What does Colin Powell believe?

Actually, based on the criteria set by CURRENT republicans, IF Colin Powell were for "bigger government" and "more spending," then he'd be endorsing another Republican, wouldn't he? He was the Secretary of State under the current president who now has us doling out $10 billion a month in Iraq - which as we all know was a mistake. When the WORLD was tellling us to wait for more proof, we "maverickly" went in, and now the American taxpayer foots the bill for Bush's daddy-complex while the nation of Iraq itself has a surplus.

# # # And which presidential candidate proposed MORE government spending to buy up bad mortgages? Spending freeze? WHAT spending freeze???

# # # Again how many times does it have to be said: Barack Obama is no "friend" of William Ayers. They served on the same board; that doesn't make them "friends." The late congressman Charlie Norwood served in Congress at the same time as former Florida congressman Mark Foley; does that, then, mean, that Norwood was a "friend" or "associated" with a probable child molester? Of course not. Obama has never condoned Ayers' actions and has made it a point to repudiate them,

And why is it okay, in the mind of this editorial board, and the G.O.P., to "REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH" when it's taxpayer money going to bail out corporations (while CEO's enjoy multi-million dollar bailout severanaces), but wiping out the Bush tax cut on those making over a quarter of a MILLION DOLLARS and cutting taxes on the middle class is bad? But what's REALLY funny is, I don't recall this publication ever writing a RINO attack about Colin Powerll before. How odd! I mean, its not as if his pro-choice tendencies are a new revelation

Just out....Al Qaeda has endorsed McCain. This is not a joke.

"how many times does it have to be said: Barack Obama is no "friend" of William Ayers. They served on the same board; that doesn't make them "friends." Posted by RonRoberts on Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:11 AM ......>>>>>..... Say it as many times as you want Ron but it's still a lie. B.Ho's political career began in the Ayers home. They were not only friends, they are truely kindred spirits.

666

Powell has certainly done an about face or so it seems....Maybe he was pretending to be all about morals as well as a man whose supposed belief was the welfare and security of this great nation...Now it seems he, Powell, has always had these semi-conservative beliefs and has neatly fallen in line with the many who believe that Obama is the long awaited "savior"...

Conservatives have known Powell's Republican "roots" were an inch deep for a long time. Powell is about Powell. He cares what the media say about him and was upset because he was seen as backing President Bush on Iraq - so he distanced himself. That did not rehabilitate him in the eyes of the press - so he found a way to ingratiate himself with them now. It doesn't hurt that Obama is related to Black people either, as is Colin Powell. John McCain was once a media darling also when he opposed President Bush on several matters. But the media has chosen a Savior and all opponents must be destroyed. Powell, who should have all the glory he needs by now, still seeks glory. Let's hope he has backed the wrong horse.

It's obvious that Gen. Powell has been "Living in America" for the last 8 years. That would be my guess why he didn't endorse John McCain.

That's funny...The editor stated that: "But it still ranks as one of the most bizarre political stances in memory." Wow, what about Zell Miller. I guess nobody remembers him giving the keynote address at the Republican Convention. That's why they call it "Fair and Balanced" reporting and liberal media bias.

Powell is black. Obama is black. I wonder why Powell would go against everything he's professed to believe in during his entire life to endorse a radical Marxist. It probably has nothing to do with skin color. Who's surprised?

All Republicans can do is spout their tired old excuses. They have failed this country for 8 years and think that by preaching fear and lies often enough, it will make their fantasies come true. Wealth has been redistributed to to wealthy for way too long, and their motto has been "Let them eat cake". The lies that they use to justify pandering to the rich have been proven for what they are by the collapse of the Republican backed mortgage and banking system. Palin is a corrupt, secessionist religious fanatic. McCain insists on no timetable even though the Sovereign Iraqi state demands one. He insists on boosting the tax breaks for the wealthy and the corporations, even though it's proven by the unemployment statistics that they continue to send jobs overseas. It is my sincere hope that the jobs of PT and those who follow the Republican party are all sent overseas, so that they may get a taste of what it's like to be on the other side of the coin. Most Democrats work and pay taxes, and they have a right to stop the Republicans from picking their pockets. Besides, Al Qaeda backs McCain, so he must be a real winner.

PT, is that the best excuse you can give? Your choice of parties and candidates shows your morals, take from the poor and give to the rich. Ignore intelligence and integrity, and blame race. I would be embarrassed to put proof out to the world that I was an elitist, greedy, corrupt, racist Republican. The real shame is that you actually believe what you say. Astounding.

Justus4 that's too complicated. It's far more simplistic to believe the southern view espoused by patriciathomas that everything is Black and White. The root cause is really George W. Bush. After "W", Jerry Lewis, Chris Rock and even Rush Limbaugh, would be credibal candidates. Don't blame Obama, who's half white, for his blackness.

