars paid for the infrastructure that we have in place now. The foreign auto companies are kicking the US companies in part because the foreign countries sponsor research and development into new technologies while our US government sponsors illegal wars in the middle east to benefit Halliburton and big oil. It always amazes me that conservatives call themselves conservative when they are anything but when it comes to actually "conserving".

Daddyrabbit

Part of that is true. Taxes DID pay for highways, but, a LOT of foreign auto company success is ONLY because they sell at similar prices to mindless americans and keep the profit made by manyfacturing for less! They make more, but, send it overseas partially by buying from their parent companies at hughly inflated prices and claiming less income for taxes. They do not give it to American consumers. Yes, they make a good product, but, not a superior product....read the auto repair sections in some of the publications!

GACopperhead

That's funny, I've only seen a 10 cent proposal. Where does that raise prices to 3.50?

overburdened_taxpayer

Last night there was a report on national news that a proposal to raise the federal fuel tax 50% is ready to go before congress because they say the money to repair and build inter-state roads and US highways has dried up.

patriciathomas

Get ready for numerous and huge tax increases. There's no one in congress to stop them now.

Riverman1

Don't you think the government should keep all of everyone's income and give a little bit on a regular schedule based on individual need? Since Haliburton caused the war in Iraq we could take all their profits and punish them that way. Foreign car companies should give be forced to let the UAW into their factories in the US and in the foreign countries so that the union can pocket all income and give it to the shareholder owners as they see fit.

shamrock

I think all our hard earned money should go to the government and we would be able to draw only food stamps, gasoline rations and welfare type benefits. That would spread the wealth better than any system I could think of.

Riverman1

There you go, Shamrock. That's the spirit. How many food stamps you get should be based on family size. Right?

fredinaiken

"To each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities." Karl Marx. (Worked so well in Russia starting in 1917!)

draksig

For one thing, if the government were to ban the manufacture and import of large autos, the used car market will more than fill the gap. More used car lots will open sellign large used autos to fill the consumer needs, older SUVs and trucks will be overhauled and refurbished if the alternivite were to buy mini cars.

You can not pull a camper nor can you tailgate off a Prius!

shivas

The automakers were allowed to make what consumers wanted, and now need a bail-out. Gosh, I guess Toyota, Honda and Hyundai did not make what consumers wanted. The right-wing always has a welfare check ready for corporate America, while letting children suffer from hunger and lack of medical insurance.

rufus

Cuba manages to keep the 1950 Chevy's running

justthefacts

Some people, shivas comes to mind, either can't read or have reading comprehension problems. Or, maybe there is another reason for their uninformed comments.

reader54

Shivas:Well said!! Let em eat cake! French Revolution.

jgdarling

Raise the gas tax. Stop sending money to our enemies.

Riverman1

Wait a sec, I thought Obama said he was going to lower taxes for 95% of the people?

CH

Shivas, Toyota and Honda are made in Japan. When I was stationed there, they had a government agency called MITA, Ministry of Technical Assistance. Guess what they do? That's right...they subsidize corporations, especially R & D to produce products that will compete in world markets, namely the US. If you think keeping industries in operation that directly or indirectly keep millions of Americans working as a welfare check, maybe you need a reality check. Furthermore, the children of this country have no idea what real hunger or lack of care is. Go overseas if you want to see children really suffering. If our country is so terrible, why are there so many literally dying to get here?

Riverman1

I don't think anyone is starving in Japan.

Dukedirtbag

the best way to rehulate large vehicle usage would be control by the individual states not the Federal Gvmt.fuel mileage surcharges on tag registrations would work

CH

Riverman, take a good look at the so called ghetto kids. Non of them look like they've missed any meals to me.

Riverman1

CH, I agree with that. No one goes hungry in this country. I didn't mean there was hunger. You had been talking about Japan and I thought you meant.....ah well, you get the idea. Sorry for the confusion.

shivas

Ch, sounds like you support govt. subsidies for corporations. Also, to justify hunger and lack of medical care to children in this country because it's not as bad as a 3rd world country, well that just sounds like far-right thinking. The kind that America rejected this past November.

LaTwon

so shivas are you saying obama is against auto bailouts?
bank bailouts? hahahhahahhhaaaaaaa change hahahhhahahaaa

CH

Shivas, you remind me of the lazy butts who whine when something is free but isn't delivered to them at their doorstep. I'm not wild about using tax dollars to help a corporation, but hell, we use billions of dollars to support the lazy whiners of this country who refuse to work. Why not help working people? As far as hunger and lack of medical care in this country, why don't you actually do some research before shooting your idiot mouth off? Show me children who are actually starving, or where there is absolutely no medical care for them available. You can't because it doesn't exist.

LaTwon

and if and when you get your one size fits all healthcare, who do you think will be controling it? the giant healthcare corporations.
all those that own all of the politicians from both sides of the isle. how about subsidies for no one and nothing? how many illigitimate babies shall i have to pay for? how many years of school before they go to prison? how many years of prison?
those damned evil people that work and invest, they are just so greedy.

CH

LaTwon, good one. Wish I had said that.

patriciathomas

well said LaTwon, shivas hates you.

johnsmith

It's curious to me that those of us who oppose ALL "welfare"--including section 8 housing, farm subsidies, TARP and Big 3 bailouts--face accusations of hypocrisy in fora like these. It is even more interesting to me that those accusations come from those who support welfare for those who produce nothing but more dependents, while opposing it for those who produce products used by the "virtuous poor." They also, frequently, condemn Israel for responding to rocket attacks, and demand that Israel engage in "proportional response." Yet, if Israel WERE to engage in proportional response, by firing rockets into pizza joints and shopping centers, these same liberals would want Israel dragged before the World Court. These same liberals not infrequently equate those who DO read, and who DO know that polar ice has increased in 2008 at the fastest rate since records were kept, with Holocaust deniers, simply because these liberals do NOT know that fact about polar ice. They also, from their refuge behind the most professional and responsible military in the history of the world, vilify those who serve, while claiming to be "for the troops." And it is conservatives who are hypocrites...

johnsmith

Uh-oh...Aside from the fact that they were George W. Bush's idea, and therefore spawn of the evil, sickening twisted mind that guides his every action toward the destruction of all that is virtuous, I thought that the Bush Tax Cuts were baaaad, baaaad because they created additional government debt?! I thought that the Democrats were all about PAYGO, and that the Bush Tax Cuts For The Wealthy were nothing more than a govt handout to corporate fatcats, the same evil demons who brought us the crash? And yet, not only is The One not going to push to immediately rescind those taxes, but he is going to propose MORE AGGRESSIVE TAX CUTS than did Bush?! Wha...???? http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123111279694652423.html You mean, he will also give tax cuts to (gasp!) corporations??? Holy trickle-down, Batman! This guy may be smarter than I dared hope. Don't tell me that he is going to let reality trump ideology by recognizing that it is corporations, small and large, and the individuals who work for them, who CREATE WEALTH in a free economy, and that if you want that economy to be healthy, you have to promote that activity? Glory halleluja...lotta mad libs out there, I bet...

Top headlines

Michaux: Tiger-Phil duel whets Masters appetite

For all the intrigue generated by some fresh faces in golf the last couple of years, nothing injects life into a season like an old-fashioned Tiger-Phil duel.
Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...