Republicans ousted, not conservatism

  • Follow Editorials

Conventional left wing wisdom holds that the Nov. 4 election wasn't just a rejection of President Bush, John McCain or the Republican Party "brand," but of conservatism itself.

Liberal columnist Eugene Robinson made that argument in a Chronicle op-ed piece last Wednesday, contending that America is "turning left" and is no longer a "center-right nation." He's dreaming. Democrats did so well because of the tottering economy and impatience with the Iraq war.

Culturally, most Americans are still very conservative. They believe in God, personal responsibility, religious symbols on public property, voluntary school prayers, the right to bear arms, law and order, stiff punishment of criminals and curbs on Internet and TV smut.

Even Robinson's fellow African Americans, who turned out so heavily for Barack Obama, voted against same sex marriage ballot propositions by 70 percent. That's not repudiating conservatism.

South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford has it right. He pointed out at the GOP Governors' Conference last week that voters turned down Republicans, not conservatism.

"Republicans have campaigned on the conservative themes of lower taxes, less government and more freedom," he said. "They just haven't governed that way. America didn't turn away from conservatism, they turned away from many who faked it."

Indeed, many Republicans campaigned as conservatives and governed like Big Government liberals -- not only in Washington, but in many of the states they controlled too. Sanford noted that in recent years state governments have grown faster and fatter than the federal government.

Did Republicans think voters were so dumb that they wouldn't see the hypocrisy between what they said and what they did? Besides, it's suicide to try to win elections by out-promising Democrats on handing out public largesse.

"So during our 'time in the wilderness,' it's my hope that we go back to the basics of conservatism," said Sanford, "what it stands for and its real-world implications for people's lives. The sooner we do, the sooner we will see good policy from Republicans, and the sooner I suspect we will return to electoral favor."

In short, Republicans must start practicing what they preach. Moreover, they must not let themselves fall into the trap of becoming a "cult of personality" party in order to please the TV gods who always prefer personality over substance. They did that with Ronald Reagan, but it's worn off. Democrats did it with Bill Clinton, and it wore off too. Eventually, even Barack Obama will wear off. So Republicans must guard against glomming on to the first pretty face that comes along.

Sanford's on the right track. And though he wouldn't admit it, he may be looking to get on track to the presidency himself after his term expires in 2010. And if he does, you can be sure he'll express the need for his party to get back to basics. Campaign on principles -- conservative ideas that are true to the Constitution and our Founders' vision. What the party needs in the years ahead are leaders with vision and substance built on a solid conservative base.

Comments

christian134

Absolutely right on target Chronicle...American Republicans are like the proverbial Christian...The name sounds good and looks good on a resume but is not of much use in the person's lives...The old adage "Do as I say Don't do as I do" has become the cry of the Christian Conservative-Republicans...We need to do exactly what was stated "Practice what we Preach"...To many government officials believe "truth" is whatever the majority of the people agreed with or whatever helped advance their own personal power and political goals. When there is no basis for truth, there is no basis for moral right and wrong. Justice becomes whatever works or whatever helps those in power...Conservatism Christians behavior has its very foundations in the Word...That is the standard moral compass for all truth and moral behavior...We must begin again, stand firm for what is morally right and what is immoral....This is the only way to overcome the extreme liberal policies knocking at the door...

JohnRandolphHardisonCain

Republicans can run away from their party crying "I'm a Reagan Republican not a Bush Republican" or "I'm a real conservative not a Bush big spender" but most of the people who voted for & supported Bush & McCain backed their policies. Among those trying to distance themselves from failed Republican policies is The Augusta Chronicle editorial staff. They supported the unjust war in Iraq. They supported torture & indefinite detentions without trial at Guantanamo. They supported repeal of the "death tax" on estates worth more than $10 million. They supported tax cuts on the rich & they backed Bush on his bloated budgets & deficit spending. They supported repeal of environmental laws & regulations that protect clean air, clean water, safe food & safe consumer products. They did this all in the name of big business. Cultural conservatives were thrown scraps to appease them. Bush was seen in church when it was politically advantageous to him. In the end Bush policies alienated almost every demographic except southern white reactionaries. The southern strategy did not work this year. Now Republicans are wandering in the wilderness. Obama will be judged on his record not his media appeal.

christian134

Excuse me JohnRandolph the media has and will more than likely continue to build on Obama's appeal just to sell the papers and air time which in turn increases their bottom line....

