Bush has not been a bad president

  • Follow Letters

Your editorial statement that George W. Bush is a bad president ("What happened to moving on?" Jan. 26) is patently false and, absent justification, trivial.


You denigrate Bush's appointment of judges, but his selection of John Roberts and Samuel Alito for the Supreme Court are on par with William Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas. Compared to his predecessor, who preferred Oval Office sex with a minor to taking custody of terrorist Osama bin Laden, Bush approaches perfection.


When Bush took office he inherited not only the Bill Clinton recession but 9-11. Following 9-11, Bush took action: ousting the Taliban/al-Qaida in Afghanistan, warning Americans that the war against radical Islam would last years. The majority of Americans and both parties in Congress also supported the ousting of Saddam Hussein, Iraq's biggest weapon of mass destruction. But Democrats in Washington are not Texas Democrats, and congressional Democrats - with their hate-America-first, Marxist-fellow-travelers attitude - began ceaseless attacks on Bush, the war in Iraq and the military. Bush and America had other enemies - rogue elements in the intelligence community leaking national secrets to The New York Times, ever eager to hinder the war effort and cater to Marxists still grieving Ronald Reagan's defeat of the Soviet Union.


That is not all. Since the Bush economic recovery began, spurred by two tax cuts, the Democrats and leftist media, led by the Times and The Washington Post, routinely compared the economy to the Roosevelt depression years of the 1930s. Never mind that the stock market doubled since 9-11, and unemployment is at record lows.


Bush made mistakes, particularly in Iraq, but the surge under Gen. David Petraeus is succeeding despite the frothing of Democrats. You correctly note Bush's failure to curb Republicans, who spent like drunken Democrats, resulting in defeat in 2006. However, his biggest mistake was an attempt at amnesty - embraced by John McCain and Ted Kennedy - for millions of illegals, fortunately defeated by an aroused public.


Hubert Baker, Aiken, S.C.

Comments

JonnRandalphHardisonCain

THIS IS A PARODY... Bush is evil, and a war criminal! I can't tell you a law that he broke, or give any evidence that he broke it, but believe me....he's a criminal. Why.....because me and other bloggers say so! He lied to get us into war. I can't prove that, but again.....it's true because me and other bloggers say so! The surge isn't working. I can post hundreds of blogs that say that, so that too must be true. I don't care that you can counter with evidence that it IS working.....you have to ignore that, because I said it's not true. --------------------------------------------This is not Cain. No need to whine about the name I use!

tomgahunter

1st prize for fiction award winner..

patriciathomas

The MSM forms the ideas and most of the thinking of the masses. History will be much kinder to our president then the headline readers. When taxes sky rocket and the economy falls, the MSM will sing the praises of the fine management of the national economy. The escalating unemployment will never be mentioned. All of the fools will be happy.

GACopperhead

Bush's tax cuts for big business and the wealthy, his ignoring the inflated price bubble in housing, and his encouragement of loose credit standards in order to "stimulate" the economy has led us to a recession that is going to do incredible damage to those of us in the middle class. Now he is having us borrow money from .....CHINA in order to give us a tax "rebate". Hmmmmm, if the money is borrowed, who must pay back the loan? Those of us in the middle class. A wise man, somewhere, said "you can't spend you way into solvency". Leaving Iraq out of the equation, Bush has damaged the economy, allowed and encouraged the violation of our constitutional rights, has defended torture and ruined our reputation as a world leader. History will mark him as one of the worst Presidents, ever. "Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither"

edst4

ha!

Dedicated

Wa-Wa-Wa or is it Wah-Wah-Wah....either way...great letter....but since it speaks the truth you now have the left crying in their beer. The above complainers are pretty much full of it and everyone discounts their opinions but it's still nice to see them whine!

dani

Mr Baker is correct in some respects. Pres Bush hasn't been a bad president but he has been a disappointing president. So much opportunity wasted. Not all can be blamed on the president, however. >The Democrats announced 2 weeks before Pres Bush was sworn into office that they would block every conservative cabinet nominee he chose. This continued for months. Then 9/11 happened just 7 months in office, still without a full cabinet, Bush was blamed. He has been blamed for everything imaginable since. I have a longer memory than most, but the Democrats that have fought him every step of the way, know that they have hurt the country and they rejoice.

katiecaroline

Thank you dork! Freedom has it's price, and what no one seems respectful of is no matter what you think of President Bush, there has NOT been an another attack on American soil since 9/11 --- that's no coincidence. I do not agree on everything Bush has done, but all in all, he has been a good president - particularly considering our security and freedom being threatened.

NotyourDadsBuick

Bush inherited 9-11? Now that's a hoot. The partisan divide that some are now lamenting already existed when Bush came to office and was partly because of the nature of his ascent (remember the chads) and partly because Washington was already rife with venom as a result of the Clinton impeachment hearings. Mr. Bush did nothing to bridge the divide even though he held himself out as a compassionate conservative who wanted to reach across aisle. Nothing like that ever happened and the partisan animosity, as expected, got worse. Politics as usual. Many on these boards have stated this before but it bears repeating: politicians do not have the interests of John Q. Citizen in mind once they reach the White House.

dani

Buick. "Bush inherited 9-11?'" Absolutely! All that planning and training didn't transpire in just 7 short months . Any one with any brains would know that. Jan 20th until Sep 11 is not nearly long enough to organize an attack of that magnitude.

