Police procedures at issue

  • Follow Metro

ATLANTA - Neighborhood activists urged lawmakers Saturday to limit police powers in the wake of a shootout that left an elderly woman dead after plainclothes officers stormed her home unannounced using a "no-knock" warrant.

Legislators signaled they may call for tighter restrictions on how police officers use the warrants after Kathryn Johnston died and three officers were wounded Nov. 21 in the shootout during a no-knock search for drugs in Ms. Johnston's northwest Atlanta home. Family members say Ms. Johnston was 92 years old; authorities claim she was 88.

An Associated Press review of all no-knock warrants filed in Atlanta's Fulton County last year found that authorities often give scant detail when applying for the warrants, which are typically used to search for drugs and weapons.

"The war on drugs cannot be turned into a war on the community," said state Sen. Vincent Fort, a Democrat who represents the district where the victim lived.

One possibility raised Saturday was to set tighter guidelines on police use of undercover informants. Another proposal would require police to corroborate evidence from the informants before taking action.

"People throughout Georgia are at risk of excessive police practices," said Brian Spears, an attorney who specializes in police litigation. "And it doesn't have to be this way. The Legislature can take action."

Narcotics officers say they were told by a paid informant that cocaine was being sold from Ms. Johnston's home by a man named "Sam." Yet no cocaine was found in the home, and a man who claims he was the paid informant said he was told by officers to lie about buying drugs at the home.

Police Chief Richard Pennington has said Ms. Johnston's death has led his department to scrutinize all its procedures.

While the hearing focused on Ms. Johnston's November shooting death, several black Atlanta residents testified that other police tactics have prompted widespread fear among law-abiding residents.

One man spoke of how he was thrown to the street and called derogatory names when he was pulled over during a routine traffic stop. Another claimed he was humiliated by police while waiting for friends to buy groceries outside a convenience store in a suburban town just south of Atlanta.

Ivory Lee Young Jr., an Atlanta City Council member, said police need to be given the tools to root out drugs and violence without infringing on citizens' rights.

"We're here because far too often the circumstances we encounter in life force us to change our behavior," he said. "When I get pulled over, I don't move. I keep my hand on the steering wheel because my dad told me, 'Boy, if you want to live, you stay still.'"

Atlanta Police Maj. Joseph Dallas told lawmakers that police struggle to strike "a very difficult balance" between cracking down on crime and protecting innocents.

"The entire police department is right now under a microscope. And I don't mind that," said Maj. Dallas, who oversees police officers in northwest Atlanta. "It's going to find out what we're doing right - and what we're not doing right."

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
WW1949
19
Points
WW1949 01/07/07 - 01:59 pm
0
0
The no knock policy is a bad

The no knock policy is a bad policy especially if you are getting information that has not been proven right. People have guns in their home and the first reaction is to grab the gun for defense and the first reaction of the police officer is to protect him or herself from the person with the gun. IF it is the police officer that gets shot first then the other police officers will shoot and kill the person whose house they are breaking into and they could have very well gone into the wrong house. Two innocent people are then dead and it is the police officers who have commited the crime.

AugustaVoter
2
Points
AugustaVoter 01/07/07 - 04:55 pm
0
0
Might I remind everyone that

Might I remind everyone that the US Supreme Court has ruled over the past summer that police do not have to knock and identify themselves when serving warrants. From an officer's standpoint the reason for a "no-knock" warrant is so that the people on the other side don't have time to flush evidence and even more importantly, to give criminals inside a chance to set officers up for an ambush!

a different drum
26
Points
a different drum 01/07/07 - 05:16 pm
0
0
It appears to me someone,

It appears to me someone, somewhere gave false information to obtain this warrant and a person died as a result of it. This should be treated as a criminal case. It should be investigated to determine who lied and those people should be held accountable. If a person is speeding and causes an accident in which people are killed – it is called manslaughter.

mable8
2
Points
mable8 01/07/07 - 09:32 pm
0
0
I have a problem with the "no

I have a problem with the "no knock policy." It appears that the police are abusing it. I understand WHY the policy was wanted, but the USE of it indicates that the police are absing their powers of discretion by failing to check the information out first. It does not matter whether the lady was 88 or 92 [I yield to the family as opposed to the authorities in this one], the fact remains she is now deceased because the police officers failed to check on the information before they went to the home. There is absolutely no excuse for this; it should never have happened. There have been other incidents where the authorities have made grave errors in the effort to track a criminal down; one involved going to the wrong address. After trashing the house and terrorizing the family, they looked at the warrant and found the house they were supposed to be at was over 1 block. Officers, I salute you for trying to do your job in the best way possible, but do not over-step your bounds in the process. Alienating the community is the very worst you can do.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Do Georgia colleges need so many sports?

ATLANTA -- The Board of Regents auditing staff is looking at athletic programs at the 30 Georgia schools that offer intercollegiate sports.
Search Augusta jobs