mrgroothand, you mean that it sounds "inconceivable." You, as a human being, are capable of being "incredulous," but a statement or proposal cannot. That said, you are correct, and I am shocked to see how much you and I agree on this issue. You, and a good number of other observant individuals, and I, are sounding an alarm that not many are heeding. When universities "protect" muslims by creating single-gender gym and pool hours, but will not "protect" Christians from politically correct dorm-live "codes"; when hospitals "protect" muslims by allowing female nurses to scrub only up to their wrists (b/c baring their arms is grounds for stoning, or something), but don't "protect" their patients from MRSI; when local governments "protect" muslims by allowing them to broadcast the call to prayer over several square miles, but do not "protect" any other religious group's right to less-intrusive expression, then there is a problem. These are not principled stands; these (would-be) legislative bodies are scared of muslims, as well they should be, since it is difficult to engage in spirited debate once your friendly neighborhood imam has had your head removed from your shoulders...