teharper428

hmm..maybe if bush would have read the presidential brief dated August 6, 2001, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike U.S."
http://fpc.state.gov/fpc/31435.htm

critter

..."rogue elements in the intelligence community leaking national secrets to The New York Times, ever eager to hinder the war effort and cater to Marxists still grieving Ronald Reagan's defeat of the Soviet Union." Gotta love that one! BTW, who was the minor? Also, the stock market doubling since 9/11...not really. It closed at 9,605 the week before after having been in the 10,000's, dropped to 8,235 the week after, and is currently at 12,200. Growth, yes, but not doubled.

dani

teh..Yes. With a time period of a whole 5 weeks he should have been able to investigate the findings, tracked down the bad guys, and put them away. Then the anti-Bush people could have claimed it never would have happened, it was all made up, that the Bush crowd is trying to use fear....You people are unreal.

mar_1081

Wow, thanks for mentioning the tax cut for the rich Copperhead. What you dont understand it is the rich who pay the most into the system and they are the ones who should get the tax break. I say we need a flat tax!

When the government encourages spending either through tax cuts, government spending, etc. the economy will will improve. Check out your local economics book.... His theory is right on target!

DeborahElliott2

To whomever wrote this letter, you are not worth getting my dandruff up! But, let me just add this, you can have your thoughts, but I am getting my finances in order so as to be a lot better prepared than to listen to the ramblings of ignorance in the White House.

giveitsomethought

When you surround yourself with dirt bags you receive dirt bag results. If the best don't want to work for you it's because you are the head dirt bag

AGR354

History will proclaim Bush as one outstanding president. To all the Bush haters, you are all Idiots, We are safer because of his leadership.

dashiel

What a refreshing letter! Bush is some kind of misunderstood genius. How could anyone regard him as a failure? A guy who never worked a day in his life, got rich off his daddy's money, lost the popular vote and ended up President! And he's done wonders for democracy. The record turnout of voters in the Primaries indicates that citizens want to make sure nothing like Bush EVER happens again. And would you old sexually frustrated and jealous neocon queens please give Slick Willie a rest? Even Solomon liked to pop some corn now and then. Get OVER it!

WW1949

Dashiel, how do you know President Bush never worked a day in his life? To Copperhead, The poor do not pay taxes- they take. The wealthy as you say pay 90 % of the taxes and the middle class pay the rest-sounds a little unfair doesn't it ?

dani

I wonder if Bill, Hillary, Obama, Ted Kennedy, any of these ever did a hard days work. Most of the politicians were either born wealthy or got rich while in public office. They are "looking out for YOU"

imdstuf

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! This letter is funny. Bush has gone after Bin Ladin? No, he went after Suddam Hussein, not quite the same. There have been no attacks on American since 9/11...I love this line. Before 9/11 were terrorist attacks a regular weekly thing? No. Think about the time between the original twin towers truck bombing and 9/11. As for the economy, I do not think either party does alot to make or break it. Its a free market economy that we the people make or break. That being said, I think both parties have to learn t try to stop raising the national debt. Clinton was better at that than Bush. There has been proof that Bush was wanting to attack Iraq before 9/11, but no one sees this as a problem. Starting war with a country unprovoked. Hmm, yeah, we are the good guys...I guess its only a coincidence that Bush, family and friends are invested in militia companies, Hallibertan, etc...do you need the clues to smack you in the face to see this whole thing was a sham?

justthefacts

imdstuf forgets about Dhahran (19 servicemen killed), Tanzania (224 killed), and the USS Cole in Yeman that killed 17 sailors. He also forgets that since 9/11 19 attacks have been thwarted by the U.S. or the bad guys as imdstuf would refer to us. Bin Ladin? He is living under a rock in the middle of nowhere. If he is indeed still alive. Politians have no effect on the economy?? Really? Interesting. Unprovoked? Never mind.

Republicant

Two things...Bush inherited 9-11? I can agree that 9-11 was a result of the U.S. arming the Afghans to fight the Russians, back in the Reagan administration. The terrorists began their fixation with destroying the WTC in 93. The masterminds of that attack were caught and dealt with. Notice that there was not another foreign terrorist attack on american soil until Republicans took office, because they knew what the response from a cowboy like Bush would be. Now they have us tied up in Iraq, a place we shouldnt be in the first place. It is a perfect breeding/training ground for terrorists. Now we cannot effectively respond to the growing threat of Iran and possibly China. Russia is flexing again. Our action in Iraq has lost prestige among other nations of the world. Our economy is in the toilet. If we need help responding to another threat, our credit with other countries will only go so far. Bad president? No question. Never been a worse president.
Also, what on earth is this moron lte talking about? Minor? She was an adult. I would rather have a pres. that does that to a woman than to an entire country. No question.

christian134

Hindsight is a wonderful thing along with couch potato wannabee's. Many people believe they could run a country better than others and they very well may be right. The way I see it is that Bush has done better than most in recent times though not very well at the moment. This country has been on a downward trend long before Bush ever took office and by the looks of what we have currently on our plate for the oval office we are burying the country into an overwhelming dark hole.

Rose

About a month before 9/11,Washington knew Bin-Ladin had said he was going to attack us.Those warnings were ignored. I regret ever voting for Bush.

WHATDIDIDO

From 1993-2001, no Terrorists attacks So does President Clinton get credit for that fact?

Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...