This just in: It's raining!

  • Follow Editorials

How can a country that consumes a quarter of the world's energy not have a coherent energy plan?

The United States, considered the world's lone superpower since the fall of the Soviet Union, is completely at the mercy of oil-producing nations, many of whom wish us ill while happily cashing our checks.

Gasoline prices have skyrocketed as the cost of oil has doubled in the past year -- and by over $10 a barrel last Friday alone.

How do low-wage workers make it? The answer: barely, if at all.

The truth is, the surge in oil prices is hurting everyone, and not just at the pump. Small businesses are struggling with costs and customers, as consumers necessarily cut back on unnecessary expenditures to pay for getting around.

In addition, we know that current electricity production cannot possibly keep up with demand. What will the summer bring? In recent years, there have been rolling blackouts in the West.

Yet, there is an opposition group to every workable energy source: America isn't drilling for oil or expanding refineries, and there hasn't been a nuclear power plant put in motion in the United States since 1973 -- despite the fact that France gets almost 80 percent of its electricity from some 60 nuclear power plants.

The United States can't even get its nuclear waste site up and running in Nevada.

While the U.S. has the largest coal reserves in the world, and it supplies more than half of our electricity, it's also an environmentally touchy source.

With global warming an increasing concern around the world, the environmental impact of energy sources will always be an issue.

Still, as Americans struggle to make ends meet and still pay $4 a gallon for gasoline, the United States won't open up its own lands and shores for drilling. Meanwhile, the government is stockpiling oil for a rainy day in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve -- over 700 million barrels, or nearly $100 billion worth.

None of this makes a lick of sense.

We need a national energy policy. Now. Or close the U.S. Department of Energy.

Thankfully, the free market is responding more quickly and sanely than the government: Demand for more fuel-efficient cars is inspiring auto manufacturers to retool, and none too soon.

But there are things the government can and should do.

We need to start harvesting the energy we have -- including in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The region already accounts for 17 percent of U.S. oil production, and is the continent's largest oil field. ANWR is about 19 million acres, but only about 1.5 million is set aside for energy exploration, and it's the ugliest, most barren portion.

We also need to ramp up production and research and development of alternative energy sources, including solar, wind and hydrogen.

Candidates for president and for Congress should be called upon to propose their own detailed energy plans for this country. It's time we had a blueprint for the future.

In the short term, the government also needs to consider releasing some of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. If they're saving it for a rainy day, we have a news flash.

It's raining!

Comments

DrGunby68

What for? the miniscule impact on our overall demand? You're right that we need a comprehensive soln, but where have those been for the last 8 years? Now that it is OBVIOUS that the Dems will take over, you'll want to compromise and be bi-partisan. Scott Mc wants to end the culture of endless campaigns now that the Repugs are no longer in charge. Dems will not compromise on ANWAR. There are cheaper, more env friendly and more promising avenues to pursue than spoiling one of the last bastions of untampered land in this country. Do something with all that coal like pay the scientists to come up with clean coal tech so that we can use it to power our fleets of electric cars that dumb%%% GM had back in the 80's.

DeborahElliott2

DrGunby, That is totally agreeable in what you said! Too bad our government has no brain to allow more exploration as all our money is going towards a war we didn't want.

DrGunby68

Sorry Deb, our money is not going towards the war. (Almost) Every war funding bill has been a supplemental, outside of the normal budget process and is being charged to my son that is yet 6 months in his mother's womb. Johnny Mc said that those that speak romantically or talk tough about war are either a fool or a fraud. Bush said the exact same thing later to the troops in Iraq/Afghan. So which is he...a fool or a fraud or both? What do you think two oilmen in office will do to rein in gas prices...N O T H I N G !!!!

patriciathomas

Great spin DrGunby68, but almost no thought. If Democrats decide to separate themselves from the enviro-nuts ( the obstructive radicals) and aid energy production (instead of continuing to block it like they've done for the past 8 years) they'll find that there'll be a huge out cry from the EPA and like minded anti-capitalists. You're right, Dems will not compromise on ANWAR or any other energy development. In fact, when the evil Bush is gone, the tax incentives on energy development will disappear and the tax on energy use will skyrocket. Prices on all goods will rise much more and much faster then they have over the past two years. How will you blame the Repugs then? As I said, your comment was great spin, but not much thought was involved.

christian134

Like I have stated before, we, the little ones on the totem pole of life in America, had better pray and pray hard for God's hand to return to our our nation and then hold on for the ride has not yet become bumpy...It will get worse if Obama's and his misfits succeed in controlling all arena's of our government...

