Iraqi constitution full of flaws

Iraq's new constitution practically guarantees failure. It contains no unqualified guarantees for freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, trial by jury or the right to keep and bear arms.

A quick reading may leave one with the impression that it includes those rights. However, a more careful reading reveals that in practically every case it allows the Iraqi government to restrict and regulate that right with such words as "in accordance with the law." Just imagine what the United States would be like if our Bill of Rights contained such limitations!

The problem is that the Iraqi constitution does not recognize the correct source of rights. The Iraqi constitution is based upon the premise that rights come from the government. This contrasts sharply with our U.S. Constitution based upon the premise from the Declaration of Independence that our unalienable rights come from our Creator.

What a vast gulf of difference! Our U.S. Constitution protects our rights. The new Iraqi constitution grants rights that it can limit or revoke at any time.

The one right seemingly protected by the Iraqi constitution is protection against torture. Yet, several reports confirm Interior Minister Bayan Jabr continues to run torture camps similar to those previously run by Saddam Hussein.

So, what kind of government has been established in Iraq? The ruling party, the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, has aligned itself politically and militarily with Iran. The new Iraqi constitution may be better suited for Iran or the former Soviet Union than a free nation.

What will be Iraq's future? Would the United States have succeeded, and would we enjoy the liberties we have today, with such a flawed foundation for our government? Not likely!

Elton T. Booth, North Augusta, S.C.