Seat belt use urged after fatalities

  • Follow Metro

AIKEN --- In five days, five people have died in traffic-related accidents on Aiken County roads, prompting law enforcement officials to remind drivers that buckling up and slowing down could save lives.

A memorial cross stands on U.S. Highway 1 in Aiken County. In five days, the county has had five traffic deaths; four who weren't wearing seat belts.  Rainier Ehrhardt/Staff
Rainier Ehrhardt/Staff
A memorial cross stands on U.S. Highway 1 in Aiken County. In five days, the county has had five traffic deaths; four who weren't wearing seat belts.

"Speeding, no seat belt -- those are serious contributors to the most recent (fatalities)," said Lt. David Turno of Aiken Public Safety.

Four of the five victims in a string of highway deaths that began Saturday were not wearing seat belts.

The fifth victim, Noel Barrett, of Beech Island, was riding a bicycle at night when he was hit by a vehicle. Investigators are still looking for the car involved in that Tuesday morning hit and run.

"What's concerning is the fact that so many were unrestrained and that's what led to the deaths -- the fact that they are being ejected from the vehicles," Lt. Turno said. "The likelihood that they could have survived greatly increases had they been wearing their seat belt."

The most recent fatalities resulted from a single-car accident just before midnight Tuesday.

Angela Manley, 19, and Margaret Manley, 18, both of New Ellenton, were the unrestrained passengers in a car driven by David Cummings of Aiken that crashed into a tree at Southlawn Cemetery on Whiskey Road.

Angela Manley died at the scene, and Margaret Manley died at Medical College of Georgia Hospital on Wednesday.

Mr. Cummings also was not wearing a seat belt and was ejected from the vehicle. He was treated at MCG for a back injury that was not life-threatening and released.

Aiken County Coroner Tim Carlton said speed and alcohol appeared to have been factors in the accident, but toxicology tests were pending and no charges had been filed Wednesday.

So far this year, there have been 19 traffic fatalities in Aiken County -- a 24 percent decrease from 2007 during the same time period.

Of the 15 victims who had access to a seat belt, 12 were not wearing one.

"Seat belt usage continues to be a factor in the cause of fatalities," said Lance Cpl. Trevor Clinton of the South Carolina Highway Patrol.

"We really encourage everyone to buckle up."

Reach Michelle Guffey at (803) 648-1395, ext. 110, or michelle.guffey@augustachronicle.com.

2008 TRAFFIC FATALITIES


FATALITY.....SEAT BELT?


Judith Cox.....No


Larry Bowman.....Yes


Lamaas Barefield.....No


Michael Marcheant.....No


Brandy Cox.....Unknown


Gregorio Cruz.....No


Jerry Kemp.....n/a*


Robert Widener.....No


John Doolittle.....No


Linda Jones.....Yes


Susan Earley.....Yes


Dana Morris.....No


James Cohr.....n/a


Bridgett Carr.....No


Lillian Gilchrist.....No


Andre Garrett.....No


Noel Barrett.....n/a


Margaret Manley.....No


Angie Manley.....No

* N/a denotes that person who died was riding a motorcycle or bicycle.

Comments

mable8

It is interesting that statistics reflecting the serious nature of injuries AND deaths caused by the USE of seat belts are not published. I don't believe seat belts "save" lives when an individual is in an accident; a seat belt keeps the individual from being ejected in most accidents. And please, all you proponents of seat belt use, do not speak to me of the validity of a seat belt--spouse was using one and it collapsed his lungs which caused his death. There are many, many cases where people died as a result of seat belt use or have been permanently maimed by them. I use them only because that is what the law says we have to do, but I also equate them with a death sentence.

HYPOCRITES 08

If you do not see how seat belts plays a part in saving lives, nothing anyone will say to you will matter. Hopefully you are not one of those that do not believe in second hand smoking causing cancer.

christian134

Seat belts have saved more lives than those statistics reporting lives saved because of non-use....In my family alone two of my children were saved because they didn't have their seat belts on...Do I believe seat belt use is useless? The answer is quite simple..No...Wearing prevents more deaths than non-wearing...

cricketflea

Okay---I live in GA, where the wearing of a seatbelt is law. I know that it is law in SC also. I see people breaking this very law in GA every day too. I wear mine...I began wearing it simply because I wanted my child to wear one 17 years ago when he was in a car seat. Now it is automatic..not only for me, but for him as well and for anyone who rides in either of our vehicles. They either put it on or walk. What's the problem? There are fewer deaths wearing the seatbelt than NOT. It's documented! Geez--I could argue it all day...and I know....so could the idiots that refuse to wear the seatbelts...

patriciathomas

While under certain circumstances seat belts can provide safety, the REAL factor in the deaths is incompetent driving. The wrecks (not accidents) were all caused by the drivers losing control of their vehicles. The focus of this article, and way too many articles, is on the seat belt and now many drivers, especially new drivers and stupid drivers, feel that the seat belt gives them some power of invulnerability. All safety equipment, helmets, knee and shin guards, seat belts, gloves, roll bars, will improve your chances of no injury in a wreck, but not wrecking is still the best answer to safe driving.

UrNotReady4TheTruth

Sorry to hear about your loss Mable8 but what were other contributing factors to your husband's accident i.e.; speed, head-on collision? To collapse a lung there had to be a significant impact...