DiSSENT

Hopefully this summit that Saudi Arabia called for will result in some changes. I think the fact that they are coming forward really says something. It is widely believed that while Saudi Royals tolerate us, they privately share similar views to their infamous exiled relative, Osama Bin Laden. Their disdain and radical views, while not blatant, has probably been noticed by other anti American governments. Hopefully that will give them some street cred. I have suspected for awhile that the rising oil prices meant that some people got smart and realized that if they could strangle our economy by producing less oil they didn't need to sponsor terrorists and thus wouldn't have to deal with the condemnation that would come from the international communities as a result. Oil has become the perfect weapon against what they have perceived as the biggest threat.

DiSSENT

@Christian134, personally I would have voted for Romney. I am not mormon but I have known many mormons and they have almost always been very strong, honest, good people. He would have been the most honest politician ever. BTW, that FLDS stuff on CNN is not the mormon church. They were a smaller splinter faction. The real mormon church is organized somewhat like the catholic church and has 11+ million members worldwide. They did practice polygamy until 1836, I believe, when it became illegal and the church banned it and began excommunicating people who continued. According to their texts the only reason they practiced polygamy was because so many of the men were dying in that period and they wanted to make sure that children had fathers to teach and take care of them.
I have had enough respect for those people that when CNN began the story and was calling the FLDS people mormons I sent them an angry email about it. Apparently, I wasn't the only one as soon after they stopped referring to them as mormon. Anyway, I also wanted to want to vote for Hilary for some reason but her smear campaign and her account of 'sniper fire' among a few others things caused me to lose respect for her.

ColdBeerBoiledPeanuts

So we don't drill for oil under our nose, but it's ok for China to do it. Come on people that is what is happening now. If someone is going to take the oil from under our shores and profit from it, it should be us and not China! It won't be long before Russia or someone else drills sideways into the ANWR also. Think with the big head people!

pointstoponder

Dr. Dunby, I will grant that W had 8 years to develop an energu plan, but the lack of a coherent plan dates back much further than him or his predecessor and the congress. Both parties share in responsibility for the debacle.

shivas

The oil from the Arctic is like the little boy putting a finger in the Dike. The conservatives just don't get it. They continue to think there's an unlimited supply of oil and we just refuse to to drill. The answer is alternative energy. Nuclear power is certainly something to pursue.

treerock

nanosolar nanosolar! 30 cents per watt of clean electricity produced versus 1 dollar per watt from polluting coal. or you can always cast off that sense of entitlement and reduce your use.

nightraider

cbbp, unfortunately, it's impossible for some among us to do that!!!!!

DiSSENT

@treerock I don't know of anyone who hasn't already reduced their use as much as possible. I know I had reduced mine alot. In fact, I'm saving more money then any of you right now! Want to know the secret? Get rear ended in a front wheel drive vehicle and don't take it in to get looked at as a precaution. Then four days later on the interstate your pretty red 2001 dodge stratus' transmission can go kaput. Then call AIG to tell them the accident caused the problem so they can ignore you even though you haven't cashed the check they sent you or signed any paperwork. You threaten them with a lawyer but they know you can't afford to follow through and Montlick & Associates isn't interested in a measly 4k lawsuit. Ironically I had just been worrying about being able to continue to afford gas. I'm saving load now for srs, lolz.

griesella

I notice that not one prson has mentioned that the high price of oil is global. European countries are striking and protesting against the ridiculous gas prices. ..Also, not one mention of the fact that Congress failed to approve an energy plan under the Bush administration. The excuse was that Cheney invited oil men to sit in on his meetings. According to the Dem's, you don't invite the people who have knowledge of the product, you invite liberals instead and let them make the rules.

mgroothand

Subject: Want $10 Gallon Gas?
Keep electing Democrats!

ANWR Exploration
House Republicans:91%Supported
House Democrats: 86% Opposed

Coal-to-Liquid
House Republicans: 97% Supported
House Democrats: 78% Opposed

Oil Shale Exploration
House Republicans: 90% Supported
House Democrats: 86% Opposed

Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Exploration
House Republicans: 81% Supported
House Democrats: 83% Opposed

Refinery Increased Capacity
House Republicans: 97% Supported
House Democrats: 96% Opposed
Source: Cspan

nightraider

dumbrock, i mean justus, haven't you heard the latest??? The pres nor the vice sets energy policy! If you really want to see wheere the problem lies, read groots 7:48. Add that to no new refinery construction in the last 33 years and, well even you justus, should be able to get the picture.

standtall

Our energy plan should be to reinstate the free market in the oil industry. Get government out of the way and the oil companies will be quick to provide energy at the levels we need via oil, coal, nuclear, wind, solar, etc. Government is not the solution - it is the problem.

Bizarro

The problem is the political stalemate we find Congress. Each side is so concerned about their political future they seem to do nothing but come up with legislation that is useless. If we had any damn sense we would keep Iraq and its oil to help bring back our economy. Snub our nose at OPEC and say whose next-Venezula is close?? We have control of an OPEC country we are now in OPEC (that would drive the arabs crazy hee,hee). We keep getting accused of imperialism so let's live up to our expectations. The environment is a great concern but after America economically fails and crumbles I doubt the new owners will give a damn.

