Fundraiser leads to donation query

  • Follow Metro

WASHINGTON - The late Rep. Charlie Norwood's campaign spent more than $63,000 for an event at a Ritz-Carlton golf resort two months after he died.

Back | Next
Whitehead  File/Staff
File/Staff
Whitehead

On the same weekend, the candidate endorsed by Mr. Norwood's family to succeed the congressman - former state Sen. Jim Whitehead - held a fundraiser at the same hotel, reports and interviews show.

Norwood officials said the events were unrelated and that Mr. Norwood's expenditures were for a reservation that already had been booked and could not be canceled. Although they declined requests for documentation, they said the spending did not benefit the Whitehead campaign.

Though they say the events were separate, the spending illustrates the extensive mingling between the two Republicans' political operations. At least six of Mr. Norwood's staffers went on to work in Mr. Whitehead's campaign. At times, they were simultaneously closing out Mr. Norwood's affairs.

Mr. Norwood, a veteran lawmaker from Augusta, had more than $700,000 remaining in his campaign account when he died Feb. 13 after a long illness. Federal law allows a variety of uses for the money, including donations to charities or limited contributions to political parties or campaigns.

But the law bars expenditures for personal benefit, and it sets a $2,000 cap on the value of gifts or contributions from one individual campaign committee to another.

Mr. Norwood's campaign finance reports show two expenditures - on April 20 and May 17 - totaling $63,200 to the Ritz-Carlton resort on Reynolds Plantation in Greensboro, Ga.

Amelia Brown, a campaign manager paid by both the Whitehead and Norwood committees in recent months, told The Associated Press the Norwood campaign had reserved a weekend package for a fundraiser at the resort a year previously and the hotel wouldn't cancel the reservation after Mr. Norwood died.

The hotel denied that account but declined to discuss it further, citing client confidentiality. Ms. Brown did not respond to repeated requests to authorize the hotel to release information about the reservation.

Ms. Brown said when campaign officials were told they could not get a refund, they invited longtime friends and supporters of the former congressman to stay at the resort for the April 20 weekend as a gesture of thanks. They used only a portion of the rooms - about 35 - the committee had reserved, she said.

"We had a lot of rooms that we had to pay for that were just going to be sitting there empty," said Ms. Brown, who was Mr. Norwood's campaign manager before joining Mr. Whitehead's team in the same role.

Meanwhile, the Whitehead campaign scheduled its own April 20 fundraising reception at the resort, with entertainment from country music singer Mickey Gilley.

Ms. Brown said the supporters who stayed on Mr. Norwood's tab did not attend Mr. Whitehead's reception or donate money to Mr. Whitehead's campaign.

"That was completely separate," she said. The Norwood event "was just random, longtime supporters of Charlie's. It wasn't Whitehead people."

Ms. Brown did not respond to requests for attendance lists for each event. And her explanation was at odds with that of Mr. Norwood's former chief of staff, John Walker, who said he was not aware that anyone had used the reservation the Norwood campaign had paid for.

"Not to my knowledge," he said, adding that he also was not aware of Mr. Whitehead's event.

Ms. Brown said Mr. Whitehead's campaign paid for its reception with its own money. Mr. Whitehead's campaign reported paying the Ritz-Carlton $2,275.75 on May 17, the same date as the second payment from Mr. Norwood's office. Ms. Brown said Mr. Whitehead's payment fully covered the cost of renting the resort's 5,400-square-foot Presidential House for the reception.

Mr. Norwood and Mr. Whitehead, both from Evans, were friends, and Mr. Norwood's family endorsed Mr. Whitehead. Along with Ms. Brown, Mr. Whitehead hired Mr. Norwood's former deputy chief of staff, John Stone, and planned to hire Mr. Walker if elected.

During the campaign, Mr. Whitehead was widely considered the front-runner and had a 4-1 fundraising advantage over his ultimate opponent, Republican Paul Broun of Athens.

Mr. Whitehead lost to Dr. Broun by less than 400 votes in last week's runoff election, according to official returns.

Campaign finance experts - speaking generally because they did not know the details of the Georgia spending - said if a campaign accepted goods or services valued at more than $2,000, it might have violated the law.

"If somebody pays for a hotel for a candidate's fundraising event, that somebody has to comply with contribution limits," said Jan Baran, a Washington attorney specializing in election law and a former general counsel to the Republican National Committee.

Larry Noble, a former chief enforcement lawyer at the Federal Election Commission, said such a scenario could turn on whether the campaign committee could get its money back and whether the two fundraisers were actually separate.

"If they could not get their money back and they invited the congressman's old friends ... you could see where they would say there was no prohibited expense." Mr. Noble said. "On the other hand, if the campaign could get the money back and instead used it for a fundraiser for another candidate, then there's a problem ... if it falls somewhere in between those two, then you have more of a discretionary issue."

Comments (8) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
WhiskyDick
0
Points
WhiskyDick 07/24/07 - 04:55 am
0
0
This doesn't pass the smell

This doesn't pass the smell test...even though I voted for Mr. Whitehead, it may be a good thing he lost the election.

LouLou
6
Points
LouLou 07/24/07 - 06:12 am
0
0
Humm "Snif" "Snif" where da

Humm "Snif" "Snif" where da rats???

WHEUBANKS
1
Points
WHEUBANKS 07/24/07 - 08:26 am
0
0
It is interesting to me that

It is interesting to me that this story does not appear on the home page at all, is on page 6-B in the print edition, and last, below the story of the Catawba cheif election, in the on line edition.

pofwe
5
Points
pofwe 07/24/07 - 08:26 am
0
0
People you ought to get on

People you ought to get on your knees & thank God that Whitehead wasn't elected. We don't know half of what Whitehead's handlers did or would do to promote their agenda. Whitehead's ads stated he was "not a politician," he's not. He's a puppet for real politicians.

sjgraci
2
Points
sjgraci 07/24/07 - 11:54 am
0
0
GOP: Good Ol' Political

GOP: Good Ol' Political corruption

tigger 2
0
Points
tigger 2 07/24/07 - 12:56 pm
0
0
Hillary would never do this

Hillary would never do this kind of thing......

rat
0
Points
rat 07/24/07 - 04:13 pm
0
0
$2300 for a reception at the

$2300 for a reception at the 5400 sq ft "Presidential House" at Reynold's Plantation? Who believes that

NedaKlugh
0
Points
NedaKlugh 07/24/07 - 08:35 pm
0
0
I think that Charlie would

I think that Charlie would have used that money for a legacy that would have made Augusta proud - too bad his "friends" are using it for their benefit. As much as I like Whitehead, perhaps it is good that he lost - Charlie would have never compromised himself or name in this way.

justus4
97
Points
justus4 07/25/07 - 05:19 am
0
0
This guy is dishonest and had
Unpublished

This guy is dishonest and had political workers to divert the funds. He just got caught. But lets follow the story and see who gets punished. Probably no one because the lie worked. Useful idiots...

Back to Top

Loading...