Did Davis witnesses commit perjury?

  • Follow Letters

There have been several articles concerning the fact that Troy Davis claims innocence in the death of a Savannah police officer in 1989. At the time, after listening to numerous witnesses, the jury found him guilty. Recently, several of the witnesses have seen fit to change their testimony.

I do not claim to know whether or not he was guilty, and that is not the point of this letter. My question is why it took 18 years for these people to realize that their testimony was false. Were the witnesses sworn before taking the stand? If not, why not? If so, why do I not read the word "perjury" in these articles?

The man has spent many years waiting for his execution because of their testimony. If he is innocent, what are we to do about the people who caused this? Even if he is still found guilty, what are we going to do with the admitted perjurers?

Dick Plummer, Augusta

Comments (1) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
patriciathomas 07/24/07 - 07:17 am
And, why would the judge

And, why would the judge accept the 18 year old memory over a relatively fresh memory? He should smell fish.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs