The Georgia House of Representatives agreed recently with an overwhelming 120-48 bipartisan vote that sends House Bill 881 onward to the Senate. The Georgia School Board Association and other status quo defenders fiercely oppose it.
The legislation would facilitate more quality public charter schools to give parents choices that our archaic one-size-fits-hardly-anyone education system rarely does. For young people lost in super-sized schools exceeding 4,000 students or assigned to failing schools with more dropouts than graduates, charter schools provide a needed alternative.
Georgia's 71 public charter schools are changing lives for students that, on average, face greater challenges. Georgia's charter schools are more likely than traditional public schools to enroll economically disadvantaged students and those with special needs. Still, these schools' students outperform state averages on standardized tests.
Consider this example:Atlanta's KIPP WAYS School had 100 percent of its eighth-grade students meet or exceed state standards on all four sections of the state-mandated CRCT test last year. Ninety percent of the start-up charter school's student body qualifies for free or reduced lunch.
AND GEORGIA'S charter schools are doing this good work with less money than the traditional public school down the road. Unsupportive school boards exercise "local control" by providing only 70 percent of the funding traditional schools receive and no facilities funding (who really wants competition, however measured?).
Far from "trampling" local control, HB 881 pushes control to parents and communities, giving them a direct say in how their children are educated. Those with firsthand knowledge of the needs of a community's students---parents, teachers, business leaders, and other local community members -- create nonprofit charter schools and serve on their governing boards. Parents cannot get more accountability than with a public charter school. If students don't show up, the school shuts down. If the school doesn't meet high objective standards established in its contract, its doors close. What a contrast with some traditional public schools -- 26 Georgia school systems failed last year to meet federal and state standards for adequate achievement.
Hostile school boards themselves highlighted the need for legislation by rejecting outright 25 of 27 start-up charter school proposals last year, even though several received national accolades. Building Excellent Schools, a national non-profit, has pulled out of Georgia until state law changes after investing $600,000 to train future leaders of subsequently-denied charter school applications.
The public agrees. More than 72 percent of Georgians -- Republicans and Democrats -- support creating a state commission to approve and oversee public charter schools. School boards would retain their authority to open charter schools as well. This path to better education is not untrodden: Georgia lags other states in its number of public charter schools.
WHAT IS IT some school boards really fear? The scrutiny that comes from comparison? In addition to creating fine charter schools, a little healthy competition will drive stultified school systems to jettison bureaucracy and redeploy resources to truly improve performance.
The legislation keeps tax dollars in the local community to educate local children. It recognizes public school children should not be punished for exercising their choice to attend a charter school---which is, after all, a public school.
The legislation would assure tax dollars follow the child to his traditional or charter public school similar to funding for other government services, such as Pre-K. The school board does not own the money or the child.
FINALLY, I OFFER the following questions to those determined to block innovation: what do you say to the student zoned to one of the 40 high schools with a graduation rate of 50 percent or lower? Is the "local control" mantra sufficient remedy for that child sentenced to complacency and low expectations?
Georgians are hungry for real change, not simply rearranging or spending more within the same public education box. And real change must include quality public school options for parents and their children. Yes, even when the local school board finds it uncomfortable.
(The author is a Republican state representative from Milton.)