Champion sprinters blaming others for positive tests

  • Follow Olympics

Asafa Powell and Tyson Gay painstakingly built their record-setting careers and untainted reputations by resisting shortcuts and exercising tight control over who gained entrance to their inner circles.

Tyson Gay (left) and Asafa Powell, world-champion sprinters, have both tested positive for banned substances and both are blaming other persons.  FILE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
FILE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Tyson Gay (left) and Asafa Powell, world-champion sprinters, have both tested positive for banned substances and both are blaming other persons.

Then they turned 30 – and with age and injuries taking their toll, they made exceptions. And now they’re paying a price.

Both sprinters have run afoul of anti-doping rules. They claim they failed drug tests because they put their fate in the hands of people they didn’t know very well.

“Sometimes, a human being just naturally, generally, trusts somebody,” explained the 30-year-old Gay, who has pulled out of next month’s world championships while the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency reviews the case against him. “That’s just what people do.”

And therein lies the problem. People can call themselves trainers, nutritionists or doctors – some with legitimate credentials, some not, but with virtually no vetting – and get close enough to gain the confidence of some of the world’s best athletes.

“There are a lot of snake-oil salesmen who end up taking advantage of the athletes, sometimes unbeknownst to the athletes,” said USADA CEO Travis Tygart.

While Gay would not reveal the new person in his inner circle, Powell and his agent have placed the spotlight on the former 100-meter world-record holder’s new trainer, Christopher Xuereb, of Canada. They are now exchanging accusations.

Xeureb was fired from the clinic three years ago, Galea’s attorney, Brian Greenspan, told The Associated Press.

Steve Roush, the former chief of sport performance at the U.S. Olympic Committee, says this ritual of the athlete blaming someone else for a doping positive is nothing new. “Most of them, it’s simply word of mouth,” Roush said. “You’ve got Marion Jones learning about it from (ex-husband) C.J. Hunter, that type of stuff. They pretty much share information. Of course, then, when something goes wrong, they immediately start pointing the finger.”

Gary Wadler, the past chairman of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s banned-substances list, said athletes are susceptible to “the culture of the guru.”

“They come to the athletes with the scientific literature, come up with some apparent justification for recommending whatever they recommend,” Wadler said. “And because it’s pronounced as the stuff to use by the guru, it’s deemed to be the last word, particularly when the guru talks in technical jargon.”

The International Olympic Committee has an Entourage Commission that tries to keep tabs on people those who surround athletes.

But its power is limited.

Australian IOC member Kevan Gosper would like to change that. He says athletes found guilty of doping violations should have more than their medals stripped away.

“It should be agreed before competitions that if an athlete is caught doping, you take the money back,” Gosper said. “If you take the money back, you cut the supply line to the entourage. You have to do something that really hurts. The cash flow goes beyond the athletes. You’ve got to hit the entourage.”

USA Track and Field has a coaches’ registry that requires background checks. The screening includes a national criminal database search and a sex offender registry search but makes no specific mention of an applicant’s past regarding performance-enhancing drugs.

USADA, which tests American athletes, has gone after trainers and coaches before, most notably when it gave a lifetime ban to Trevor Graham, who worked with Jones, Tim Montgomery and others involved in doping scandals. But among the voluminous list of resources for athletes on its website, USADA doesn’t offer anything in the way of before-the-fact vetting of athletes’ potential employees.

However, USADA does make its list of banned coaches and trainers available and Tygart is hopeful that a proposed WADA rule, which would leave athletes open to sanctions for knowingly working with support personnel who have been banned, might help regulate entourages more effectively.

“It’s something we’ve been concerned about,” Tygart said. “Currently, there is no universal certification or education provided or any licensing needed for those who treat Olympic athletes. It’s fertile ground for people who see opportunity, who see fame or fortune by associating with high-profile athletes, and sometimes they end up taking advantage of those athletes and leading them down the wrong path.”

The best way to avoid the wrong path, experts say, is for athletes to spend more time interviewing and researching any potential members of their inner circles, especially those who might be recommending which vitamins and supplements to take.

“You ask questions,” said Amy Goodson, a registered sports dietitian who is a consultant with USATF. “Ask them where they went to school, ask them what their credentials are. If it’s just a personal training certification, I’d be leery of taking the information from them. Going out of your way to ask questions is going to be your best bet.”

Often, they don’t ask enough questions.

“If you ran your business that way, you wouldn’t be in business very long,” Wadler said.

Powell’s agent, Paul Doyle, said the sprinter was referred to Xuereb through other physiotherapists Doyle’s clients have worked with in the past.

Now, it’s a relationship Powell regrets. Gay feels the same way about his connection with a still-unidentified guru who supposedly gave him the drug that caused his positive test.

“I basically put my trust in someone,” Gay explained, “and I was let down.”

That excuse has been predictable for decades – and never very credible.

“The burden is on us,” American hurdler David Oliver said. “But most athletes know what they are getting involved in, and it starts with who they claim their ‘circle’ is.”


Top headlines

Term limit for poor principals?

The Richmond County Board of Education discussed giving principals a three-year period to improve their student's academic performance on pain of possible demotion during Thursday's meetings.
Loading...