State reveals new test standards, curriculum

  • Follow Metro

ATLANTA --- When the dismal results from the sixth- and seventh-grade state-mandated social studies tests started rolling in, officials at the Georgia Department of Education were quick to look for culprits, State Schools Superintendent Kathy Cox told the State Board of Education recently.

They first considered that the company that provides the Criterion-Reference Competency Tests had erred in building or scoring the tests. That turned out not to be true, Ms. Cox said. State officials turned their attention to the curriculum that resulted from an effort to slim down bulky state guidelines.

"We thought we put out what were clear standards," Ms. Cox said. "But ... what we were telling the teachers to teach the students and the kind of test item that came up related to that standard, you're back to our problem of the old (curriculum)."

So the state asked a group of teachers to revamp the standards, which gained preliminary approval this month. Now online, the standards are open for public comment before final approval in August.

THE CHALLENGE for those tasked with overhauling the curriculum: Pare it down to a manageable size.

Sixth- and seventh-grade social studies largely deals with government, geography and history of other countries. So some countries would have to go. "We looked at it from every angle, and we tried to narrow the focus so that we could dig down deep and allow students the opportunity to really engage in the content," said Eddie Bennett, the Cobb County middle and high school social studies supervisor and executive director of the Georgia Council for the Social Studies.

"You can't teach everything," he said.

THE NEW CURRICULUM will have a different lead-in. Though the standards will go into effect for the 2008-09 academic year, the CRCTs in spring 2009 won't count, serving as a pilot test, Ms. Cox said.

"Then, in the spring of 2010, we'd be back to a regular administration of sixth- and seventh-grade social studies," she said.

Some, though, would like the curriculum to get an intense look each year.

"If we're going to review student comprehension and mastery every year in a comprehensive manner, then we need to make sure that we're reviewing the curriculum and the delivery of the curriculum as well," said Jeff Hubbard, the president of the Georgia Association of Educators.

Comments

jamesnewsome

It seems simple to the average person that a test needs to match the curriculum or material being taught. This year's math and social study CRCT prove that the leadership at our state's DOE does not think logically. An example is giving students a test on Italian when they are taught French and then not understanding what happened. Aren't the results predictable? The average person will say yes. Our Secretary of Education believes a study group is now needed to come up with the answer that she doesn't get. We don't need a Secretary of Education who figures out why the Titanic sunk after it hits the iceberg. We need a top educator who chart a safe course to get our students from point A to point B.

Bored in GA

When studies are taught then a test at the end of the year should not have to tell the BOE if students passed their grade! The report should be the deciding factor! No test over 3-4 days is ever going to be the effective way! LOOK at the GRADES!!!

I4PUTT

Are these test based on national standards of educations? If so the curriculum should not be pared down. It should be expanded to include what is being taught as the national standard. Makes you wonder why we score 48th out of 50 in school education. The goal for Ms. Cox should be to at least get us in the 40's in the next few years then the 30's.

niqhtraider

Just a little more of the "dumb" down in education.

griesella

The fact that so many are unable to pass a simple test is embarassing for the state. Toughen up folks, you only get one chance in this world and if go out uneducated, then you will be one of the left-behind and forgotten.

grammar police

We need national standards, not state standards. There ARE national standards out there. I haven't checked, but I pray the SS officials consulted those standards when constructing GA standards. I also believe the state is "dumbing down."

thisnthat

If we are 49th or 50th, that means there are 48 more states doing a better job than us. You are seriously telling me we can not adopt one of those states' curriculum? Find another state with a good curriculum, that meets the standards, and with good test scores and adopt their approach. State governments collaborate on ideas all the time. What is the problem? If we are not capable of doing this ourselves (and we obviously aren't because we stay in the bottom 5) then look at the top 10 and see if there is anyone close to us in poverty and socio-economics and adopt their approach!

Bizarro

"You can't teach everything" really sounds like an answer and not a cop out. And these are the people we trust with educating our youth. Some kids will do well no matter what-like mine because it is just genetics. Some will never do well and they can't help it because it is genetics and no environment will help. Those in middle need a good learning environment, because they can be pushed to excel. We need to help all three categories to meet "their" potential. There is no better of the three categories just different people have different gifts and have different skills. It should all work together for the common good. The biggest obstacle is to instill a thirst for knowledge.

Little Lamb

If you look at the national rankings and the per-pupil expenditure, you see that South Dakota winds up being the most effective state. That is, it has high scores on standardized tests AND it has a low per-pupil expenditure. So let's follow Local's idea and have Georgia model its education on South Dakota's.

Mydoggie

This CRCT test-results debacle is just the latest snafu in a history of failure of our state education bureaucracy to deal with student performance. How many times does Georgia have to rewrite its curriculum in reponse to poor test results? The "system" loves standardized testing because it produces data with which to pound on teachers and school-level administrators in the trenches. As long as the bureaucrats insist on top-down "data-driven" education as the solution to problems created by society, the system will ultimately fail again and again. It's as simple at this: Give teachers the support they need to maintain control in the classroom and LET THEM TEACH!

niqhtraider

Obama says we have 57 states, wonder which one is ranked 57th!!

griesella

LL..South Dakota has a completely different culture than we have in the south. I don't know if that means anything, but I hear the word used by the Dem's a lot. Principles are a necessary part of raising our young folks.

bone

which standardized tests, LL? 70% of GA students take the SAT vs. 4% of SD; how can anyone possibly compare the two?

disssman

I don't understand any of you. We still do not have a list of what questions were most missed. Why can't that be published? The only way we will ever find out what our kids are failing is to know the questions they miss. I am sure the answer isn't a big secret because they obviously change the questions every year, or do they? Wouldn't we be more informed of what to focus on as parents, if we knew what areas are lacking. In conclusion it is amazing that kids went to school for a year and couldn't pass a test, and yet they go to summer school for 5-6 weeks and they all pass. This kinda raises questions about the validity of the instruction being given. Were they taught the test so they could pass it?

jack

"Sixth- and seventh-grade social studies largely deals with government, geography and history of other countries." What the hell are they teaching these subjects about other countries when most don't have a clue about thier own country's government, geography or history?

jack

cappy, culture has little or nothing to do with students learning basic education subjects IF taught properly and tested properly. National vice state stndards should be the objective.

Bizarro

disssman, It is called a cover up. The state doesn't want you to know how incompetent "they" are.

griesella

jack..I was replying to why SO Dak might have a higher education rating that the south. I thought it might be the "culture" I keep hearing about that supposedly holds students back.

TrulyBlessed

jack- the government, geography and history of the u.s. the focus of of social studies in grades 4 & 5. Our kids need to know about other countries in order to succeed in a global economy. Limiting the focus of their education to the U.S. is what puts us behind other more forward-thinking countries.

Bizarro

Third world countries with the economy of a Kool-Aid stand have better educated children. I find that so paradoxical.

griesella

"The questions most missed". What is going on here. You would think the only thing the kids know is what the teacher tells them. Don't they have textbooks, use the internet, make use of the library (school and public). Why should any question on the test be the most missed. Simple answer: They never bothered to learn the answers.

niqhtraider

Cap, they didn't read the book, they just learned what was on the crib notes. Unfortunately, that was not all that was on the test!

frankclark

no blacks in SD

niqhtraiders

Keep dumbing down the smart kids and the ones who want to learn to the, well, "basic" level and low scores and the "little" disruptions, such as happened at ARC is what you can expect as the norm!!!! Oh yeah, and lets not forget the shouting and screaming at the grads.!!!

frankclark

AC, I meant no harm with my 6 o'clock post. I was merely stating that there were no black people in SD.

Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...