Ga Values

This cut & paste says it all, I only hope our party will change....... "South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford has it right. He pointed out at the GOP Governors' Conference last week that voters turned down Republicans, not conservatism. "Republicans have campaigned on the conservative themes of lower taxes, less government and more freedom," he said. "They just haven't governed that way. America didn't turn away from conservatism, they turned away from many who faked it." Indeed, many Republicans campaigned as conservatives and governed like Big Government liberals "

JohnRandolphHardisonCain

Pardon me, christian134 but what is "moral" about waging an unjustified war in Iraq, repeatedly killing civilians in Afghanistan & Pakistan with missiles, or torturing detainees at Guantanamo and other "black site" CIA prisons? The evangelical "Christian" base did not carry John McCain's campaign to victory. I admit that unfortunately many if not most Americans have become bellicose. This country is a center-right country as far as a militant, aggressive foreign policy goes. But that militancy and aggression have hit a wall in Iraq and Afghanistan. The totally unjust and unjustified U.S. war of aggression in Iraq has destabilized the entire Middle East and now South Asia including Pakistan. Obama isn't going to be able to withdraw from Iraq, shore up Afghanistan, and wage war on Al Qaeda in any simple 1,2,3 fashion. United States is in the wrong for invading Iraq and occupying it for 5 years 8 months. United States was not wrong for invading Afghanistan in search of Al Qaeda and the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks, but it is in the wrong in occupying Afghanistan for 7 years 2 months without improving the lives of ordinary Afghans. They have turned against the U.S./NATO mission.

shivas

Let's see, so they voted for liberalism because their party was too liberal. Great logic AC.

christian134

War is a necessary evil in order to protect those who seek to annihilate others for simply being born..It has been with us since the beginning of time unto now and will stay until Jesus returns...This war was and is being waged to stem the growing tide of terrorism and extreme attacks that murdered thousands in this country as well as the continued hate attacks on people of all races and religions across the world...Instead of always putting the stomp on our brave men and women, who have sacrificed for your right to say what you please whenever you please, try to say something encouraging...Actually a nice hand shake and a big thank you would be in order don't you believe JohnRandolf?...

patriciathomas

shivas, coffee. your deduction is farther off then usual.

patriciathomas

When most of the conservatives were thrown out of congress, the moderates ran the show. We got out of control spending and lobbyist influence. In short, no change from the Dem congress. McCain epitomizes this part of the Repub party. Imitation Dems will never defeat the real Dems in an election. They won't get conservative support. As long as moderates control the Repub party, the country will be dragged to the left.

JohnRandolphHardisonCain

You smack of Christian imperialism, christian134. Christianity, conservatism, and warmongering somehow go together in your religious extremist mind.

I4PUTT

shivas...don't jump to wrong conclusions. Patience is a virtue. Your check is coming & you will be so happy you may not even feel the need to sound so desperate in the r&r's. Here's a little song I wrote...Might want to sing it note for note..Don't worry...be happy

I4PUTT

PY so what you're saying is we have suffered from Dems & Dem Lites?????

christian134

:-) JohnRandolph...I don't pretend to be God or to understand what God has in mind...But one thing I do know is that the Bible plainly advocates the helping of those who are oppressed, murdered all for the sake of greed, power, race or the worship of God and Jesus Christ...Christian Imperialism Wow...:-)

patriciathomas

Yes Putt, But mostly we suffered from lazy and uninformed voters. We are reaping what we have sown.

effete elitist liberal

Subtlety is not usually a strong suit for Mike (Oh, puleeeeze) Ryan, but
he's trying this morning! Sure, he spends most of his editorial spouting the old "just let conservatives be real conservatives and everything will be OK" line. But towards the end, he slips in that Republicans "must not let themselves fall into the trap of becoming a 'cult of personality' party in order to please the TV gods who always prefer personality over substance." Then, "Republicans must guard against glomming on to the first pretty face that comes along." It doesn't take a genius to see he's warning about the Republican fixation on Sarah ("Africa's a country, isn't it?") Palin. Palin is the new Britney, followed around by eager paparazzi and holding self-promoting impromptu "press conferences" at the drop of a hat. Subtlety's fine, but it's OK, Mike, make it clear: Republicans, beware of what you wish for with Palin. An idiot like her should never be a leader of the party of Abraham Lincoln.

karmakills123

"Palin is the new Britney, followed around by eager paparazzi and holding self-promoting impromptu "press conferences" at the drop of a hat." Wow does that sound like anyone else we know??

shivas

Lazy and uniformed like Sam Nunn and Colin Powell. Actually 4-putt, I am being hit pretty significantly by this economic recession.