DiSSENT

I think the real concern is if there will eventually be a world war fought over oil. Will people be that desperate? Will we? If it's going to happen in the future, that future is likely less distant than any of us would imagine. There is already so much propaganda being spread in the rest of the world where people are whispering amongst themselves believing that we invaded iraq over oil. It is extremely important that we don't get involved in an oil war, especially considering the rampant anti American sentiment abroad. I wonder if the purpose of OPEC having reduced production is not just to strangle the economies of the west and our allies, but to try and see if they can entice us into warring over those resources. Then they could stand back and point and exclaim, "OMG EVERYONE WAS RIGHT ABOUT THEM" for the whole world to hear. Then all of our enemies and perhaps some neutral parties would unite and rise up against us in a massive war. Is it probable? I can't say but I know it's possible. Can anyone else think of why they are doing this?

stillamazed

Blame the enviromentalist for our crisis, they are the ones controlling our not being able to drill for oil right here under our noses. I agree that both parties are to blame, this isn't something that just happened under the Bush administraiton. Blame Clinton for paying back favors and putting all those acres in Alaska in a reserve........-

dashiel

There's nothing like a war to make people forget they don't have jobs. Not having a home or a vehicle you can afford to drive should improve people's memories, but not the memories of people so stupid that they voted for Bush AGAIN. You may have the government you deserve, but don't blame us, we voted for Gore/Edwards. In France, the many nuclear power plants are all exactly alike. In the U.S. each nuclear plant is unique. Instead of interchangable parts and an interchangable staff of experts, we start from square one when problems develop. Good job, Brownie Brownnose.

nightraider

dashiel, no wonder this countries in such a mess with citizens like you. You voted for the Gore/Edwards ticket????? hee, hee!

grouse

What we need is a decent president.

DiSSENT

@5:00smwhr You know the Obama campaign could have put a spin on that and had a significant impact on Hilary's campaign. I'm surprised that they didn't. I am only voting for him because he is the lesser of two evils in my eyes. McCain will be the one to continue the current administration's pattern of ineptitude. Nothing against Bush as a person, I just feel that he did not have the capacity or the temperament to lead this country responsibly, without being controlled by emotion. My father is a die-hard patriot. He worked at the US Embassy in Israel for a few years before moving back to MD recently to do some pretty hush-hush work for the government when they needed someone fluent in Hebrew with an Intelligence background. A few years ago when people first started bashing GW Bush, he would viciously defend him. Now he just sits there quietly and doesn't say a word. He won't speak out against the administration because he feels it would be traitorous, but he too as lost faith. I don't think it's anyone's fault. Many people were wrong about Bush including myself. In 2005 I was still Pro-bush. I guess if nothing else I can use my age as an excuse for it.

mgroothand

China, a country not known for environmental concerns, will be drilling for oil 50 miles off our shores in the very near future but congress won't let us do that. Caribou and above ground pipelines get along just fine. I hear environmentalists and Democrat politicians taste just like chicken.

sjgraci

No word on the lack of leadership from the oil men in the oval office. No word on Cheney's secret energy policy. No word on the speculators that have driven the cost of oil up. No word on big oil that is making even bigger profits. No word on walking, riding a bike, car pooling, or public transportation. Only More Oil!

nahali

Because of the current Alaska pipeline, any oil coming from ANWAR could be online and in use within three years. Because the infrastructure already exists, it would not be very expensive at all.

dashiel

Nightwater, I don't acknowledge the reanimated dead Kennedy who ran with Edwards, but I held my nose and voted in SPITE of him, because my other "choice" would have induced projectile vomiting. I will exhibit similar symptoms when I vote in November. Sock Monkey or Penguin? Penguin or Sock Monkey?

fredinaiken

Excellent editorial. We do indeed need a realistic energy policy. Those who believe in global warming MUST push for IMMEDIATE nuclear power WORLDWIDE. We built each SRP reactor in less than a year (once we had the design). We need that kind of emphasis and priority now, NOT AN OCCASIONAL NEW REACTOR IN TEN YEARS! The problem here is that a realistic world government is needed to control the plutonium made by world-wide reactors, otherwise nuclear explosives will be as common as gun powder. We must require that our tree-hugging, Al Gore-loving neosocialists sell a world run by the UN if we are to support their global warming programs. (A UN-IRS? A UN ARMY AND FBI?) For those of us who don't believe in global warming and are terrified by the prospect of a UN world government, we must push for oil from the ground, from shale, from coal, as economics dictate, for the next century or so while we bring on substitutes like ethanol from cellulose, US nuclear power, hydrogen and electric cars for when all the coal and oil is used.

Top headlines

Michaux: Tiger-Phil duel whets Masters appetite

For all the intrigue generated by some fresh faces in golf the last couple of years, nothing injects life into a season like an old-fashioned Tiger-Phil duel.
Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...