Newsreader

Mable8, I wonder if your husband would not have been injured without his seatbelt. If he was in a crash voilent enough to be crushed by the seatbelt, then what other object would he have been propelled against and would that object absorbed the energy or caused injury? I have "investigated" many accidents, I have seen many people killed in car crashes, I have seen those wearing seatbelts drown or burn, but I still beleive in seatbelts. I know that the chances are better when you are able to remain in the passenger seat. That is the way vehicles are designed. But patricia is right avoiding a crash is the best. All motor vehicle crashes are the end result of a chain of events, change any link and you change the outcome. Proper speed, more attention to the road and traffic, more awareness of the condition of the vehicle and the road, no driving while intoxicated (no matter how slight), seatbelts and child restraints, all make for safer driving and safer roads. It is a shame when a child dies. I can not imagine the horror of losing two children in one crash.

nadps53jrt

Seat belts do save lives. Look how good they work for NASCAR.

grizzilies

For people that do not believe in seat belts need to ride along with law enforcement and go to accidents. Maybe insurance companies should have a deal. If the accident is investigated and it is found out that you or your passenger were not wearing seat belts, they should cover little or no medical or what ever is in your insurance. Next what about people with no insurance.

patriciathomas

nadps53jrt, roll bars, gloves, helmets, fire resistant suits and special shoes also help with those seat belts. Still, if the drivers aren't involved in a wreck, all of the safety equipment is moot.

patriciathomas

grizzilies, again I see the obvious point missed. Only wrecks (not accidents) require seat belts. If one isn't going to be attentive, should one be driving? If a driver remains attentive to his task, will the need for seat belts be reduced? How did everyone over the age of thirty survive without seat belts?

patriciathomas

To consider a different perspective, shouldn't the article concentrate on "ATTENTIVE DRIVING TECHNIQUES URGED AFTER FATALITIES" ? While seat belts MAY have prevented the fatalities, not wrecking definitely would have.

Armywife

You know sometimes people are involved in accidents that aren't their fault. A person can be doing everything they are supposed to be doing -- not speeding, paying attention to the right etc -- but they still get in an accident. Someone could have pulled out right in front of them. Another driver could be driving recklessly. Then there are the causes that are nobody's fault -- road conditions, weather, flying debris, or a medical situation. The first accident this week was an elderly woman lost control of her car due to a sudden medical issue. Not her fault. She didn't die from the medical problem.
I firmly believe seat belts save lives. I know it first hand. And I believe that any passenger in a vehicle should be buckled up as well as the driver.

Retard

Wearing sealtbelts is the LAW. Use them or lose it (your life)

End of discussion.

patriciathomas

people that don't drive defensively or slow down for bad road conditions or drive when they have a medical condition (very old age included) are not driving in a careful, attentive manner. To say otherwise is to make excuses, often as a way to justify poor driving. These people are often in wrecks and call them accidents.

The Knave

patriciathomas' posts here fall into the numskull category. In this instance, she is in good company with mable8. mable 8 postulates that seat belts are dangerous. patricathomas thinks that are not very important, since if everyone one drove perfectly, there would be no wrecks (she seems to have a problem with the word "accidents"), and ipso facto, seat belts would be a useless appendage. Hey, patricathomas, can't you see the logic in the proposition that BOTH safe driving AND the use of seat belts and other protective devices (I suppose you don't care for air bags either) represent common sense protective measures. And, what's this nutty statement? "Only wrecks (not accidents) require seat belts." The degree of stupidity in this statement puts it outside the bounds of any logical and reasoned comment. It's vacuousness speaks clearly for itself. So, in conclusion, following her illogic, I will resolve not wear a seat belt; and I will remove the air bags from my car; and I will not wear a hard hat on the construction site; and I will not wear safety glasses while using a chain saw; because I am a perfectly safe person and I will only be involved in "accidents," not "wrecks.

patriciathomas

The Knave, only by intentionally misreading what I have written can you write such a foolish comment. I stated that under certain circumstance seat belts can be helpful. I never stated they were unnecessary. My comment that only wrecks required seat belts seems obvious. If you don't wreck, why would you need a seat belt? In case you do? THEN you would be well advised to wear a seat belt, and helmet, and gloves, and knee/shin guards and have a roll bar. If you're going to take safety precautions, why not take all of the important ones. While I wear a seat belt, mostly, I drive attentively. I've found not wrecking to be very safe.

patriciathomas

Makes me wonder how many wrecks you've been involved in .

Rose87

The report does not mention whether the two girls that were killed Tuesday night were related but most likely they were. My heart goes out to their families and friends. Unfortunately, I know what they are going through right now and how hurtful these comments can be. When a car hits a tree a seat belt is not much help if you happen to be in the path of the tree. The writer is just trying to prevent another fatality but it is still hurtful for the families involved, since it is so soon after the accident. It hurts when you know there is more to the story and really seatbelts may not have helped at all. I definitely believe in wearing seat belts at all times, I just think these comments get a little crazy.

patriciathomas

Nobody encourages safe driving. Just more safety devices. Oh well, what ever makes you feel safe.

carolinagirl1970

Seat belts do not save lives I lost a friend and he had his on but still lost his life. So I don't believe in them and I do not wear mine.

426Hemi

Mable, how old are you> Just an old-fashioned name? That novety way of thinking is the answer to your next accident. See you in heaven!

426Hemi

BTW, seatbelts must be used CORRECTLY for maximum protection. Kinda like a condom. Put the shoulder belt under your armpit and yes, you to could wind up with a collapsed lung. Maybe, just maybe your hubby had Osteoprosis(?) Weak bones, you know.

Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...