Switching to stronger stuff

  • Follow Editorials

Remember the underage beer party last month on the Columbia-Lincoln county line?

And remember the outrage you likely felt after learning that the reckless act of giving teenagers alcohol is only a misdemeanor in Georgia on the first offense?

Laws around here aren't tough enough when it comes to underage drinking. That applies to both sides of the Savannah River.

On the Georgia side, illegally providing alcohol gets the offender a maximum $1,000 fine and up to a year in jail - and that's on the first two offenses! Helping kids drink clearly is child endangerment, and that's why Georgia's third-offense felony punishment for this - $1,000 to $3,000 fine, and one to three years in jail - is much more befitting this crime.

On the South Carolina side, state lawmakers are working to toughen penalties through the proposed Prevention of Underage Drinking and Access to Alcohol Act - and there are many things to like in it.

The bill ups fines and introduces jail time of up to 30 days for underage possession or even attempting to buy or drink beer or wine. And for liquor? A $200 to $300 fine, and up to 30 days in jail, or both. It still falls well below Georgia's maximum for the same offense, but boosting the penalty is at least a start.

The proposed legislation also would register beer kegs, so authorities can trace them back to where they were purchased, and find out who bought them.

There are still kinks to work out, which is why the bill is back in subcommittee. But this bill could not be more important.

It would save South Carolinians so much money. Underage drinking and the costs associated with its effects - law enforcement, medical care, addiction treatment - costs taxpayers more than $837 million a year.

More importantly, it would save lives. Fewer kids drinking means fewer drunken drivers on the road. And fewer tragedies.

Hammer out the kinks and move this bill forward.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
bone
23
Points
bone 02/17/07 - 07:47 am
0
0
Stiffer penalties won't

Stiffer penalties won't dissuade adults from being irresponsible. Diminishing the prevalence of beer advertisements on t.v. and providing better education/intervention for kids would do more to decrease the glamour associated with underage drinking. Smoking is still a rebellious activity for youth, but youth pretty much have abandoned this health risk due to less exposure on t.v. and better education.

getalife
4
Points
getalife 02/17/07 - 09:38 am
0
0
I agree with bone. But this

I agree with bone. But this paper will write these editorials about these kids drinking and then turn around and publish pictures of young people in bars with drinks in their hands. This makes drinking look glamorous and it encourages them to drink. If this paper is sincere about stopping underage drinking, then it will discontinue printing the pictures of young people in these open and happy hour photos. You can't preach one thing and act another!

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs