Originally created 11/05/06

Aiken County election sample ballot



(Candidates appear in official ballot order)

Governor

Mark Sanford, Republican

Tommy Moore, Democrat

Lieutenant Governor

Andre Bauer, Republican

Robert Barber, Democrat

Secretary of State

Mark Hammond, Republican

Cheryl Footman, Democrat

Attorney General

Henry McMaster, Republican

Treasurer

Thomas Ravenel, Republican

Grady Patterson, Democrat

Comptroller General

Richard Eckstrom, Republican

Drew Theodore, Democrat

Superintendant of Education

Tony Fayyazi, Independence

Arnold Karr, Green

Karen Floyd, Republican

Timothy Moultrie, Libertarian

Jim Rex, Democrat

Ralph Linblad, Constitution

Adjutant General

Stan Spears, Republican

Glenn Lindman, Democrat

Agriculture Commissioner

Hugh Weathers, Republican

Emile DeFelice, Democrat

Congressional District 2

Joe Wilson, Republican

Michael Ray Ellisor, Democrat

Congressional District 3

J. Gresham Barrett, Republican

Lee Ballinger, Democrat

Lee Ballinger, Working Families

House District 81

Skipper Perry, Republican

House District 82

William Bill Clyburn, Democrat

House District 83

Don Smith, Republican

House District 84

James Roland Smith, Republican

House District 86

James E. Jim Stewart, Jr., Republican

House District 96

Kit Spires, Republican

Sadie Kirkland Wannamaker, Democrat

County Council District 1

Kathy Rawls, Democrat

County Council District 2

Scott Singer, Republican

County Council District 5

William Eddie Butler, Republican

County Council District 6

Charles T. Barton, Republican

School Board District 2

Levi Green, Nonpartisan

Vicki Simons, Nonpartisan

School Board District 3

John Wesley Hightower, Nonpartisan

L. J. Larry Murphy, Nonpartisan

School Board District 5

Ray Fleming, Nonpartisan

Thomas M. Goforth, Nonpartisan

School Board District 6

Christine B. Sanders, Nonpartisan

School Board District 7

Rosemary English, Nonpartisan

County Soil and Water Commission

Write-in

Write-in

Langley Water and Sewer Commission

Rufus G. Barrett, Nonpartisan

Bath Water and Sewer Commission

Write-in

Clearwater Water and Sewer Commission

Terry Overstreet, Nonpartisan

Belvedere Fire District

Write-in

College Acres Water District

Samuel Fink, Nonpartisan

Constitutional Amendments

1. Must Article XVII of the Constitution of this State be amended by adding Section 15 so as to provide that in this State and its political subdivisions, a marriage between one man and one woman is the only lawful domestic union that shall be valid or recognized; that this State and its political subdivisions shall not create, recognize, or give effect to a legal status, right, or claim created by another jurisdiction respecting any other domestic union, however denominated; that this amendment shall not impair any right or benefit extended by the State or its political subdivisions other than a right or benefit arising from a domestic union that is not valid or recognized in this State; and that this amendment shall not prohibit or limit the ability of parties other than the State or its political subdivisions from entering into contracts or other legal instruments?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

Explanation of above:

This amendment provides that the institution of marriage in South Carolina consists only of the union between one man and one woman. No other domestic union is valid and legal. The State and its political subdivisions are prohibited from creating or recognizing any right or claim respecting any other domestic union, whatever it may be called, or from giving effect to any such right or benefit recognized in any other state or jurisdiction.

However, this amendment also makes clear it does not impair rights or benefits extended by this State, or its political subdivisions not arising from other domestic unions, nor does the amendment prohibit private parties from entering into contracts or other legal instruments.

2 a. Shall Article III, Section 9 of the Constitution of this State be amended so as to provide that the annual session of the General Assembly shall commence on the second Tuesday in January at the State Capitol Building in the City of Columbia, but that each body shall be authorized by majority vote to recede for a period of time not to exceed 30 consecutive calendar days at a time, or by two-thirds vote to recede for a time period of more than 30 consecutive calendar days at a time, and to sit in session at the State Capitol Building in the City of Columbia, and to provide for meetings as each body shall consider appropriate, and to provide for an organizational session for the Senate in those years in which the membership of the Senate is elected and to delete obsolete language relating to earlier sessions of the General Assembly?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

Explanation of above:

This amendment permits either house by majority vote to recede for not more than thirty days at a time or by a two-thirds vote to recede for more than thirty days at a time, permits each house to meet during the legislative session as it considers appropriate, and permits organizational sessions of the Senate in the years senators are elected after the election before the next regular session the following January. The House is presently permitted to organize this way but the Senate is not.

2 b. Shall Article III of the Constitution of this State be amended by deleting Section 21, which provides that neither house of the General Assembly shall, without the consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other place than that in which it shall be at the time sitting?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

Explanation of above:

This amendment deletes a requirement that prohibits either house from adjourning for more than three days without the consent of the other house. This deletion is necessary to permit the meeting and receding provisions outlined in paragraph one. (from Amendment 2 a)

3 a. Must the first sentence of the fourth paragraph of Section 16, Article X of the Constitution of this State relating to the equity securities investments allowed for funds of the various state-operated retirement systems be amended so as to delete the restrictions limiting investments in equity securities to those of American-based corporations registered on an American national exchange as provided in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any successor act, or quoted through the National Association of Securities Dealers Automatic Quotations System or similar service?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

Explanation of above:

Currently, South Carolina's Retirement Systems may invest only in publicly traded stocks and stocks of companies located in the United States. This amendment would allow prudent investing in all stocks as a means of seeking higher profits.

