ATLANTA --- After weeks of nasty campaign ads, the final debate of the Senate race quickly grew testy, with the candidates shaking fingers at each other, making snide remarks and disagreeing on several major issues.
The debate sponsored by the Atlanta Press Club pit incumbent Sen. Saxby Chambliss against Democrat Jim Martin and Libertarian Allen Buckley.
At one point after several interruptions, Mr. Chambliss told Mr. Buckley, "You should have taken your pill tonight, Allen."
Financial issues sparked the feistiest clashes, particularly the $700 billion bailout of the financial industry and tax cuts, the topics of the most pointed of the ads.
Mr. Martin lashed out when Mr. Chambliss said he would not favor a new economic stimulus plan until the bailout was allowed to work.
"Outrageous. How outrageous," Mr. Martin said. "Saxby Chambliss economics is taking care of people at the top."
Mr. Martin said Mr. Chambliss should have supported extending unemployment compensation rather than providing support for large banks that he said were using the funds to compensate executives and purchase other banks.
Mr. Chambliss responded by turning to Mr. Martin, shaking an index finger and asked which banks were abusing the bailout funds.
"Tell me one bank that's going to do that," the senator said.
Mr. Martin faced Mr. Chambliss, wagged his own finger and said newspaper stories have mentioned banks buying other banks with the funds. Mr. Chambliss said some banks that are in danger of failing would be purchased, but that was what the bailout funds were designed to do.
Mr. Buckley said both were avoiding the issue of cutting the spending. "Look what they're selling: more fiscal irresponsibility."
Mr. Chambliss defended his vote for the bailout bill, saying Georgia business owners told him they would begin laying off workers if it didn't pass.
Mr. Martin said the legislation should have tightened regulations on lenders, and Mr. Buckley said it should have been structured so the financial industry paid the cost instead of taxpayers.
The three also disagreed on taxes.
Mr. Chambliss' support for a proposed national sales tax, called the Fair Tax, has been the subject of several ads for Mr. Martin.
Mr. Chambliss said it would help ordinary people control their own finances by abolishing the Internal Revenue Service.
Mr. Martin said he's for a middle-class tax cut proposed by Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.
Mr. Buckley said he favors shifting the income tax structure to four rates, with the highest rate fluctuating with the size of the federal deficit.
The three now await the decisions of voters Tuesday.
If none gets more than 50 percent of the vote, the top two will face each other in a Dec. 2 runoff.
We desperately need Saxby, for all his minor faults. If this race goes into a December runoff, Dems will flood Georgia with out of state trial lawyer, radical chic, etc. money to try to wrest control of the Senate. Vote Saxby! Even if you have to hold your nose! If you are a Libertarian (as I am), vote L in other races, not this one!!
Why I can't Vote for Saxby Chambliss(Socialist,Ga). Saxby's Gang of 10 Traitors has helped elect OBAMA. His vote for the $700,000,000,000.00 Wall Street Bailout with an added $153,000,000,000.00 of pork was done after he got over $2,000,000.00 from Wall Street LOBBYIST. Saxby worked with Pelosi, Reid, Boxer & Kennedy on the ILLEGAL AMNESTY Bill & to over ride President Bush's Veto of the PORK filled Farm Bill. Saxby is owned by LOBBYIST including his son Bo. We need a Senator who will work for Georgia not out of state special interest. I have been working for Allen Buckley, Libertarian Candidate. He is a good honest man who will work for us. http://www.buckleyforsenate.com/welcome.asp
For the past couple of years Chambliss has been running for re-election. For all that time he has been looking for an issue(s) that he could exploit to his advantage. He has tried to get people riled-up about illegal immigration and domestic oil drilling, all the while our economy was completely falling apart due to highly leveraged, unregulated hedge funds and their derivative trading.
Chambliss still refuses to regulate and provide oversight of hedge funds and derivative trading.
Chambliss failed us and if re-elected he will continue to fail us.
OscarLewis I hope everybody read and understand what you are trying to tell them/
I would vote for Zaxby, before I would vote for Saxby. I like to eat my chicken rather than watch it walk around the halls of Congress!
if you are too ignorant to understand why we need Saxby even though we may not agree with him..then just don't vote at all..(.I swear they need to take an IQ test in order to vote !!)
Whether you vote for Buckley or Saxby does not impact whether Martin wins on November 4th. There are 3 possible scenarios: (1) Saxby wins with 50+% (2) Martin wins with 50+% (3) runoff. I can guarantee you one thing, Martin will not get to 50%, so you don’t have to worry about him winning on Nov 4th. A runoff is almost inevitable at this point. After Nov 4th, lets see where the senate races shake out and whether Saxby would tip the scales one way or the other in terms of 60 senators for democrats. If it would, then vote for Saxby in runoff. You can still vote your conscience on all matters right now.
Chambliss will be a much better choice than a DIM majority/controlled Senate.