'Super-Important Thursday'

  • Follow Editorials

Super Tuesday may have set the foundation for John McCain's presidential nomination.


But events today may actually help determine whether McCain wins the White House.


That's because the Arizona senator will speak to the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., where he will seek the blessings of a skeptical, if not hostile, GOP conservative base.


He will need that base to win if he's the nominee. But first he'll have to convince conservatives that if he's not one of them, he can sure act like it for four or eight years.


That will take some doing, after McCain's record - which includes opposing the Bush tax cuts and being a lead sponsor of amnesty for illegal immigrants and the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law that many believe curtails free speech.


What McCain says today, and how believable he is, will have much to say about how sincerely the Republican Party would unite behind him as the nominee.


The GOP may benefit from a protracted nomination battle between Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama - a tussle that was largely fought to a draw on Super Tuesday and could last up to the party's August convention. That would give a Republican nominee time to rest, reconnoiter and replenish funds.


It might also give Republicans time to unite behind the nominee - and if that's to be McCain, then the process must start today.


Each needs the other. McCain needs conservative voters to win in November. Conservatives desperately need a candidate, after a brief flirtation with Fred Thompson and then failing to choose between Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee until late in the process - and even then splitting the conservative vote between the two.


Nor could the stakes be higher for both McCain and conservatives. Jed Babbin, editor of conservative publication Human Events, says much hinges on what McCain says today about illegal immigrants and his past support for a "path to citizenship." If McCain doesn't renounce that idea, which many consider amnesty, "he will not win over the conservative community he needs to win in November," Babbin contends.


And if conservatives ultimately reject the presumptive nominee in their conference straw poll on Saturday - now one of the most important votes left in the Republican race - then they may throw the election to a Democrat whose idea of immigration reform is driver's licenses for illegals.

Comments

patriciathomas

I tell my employees that you don't have to be a genius, just act like one. I guess that idea is the best we can hope for from McCain. He isn't a conservative, he just has to act like one. Who would rely on the word of a politician, especially over a 4 year period? If McCain puts another Souter on the supreme court will it be any better then Hillary putting another Ginsburg on the court? The next four years don't look good for America.

JohnRandolphHardisonCain

United States has the right to secure its borders. However, conservatives are in need of a reality check if they think the U.S. economy is not dependent on immigrant labor. Therefore no U.S. President is going to be able to seal the borders & deny amnesty to the millions of undocumented ("illegal" if you wish) workers already here. That would be cutting our own throat. In well documented studies Americans feel more expansive & accepting of foreigners when economic times are good. When economic times turn bad, people get more xenophobic & blame foreigners for crime, taking their jobs, ruining the healthcare system, etc. I don't support John McCain on the war. He is certainly a national security conservative. McCain is a values conservative as far as abortion goes. He has a long record of opposing abortion. McCain is not an economic conservative. He is a corporatist like the entire political Establishment leadership of this country. Global corporations need cheap immigrant labor - legal or otherwise. McCain can't turn back the tide. The best fix is to secure the borders, declare amnesty for those already here & lay out the course for "guest" workers already here to become citizens.

johnsmith

Wow, Cain, you make such a profound point. Let me paraphrase: When people feel like they're making a lot of money, they don't worry so much about a thief stealing a little bit of it. They object on principle, but it's not worth getting all that worked up about. If times change, and they suddenly feel like they have less money, and that every dollar counts, then they get more outraged about the thief who's been pilfering a few bucks here and there from them for the past 20 years. Is that about it, Cain? How about secure the borders, DON'T declare amnesty for those already there? You and your liberal crew keep coming back to the idea that some Republican out there has a secret plan to load up the trucks with illegals and ship them back. WE DON'T CARE ABOUT THEM. It's the sad fact. If they don't break some other law, we'll probably never know they're here. But if they do, stop giving them "sanctuary," and send them back across a border that is not so easy to cross. Then, stop providing any but emergency services to anyone who is not demonstrable a citizen/legal resident. No schools, no entitlements, no nothing. If they can get by under those circumstances, fine.

NotyourDadsBuick

I find it somewhat humorous that the party that purportedly is in favor of defense never seems to support the politicians that actually served in the military. In fact, Republicans actually seem to find a reason, any reason, to turn on those who have prior military experience (beyond, of course, national guard duty in alabama). There's nothing like military service to demonstrate support of the United States and everything that it represents. Except maybe a claim that someone is an evangelical. Gimme a break. I'll trust the veteran, thank you. Military service should be prerequisite for public office and for the right to vote.

Pay What U Owe

The problem with that is that as long as you have businesses willing to pay 10 times what they can make in Mexico, it's worth it to them to break our laws (not theirs, Mexico likes the money ex-pats send home to them) to come over. If they commit crimes, have accidents because they can't read our signs or understand our traffic laws, so sad to bad. Throwing them back across the border only works if the gov't is willing to lay as a heavy hand on private sector employers as they are the illegals. A "pro-corproate", non-fiscal conservative regime (THe current Commander-In-Thief defines conservative as conserving resources for his cronies) will not do that because the donors and special interests who have it bought and sold are the very ones being served by said illegal population. As long as that is true, throiwng them out wastes our effort because they will just come right back. Solve the Bush problem first.

patriciathomas

not your dads buick, Benedict Arnold was a vet. I think a little more is required then just military service, even though that is certainly a plus. Look what John Kerry turned out to be and he had military experience.

Da Voice Inside Your Head

The answer to the Illegal alien question is easy. STOP THE FLOW OF MONEY SOUTH! Do not allow money to be sent to outside the US without proving how it was earned and that the person sending it is here legally. Put a large surcharge on money sent to Mexico and places south. If they can't send the money home or it costs too much, you will see a reduction in Illegals in this country. But increasing the fines for hiring Ilegal workers will also help. But no law is worth anything if it's not enforced. Here lies the problem with the Bush adminstration. Lack of will.

Pay What U Owe

What you are proposing would be onerous and bankrupt the system. Who could keep track of all that money? What if it was someone told some crackhead that he would give him $110 to wire $100 to Mexico and have enough for one hit of "rock" left over? How many good Americans would pass that one up? The business is where the problem is. That's the fundamental economic principle. As long as demand exists, a supply will appear. No demand will kill supply.

grouse

The next four years look better than the previous seven!

He_Who_Must_Not_Be_Named

Hey Hey Patricia, Benedict Arnold was just living the American dream of making more money to provide for his family. Not unlike our "undocumented worker" friends from our southern neighbor. When you get right down to it....did he not do far more good than harm for our cause? So what if he committed a little crime like treason.

Da Voice Inside Your Head

They must prove they earned the money. How would it bankrupt the system? The Mexican system maybe. Or Western union?

LaTwon

80% of u.s. currency ever printed circulates outside of the united states. believe it or not.....................

rufus

Try snorting a line with a Euro

Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...