3 b. Must the second through the seventh sentences of the fourth paragraph of Section 16, Article X of the Constitution of this State relating to the establishment and membership of the State Retirement Systems Investment Panel be amended by deleting these sentences thereby abolishing this constitutionally established panel?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

Explanation of above:

This amendment would eliminate the Investment Panel, an advisory body, and its accompanying expenses.

4. Must Article III and Article X of the Constitution of this State be amended to authorize the General Assembly to establish the method of valuation for real property based on limits to increases in taxable value, adjusted for improvements and losses, of no more than fifteen percent over a five-year period, unless an assessable transfer of interest occurs; to provide that for purposes of calculating the limit on bonded indebtedness of political subdivisions and school districts, the assessed values of all taxable property within a political subdivision or school district shall not be lower than the assessed values for 2006; and to provide that the General Assembly, by general law and not through local legislation pertaining to a single county or other political subdivision, shall provide for the terms, conditions, and procedures to implement the above provisions?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

Explanation of above:

This amendment will limit increases in the value of a parcel of real property for purposes of imposing the property tax to no more than fifteen percent every five years after the current value of the property has been adjusted: (1) to reflect improvements made to the parcel; (2) to reflect a decline in the value of the parcel; and (3) to reflect the value of the parcel when ownership of the property changes as the General Assembly by law defines such changes.

5. Must Section 13, Article I of the Constitution of this State be amended so as to provide that except as otherwise provided in the Constitution, private property shall not be condemned by eminent domain for any purpose or benefit, including, but not limited to, the purpose or benefit of economic development, unless the condemnation is for public use; and to further provide that for the limited purpose of the remedy of blight, the General Assembly may provide by law that private property, if it meets certain conditions, may be condemned by eminent domain without the consent of the owner and put to a public use or private use if just compensation is first made for the property; and must Section 17, Article I of the Constitution of this State be amended to delete undesignated paragraphs that give slum clearance and redevelopment power to municipalities and housing or redevelopment authorities in Sumter and Cherokee Counties; and must the Constitution of this State be amended to delete Section 5, Article XIV, which provides slum clearance and redevelopment power over blighted properties to municipalities and housing or redevelopment authorities in Spartanburg, York, Florence, Greenville, Charleston, Richland, and Laurens Counties?"

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

Explanation of above:

This amendment prohibits the State or a local government from condemning, or taking, private property for any purpose except for a public use, and says that economic development in itself is not a public use; allows the General Assembly to pass a law that allows condemnation for a private use only if the property is blighted and is dangerous to the community's safety and health and if fair compensation is paid; and deletes language about condemnation of blighted areas by some specific local governments.

LOCAL QUESTIONS (LOCAL QUESTIONS 1 AND 2 ARE COUNTYWIDE)

Local Question 1

Shall Aiken County, South Carolina (the "County), be authorized and empowered to acquire, construct and operate a water system or systems to provide for the treatment and distribution of water; provided ad valorem property taxes shall not be levied to pay operating expenses; provided, further, the County shall not be empowered to provide such services within the territory of any public service districts, special purpose districts, water and sewer authorities, or political subdivisions by whatever name designated including entities organized under Section 33-35-10 to 33-35-170, South Carolina Code of Laws, 1976, now codified as Sections 33-36-10 to 33-36-170, as amended, where such services are being provided or are budgeted, or funds have been earmarked or applied for as certified by the governing body thereof and service can be provided within a reasonable time after a written request for service has been made to that political subdivision or entity, without the written approval of such entity?

In favor of the question [ ]

Opposed to the question [ ]

If the voter wishes to vote in favor of the question, select "In favor of the question; if the voter wishes to vote against the question, select "Opposed to the question.

Local Question 2

Shall Aiken County, South Carolina (the "County), in addition to the authorization to operate a wastewater treatment facility in the Horse Creek Drainage Basin and contiguous areas previously granted in a referendum held on September 2, 1976, be authorized and empowered to acquire, construct and operate wastewater treatment facilities to provide for the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage, including industrial waste; provided, further, the County shall not be empowered to provide such services within the territory of any public service districts, special purpose districts, water and sewer authorities, or political subdivisions by whatever name designated including entities organized under Section 33-35-10 to 33-35-170, South Carolina Code of Laws, 1976, now codified as Sections 33-36-10 to 33-36-170, as amended, where such services are being provided or are budgeted, or funds have been earmarked or applied for as certified by the governing body thereof and service can be provided within a reasonable time after a written request for service has been made to that political subdivision or entity, without the written approval of such entity?

In favor of the question [ ]

Opposed to the question [ ]

If the voter wishes to vote in favor of the question, select "In favor of the question; if the voter wishes to vote against the question, select "Opposed to the question.

Local Question 3 (New Ellenton Residents Only)

Do you favor the change of the "Town of New Ellenton to the "City of New Ellenton''?

Yes [ ]

No [ ]

TOWN OF PERRY MAYOR (UNEXPIRED TERM)

Albert L. Brodie Jr. [ ]

Tony Thompson [ ]