Right wing radicals and other racists have accused blacks that support Obama as being racist. If blacks can support his "Black half" and Whites can't support his "White Half" who's really the racist here??? He's bi-racial. I hope that's not to complicated for the bottom feeders to grasp.

Anything is too complicated for them, that's why they're Republican.

GaC,It's not a matter of taking from the poor to give to the rich. The achievers seem to gain money just fine because of preparation and effort, just as the nonachievers seem to give up money because of poor preparation and effort. Only the weak minded and lazy need to be coddled by the nanny state.

Of course Republicans don't understand Powell's reservations about 2 more "conservative" Supreme Court justices, there should be a balance, and the Constitution should be interpreted as it's writers intended, which is protection of FREEDOM, that is antithesis to a Republican, after all they would love the Supreme Court to ok, illegal wiretaps, trials based on the "testimony" of covert, unidentified informants and trials without any Constitutional protections. They don't understand that the Constitution protects EVERYONE, not just the elite. If they do it to some, one day it will be done to everyone. The Republican agenda mirrors the times leading up to Hitler's taking over Germany. They say blacks aren't qualified, that the poor deserve what they get, and blame everyone else for the problems they create. We cannot let that happen.

PT, I am neither weak minded or lazy. Your statement justifies my preceding comment. You haven't got a clue, because you're part of the problem. Achievers like Palin? Achievers like all the mortgage lenders who caused the banking failure? Achievers like Cheney's buddies at Enron? Like Keating? Like Stevens, Craig and Foley? WOW! I've been wrong all these years.........

Meaningless? Then why write such a fearful editorial? The right-wing is getting, what we used to call as kids, smeared. When that happens, the only thing left is to call names and make excuses. Just read the posts by patriciathomas. She's at home building her survival shelter as we speak. She's long-known for being fearful of black people, or anyone who is different from her. She's a great reason for the death of the right-wing we are all witnessing.

Here we go again. The Gacopperhead comedy hour. Man this gets old.

Notice how it's the right wing posters who bring up Obama being the "savior" or "messiah" and that race thing. If you listened to the interview, Colin Powell explained why he's supporting Obama. At least he's not challenging people to duels like (I've totally lost my mind and become republican) Zell.

The distinguished general Colin Powell thinks just like the rest of the afro/Americans. That is since Barack Obama is a half breed they shoud support him. DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

I suggest those that are so against the gov "nanny" state send back their stimulus checks and when of age, refuse social security and medicare.

I4putt, is that all you can say? I guess when you can't argue a fact, the only thing to do is insult. RIP to the Republican agenda. No more wealth for the thieves, give it to those who actually work for a living, unlike the CEOs of Enron, AIG and Fannie/Freddie. I wouldn't be surprised if Obama even takes Georgia. We hear about the Bradley effect, but no one is talking about the Bush/Republican effect. I think there are more ex-Repubs than are letting on. We'll see on November 2.

Meaningless? Obama has jumped to over a 10 point lead since the endorsement. Poor AC, what a stupid argument questioning conservatism through a Supreme Court litmus test. Guess what, Obama is leading in the catholic vote. Maybe you can write a piece how they should all be excommunicated. Palin is also sinking in the polls as those who view her favourable continues to decline to below 50%. Keep up the attacks, it's helping Obama immenely!

With two weeks to go until Election Day, Obama now leads his Republican rival by 10 points among registered voters, 52 to 42 percent, up from 49 to 43 percent two weeks ago.

Obama's current lead is also fueled by his strength among independent voters (topping McCain 49 to 37 percent), suburban voters (53 to 41), Catholics (50 to 44) and white women (49 to 45). Hmm, so as the insane man says, I'm the only sane one, everyone else is nuts...

So, according to the ACES world, the Goldwaters and Eisenhowers are also RINOs, too, huh?

GaC, you've been convinced of some of the most bizarre things. The constitution needs to be reinterpreted? The system that made this country great needs to be reinvented? I believe Enron did best when Clinton was in control and failed immediately upon losing support after the 2000 election. Fannie and Freddie belong to the far left. AIG failed. The Bradley effect is preparation for the big whine. Just like last time. Your "interpretation" of history is very Democratic.

Powell endorsing Obama makes it clear that he has no core principles anymore. Powell has been dead politically for a few years now and this is nothing but an attempt to make himself relevant again. He cares more about resurrecting his political career than sticking to his beliefs system...that is if he ever had any beliefs. And before anybody gives me the line about him serving his country...I did too....it doesn't make me free from criticisim and it doesn't make him either.