JesusIsComing

In order to win this election, Obama did not stress his liberal credentials - he ran away from them and instead used the conservative argument of "tax cuts for 95% of working Americans" to get elected. That was better propanda than McCain was able to come up with and McCain hurt himself considerably by dragging Lindsey Graham with him everywhere he went. McCain is a moderate and tends to dislike true conservatives - Sarah Palin helped him with the base but the only way she could have pulled it off was to oust John McCain from the ticket. I will probably take about four years off from politics and hope that conservatives from both parties develop a response to what will surely be a rough new administration.

effete elitist liberal

karmakills: it's posts like your last which explain why voters nationwide roll their eyes at the fecklessness of Republicans. Don't you remember, kk, that it was the Republicans who first criticized President-Elect Obama as a celebrity? Republicans who first used the "Britney" slam? It was Republicans who first ridiculed the idea of President-Elect Obama as "the Chosen One"? When you wrote, "Wow does that sound like anyone else we know??" you obviously are saying to me that if I want to be critical of Palin as a celebrity, I should remember Obama is one too. YOU'VE GOT IT EXACTLY BACKWARDS!!!

SusieQ

Enough is enough!!! Come on get over it, Get a life. Let's stop bickering about all this and try to help the situation. Obama won so let's pray for the best!! SusieQ

justthefacts

EEL, are we going to have to listen to the Palin/Africa misquote for the next 100 yrs even from intelligent folks like you? I mean it is one thing when people like Shivas/angiedad/jack234 use it. But, you don't appear to need lies and innuindo (sp) to make your points. If so, then your oponents will respond with 57 states. Which, although probably just tired at the time, P.E. Obama did, in fact, say.

realistineducation

American ciizens are sick and tired of the right wing agenda. That has been seen by the results of the last two elections. America will keep moving left, for our own survival. We will sway the Supreme Court in the direction it needs to go, and maybe one day, yes one day, I as a gay tax paying American, will be able to have the same rights as everyone else, and get married to the person that I love.

effete elitist liberal

justthefacts: thanks for the sort-of compliment. But I'm not clear on what you mean by "misquote." Do you mean she didn't actually say Africa was a country and was MISQUOTED, perhaps intentionally, by a hostile media? Or do you say "misquote" when you mean Palin actually did say so, but can be excused for MISSPEAKING when tired and off guard, as Obama obviously was in the infamous "57" slip? There is a big difference between misquoted and misspoken. So please clarify your claim, and even more importantly, please explain HOW YOU KNOW!!! Also, you chose a parenthetical detail from my post. What about my main claim that many Republicans are treating Palin as a celebrity, a political Messiah, the "Chosen One," in much the same way they ridiculed Democrats for treating Obama?

shivas

Justthefacts, I have never mentioned anything of the Africa quote. Don't think it's relevant. anyone can misspeak. Now, her inability to answer questions, that's another matter. Truly, how many times have we misspoken? I can't throw that stone at Palin, and thinks it's pretty bad that others do. I understand she is the future of the Republican party, and look forward to her vision of America.

Paws..

After two years of Obama and a good look at where liberalism will take our country there will be a monumental shift back to conservatism. It may not be under the banner of "Republican" but it will happen and could mean the formation of a third party

justthefacts

EEF, she is not on record saying it. Google it until the cows come home. You will not find it. It is a rumor. Neither of us actually know. You will probably continue to believe it, I will probably not. Was she treated by Republicans as a "rock star". Yea, I guess she was. However, she certainly wasn't treated as so by the media, as Obama was.

effete elitist liberal

justthefacts: yes, the "Africa" story is a rumor. It is, however, a rumor with a known pedigree. "Fox News' Carl Cameron reported yesterday that the McCain campaign struggled with Palin's apparent stupidity, which included not knowing that Africa is a continent, not knowing which countries are in NAFTA, and refusing preparation before major media interviews. Cameron added that Palin was 'hard to control emotionally,' and was prone to 'temper tantrums.'" The source of the rumor was a disgruntled McCain staffer. It was made public by Fox News. Any role played by the Dems or the "liberal media" was after the fact and incidental. I have no facts on the future of Sarah Palin, but I do have a prediction: Palin will soon become a footnote to history, and if she doesn't, the Republican Party is in worse shape than I think it is. When even the AC takes a veiled editorial swipe at her (my original post today), you know her show will have a short run.

KSL

EEL is not up to date. The whole Africa quote thing turns out to have been a hoax.

rufus

Perpetrated by a blogger who admitted it was a hoax. EEL is an idiot.

justthefacts

One last note, Hillary was prone to temper tantrums as well. Is it a "women" thing? Just kidding, Just kidding, Just kidding!!!!

Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...