Officials say Imperial could be fined millions

  • Follow Metro

SAVANNAH, Ga. --- Federal officials said Friday that Imperial Sugar Co. should face fines of more than $8.7 million for violations at two plants, including a Georgia facility where an explosion killed 13 people.

The Imperial Sugar Co. plant in Port Wentworth, Ga., had 120 violations, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration reported. Thirteen people were killed in an explosion at the facility.  AP / File
AP / File
The Imperial Sugar Co. plant in Port Wentworth, Ga., had 120 violations, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration reported. Thirteen people were killed in an explosion at the facility.

The fines would be the third-highest in the history of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's nearly 40-year existence. They include $5 million for the explosion near Savannah on Feb. 7 and $3.7 million for the plant in Gramercy, La.

OSHA investigators concluded the explosion was most likely caused when a large bucket used to haul sugar in a silo elevator broke loose and struck the metal siding, causing a spark that ignited sugar dust accumulated beneath the 100-foot silos.

The agency said its investigation uncovered company audits, insurance records and other documents showing Imperial Sugar had been warned about combustible dust hazards in its plants since 2002. Its inspection of the Louisiana plant a month after the Georgia blast found workers wading through sugar dust up to 4 feet deep.

"This catastrophic accident could have been prevented if Imperial Sugar had complied with existing OSHA safety and health standards," OSHA chief Edwin Foulke said at a news conference in Savannah.

OSHA found 120 violations against the Georgia plant, including 61 considered egregious. In Louisiana, Imperial Sugar was cited for 91 additional violations, including 47 egregious ones. Many violations were similar to those in Georgia.

Fines for the Louisiana plant included $36,000 proposed by OSHA in March, after an inspection revealed levels of dust it considered so dangerous that Imperial Sugar was forced to shut down its powdered sugar operation for several days.

Imperial Sugar CEO John Sheptor said in a statement Friday the company would contest OSHA's findings.

"We believe that the facts do not merit the allegations made," Mr. Sheptor said. "As we go forward, we will continue to focus on the safety of our employees and our contractors."

OSHA officials said they were preparing for potentially lengthy litigation over the citations.

"It's pretty stiff," U.S. Rep. Jack Kingston of Savannah said of the proposed fines. "The third-highest penalty in OSHA's history is certainly a very bad thing to happen, but it underscores the tragedy."

The day of the Georgia explosion, workers beneath one of the storage silos had been knocking loose hardened sugar with metal rods, causing large amounts of dust to accumulate in a confined space, said Kurt Petermeyer, OSHA's lead investigator in the case.

The silo elevator and conveyors beneath it were shut down at the time, he said. But when workers on the next shift turned them on later, enough dust remained in the air to ignite like gunpowder. The initial explosion forced more dust into other parts of the plant, he said, causing several secondary explosions.

Sugar Land, Texas-based Imperial Sugar has owned the 90-year-old refinery, which produces Dixie Crystals brand sugar, since 1997. Located in Port Wentworth, a few miles outside Savannah, it is the second-largest sugar refinery in the U.S.

Three refinery workers remain hospitalized with severe burns at the Joseph M. Still Burn Center in Augusta. Two are in critical condition, while the third is in good condition, hospital spokeswoman Beth Frits said.

A Senate subcommittee planned a hearing Tuesday on combustible dust hazards and an Imperial executive was scheduled to testify.

Imperial Sugar plans to resume refining raw sugar before the end of year, and complete a new packaging plant and storage silos by next summer.

Comments

iletuknow

Another typical Savannah river polluter that is impossible to abide by regulations or to get rid of.

CoastalDawg

"Another typical Savannah river polluter that is impossible to abide by regulations or to get rid of." First of all, grammatically incorrect to end the sentence the way you did. Second, you know nothing about this company and the story has absolutely NOTHING to do with polluting the river, which is not an established fact in any way, shape or form. If you have evidence to the contrary, you should post it instead of making a blanket statement which is apparently unsubstantiated. Imperial Sugar/Dixie Crystals has been a Savannah industry for many years, having been run by a Savannah Family for many years until it was bought out a number of years ago. As with almost every governmental agency, OSHA has come to the battle too late even though that agency is charged with worker safety. If, indeed, the company had been "warned" of violations, did OSHA never follow up? Imperial Sugar has provided employment in the Savannah area for all these years, yet little if anything has been heard from any employees who were concerned with safety there; in fact, even now most are not blaming Imperial Sugar. Attorneys however are already salivating. State your facts or don't post.

digmick

Ms Thomas, what does your Free Market theory have to say about companies like Imperial?

iletuknow

Correction: Another typical polluter located next to the Savannah river..........
Sure..visit Port Wentworth ,take a long deep smell,look around, and see how well the city has capitalized on such a wonderful company.

TakeAstand

Coastal, so you are saying Imperial is blameless just becuase Osha never followed up and the employees didn't complain? It does not matter how many years they provided employment, they cost the lives of 13 people and seriously injured others because of an on going problem they were warned and knew about!!! How do you know if they complained or not?? Osha knew of the hazards and so did Imperial, does not mean all the employees knew of the dangerous enviroment they were working in and I have seen many a times employees complain to plant authorities and nothing at all get done, thats why something like this happens, becuase the higher ups did not do their job and they do not care!! Complete negligence on their part, all to make an extra buck.. now those bucks will be taken away!!! and shouldn't it be... First of all, IT IS grammatically incorrect... not sure becuase I don't claim to be an expert, but just didn't look right while you were correcting someone else and your punctuation did nothing for your grammar insult either.

mable8

The article presents only one side of the argument; no one has all the facts to make an informed judgment regarding the incident. By the way, I didn't realize I had walked into an English class!

Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...