Report urges more subsidies

  • Follow Metro

ATLANTA --- State officials could ease burdens on working poor families over the next five years by investing nearly $100 million more to a program that subsidizes child care, according to a report released Monday.

The report by the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute also said state officials can tap existing federal and state funds toward achieving the goal.

The analysis of Georgia's federal and state subsidized child care also recommends officials expand state Pre-K and study the preschool preparation levels of children enrolled in neither state Pre-K or federal Head Start programs.

"It's just a question of the state prioritizing where funds should be invested," said Clare Richie, the report's author and a senior policy analyst with the institute. "Especially in an economic time like this, you want to look at investments that are going to have a strong long-term impact -- and child care is something that can."

One in three children in Georgia younger than 6 lives in families with incomes below 150 percent of the federal poverty threshold -- $26,400 for a family of three, according to the analysis.

Parents of those children often rely on one of the state's three major programs that provide subsidized child care, Child Care and Parent Services (CAPS), Georgia Pre-K and Head Start/Early Head Start.

CAPS is most encompassing: Funded by a combination of federal and state money, the program covers part of expenses for child care using a scale set by state officials, for children up to about age 13, depending on circumstances.

Georgia Pre-K and the federally administered Head Start program are designed for pre-grade school children.

The report says the state's fiscal year 2010 budget for CAPS -- between $207.5 million and $217.5 million -- will let the program serve just shy of 54,000 children maximum per month, a five-year low.

But the report recommends officials try to reach 80,000 children a month by fiscal year 2014.

The report suggests a five-year investment of $20 million a year to expand the number of children served; funds could come from reallocation of federal TANF funds and from state coffers, Ms. Richie said.

The report recommends the state eliminate an 8,100-child waiting list for the state Pre-K program by investing an additional $33.3 million a year in state lottery proceeds.

Ms. Richie also suggested the program expand services to fold in 4-year-olds currently served by Head Start, letting that program focus more on equipping more 3-year-olds for school.

The report said state officials should study what, if any, preschool preparation children served by neither program receive.

Comments

whoisblockingthetruth

More govn't handouts of the backs of the taxpayer!

InChristLove

Am I looking at this all wrong...$26,400 a year for a family of three, calculates out to $12.69 an hour.....doesn't seem to be low income to me. I know times are hard and there are families that honestly need help but $12.69 an hour is pretty good money in my opinion.

426Hemi

Before taxes.

i.b.e.w..electric

the lottery is supposed to take care of alot of this expence,or at least it did before we got involved in the multi state lottery

cathieisgood

Why can't people be held responsible for having kids. If you can't afford them, you shouldn't have them!

LCC0256

Cathie what a unique concept!! Are you saying that parents should be responsible for their own children's health and welfare? In this modern marxist influenced society? Does that mean i should also pay for my children's HEALTH INSURANCE TOO!!?? WHAT A NOVEL IDEA!! This country is full of lousy lazy excuses for human beings that continue to procreate then expect responsible citizens to care for them and their offspring, all the while filling their children's heads with a sense of ENTITLEMENT from "the rich"...it is disgusting What kind of ABLE BODIED SANE man would sacrifice his self respect by expecting society to care for his family?... one with no respect for himself or others is the clear answer to that question. I would never allow my children to be "cared for" by anyone other than their mother myself or a member of our family or close personal friend. Anyone who allows this is asking for trouble by most always negatively affecting the helpless children who want to be cared for by THEIR PARENTS!!! Look around at the last 2 generations and dispute this FACT.

Top headlines

Accused Aiken police officer shooter denied bond

AIKEN -- South Carolina authorities will not release video recordings today from the Dec. 20 traffic stop that ended in the shooting death of an Aiken officer.
Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...