Augusta Chronicle Editorial Staff
It's sad enough in Europe to see fewer and fewer people distancing themselves from organized religion. For example, just ask any vicar in Britain about the sad state of his or her dwindling flock.
Now family values are taking a hit across the Atlantic, and it's the British government that's delivering the blow.
In Britain, if a woman wanted to conceive through in vitro fertilization, fertility doctors were required by law to consider the child's need for a male role model in determining whether to render IVF treatment.
Not any more. The House of Commons voted recently to do away with that requirement.
How sad. And how misguided.
The requirement, argued former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith, is simply "common sense. "All we are saying is, 'Take consideration of the need of a child for a father,' not 'If you don't have a father you will never get treatment.' "
Single mothers have a difficult enough time raising children. The circumstances under which a woman ends up raising a child alone can be complex, and physically and emotionally draining.
But to have single motherhood essentially offered up by a government as a lifestyle choice? That's unconscionable. That's the British government's implication here -- that if you're starting a family in Britain, you don't need a father figure.
London's Daily Mail put it best: Fathers under this new ruling have been "effectively declared an irrelevance in modern Britain."
All this certainly is not to say single women should never be mothers. But we owe it to children, for the sake of their success and well-being, to provide them with a grounded, more traditional family structure in which to thrive.
Single moms can scrape by and make decent parents. But do you know why? Because they have to exhaustedly wield the strength of two parents. The beneficial effects of two-parent child-rearing have been documented in accumulated studies that are as common as rocks.
Yes, there are dysfunctional two-parent households, but the dysfunction doesn't lie in the fact that there are two parents -- merely in that one or both parents are unfit.
And yes, there have been many single moms who have raised well-adjusted children successfully. But technically, you also can successfully land a jet airliner using only two engines. Wouldn't the plane's precious cargo be safer and better off if both pairs of engines were powered up?
Single moms shouldn't be lumped together in general terms only to have scorn heaped on them by a misinformed public that doesn't understand each of their circumstances. So many mothers deserve better than that.
But without two positive parental role models, single motherhood is a circumstance to rise above, and it shouldn't be a goal to aspire to. Britain is enabling the latter, and its government is wrong for doing so.