Scott Michaux

Sports columnist for The Augusta Chronicle. | ScottMichaux.com

Michaux: NCAA can't erase years of hypocrisy

Thursday, Aug 15, 2013 4:18 PM
Last updated 10:39 PM
  • Follow College

Hypocrisy is not so easily bleached.

An Aaron Murray jersey hangs in the bookstore at the University of Georgia.  SCOTT MICHAUX/STAFF
SCOTT MICHAUX/STAFF
An Aaron Murray jersey hangs in the bookstore at the University of Georgia.

Facing a potential class-action lawsuit and escalating scrutiny that could lead to a seismic change in collegiate athletics, the NCAA and member conferences are trying to whitewash their record of profiting at the expense of their unpaid labor.

This week the Southeastern Conference, Big Ten and Pac-12 joined the NCAA in announcing they would no longer license their trademarks in the popular EA Sports NCAA Football video game. The NCAA is currently besieged by a lawsuit led by former UCLA basketball star Ed O’Bannon over the alleged use of likenesses in EA Sports video games without compensation.

Last Thursday, the NCAA was publicly embarrassed by ESPN analyst Jay Bilas over his relentless all-day Twitter campaign that exposed team jerseys searchable by star players’ names on its online market, ShopNCAAsports.com. As Bilas’ exposure went viral, the NCAA disengaged the search component on the Web site.

By the end of the day, NCAA president Mark Emmert announced that it would stop selling school merchandise altogether.

Try going to the site now and you’re redirected to this message on NCAA.com from executive vice president Mark Lewis:

“Moving forward, the NCAA online shop will no longer offer college and university merchandise,” it reads. “In the coming days, the store’s website will be shut down temporarily and reopen as a marketplace for NCAA championship merchandise only.

“After becoming aware of issues with the site, we determined the core function of the NCAA.com fan shop should not be to offer merchandise licensed by our member schools.”

Issues? You think? You get the sense that the whole system of amateur exploitation is unraveling right in front of us as the powers that be try to retreat into a “we’re not marketing our student-athletes” posture that clearly has never been the case.

While the O’Bannon lawsuit – joined by six current players and awaiting a court ruling on its requested class-action status by September – has been looming as a potential nuclear option for awhile, the public pressure has only grown since the first news reports that Heisman Trophy winner Johnny Manziel, of Texas A&M, was being investigated for claims that he was selling his autograph.

If Manziel was doing that, he would face suspension for violating NCAA rules. He knew better.

But while nobody is arguing that it would be a foolish thing for Manziel to do considering the rules in place, the chorus has risen over whether the NCAA has the right to forbid a player from profiting off his own name when everybody from the coaches to the school to the conferences to the NCAA are making fortunes off the successes of its athletes.

Bilas, who had no idea he was leading a mutiny with his spontaneous Twitter rampage, voiced his concerns about the system to The Charlotte Observer.

“The problem I have with it is the rhetoric that they use and the fact that everybody in the sport, at every level, is getting compensated at market rate, and while they’re doing that they’re restricting the revenue drivers, the players themselves, from taking more than accepted,” Bilas said.

That rhetoric he objects to comes from statements like this when the SEC announced its withdrawal from the video game licensing.

“Neither the SEC, its member universities, nor the NCAA have ever licensed the right to use the name or likeness of any student to EA Sports,” it said.

That might be so – technically speaking – but it’s uncanny how the animated players wear the same jersey numbers and bear pigmentation resemblances to the real-life starters on any given team. Weird.

Is it also coincidental that when you walk into the university bookstore at Georgia that the racks are stuffed with jerseys that mostly seem to have the number 11 on them? They might not say Aaron Murray on the back, but the association with the star quarterback is clear. Same goes in Columbia, where there seems to be an abundance of No. 7 jerseys (Jadeveon Clowney?) for sale everywhere.

It’s really a house of cards that all the scrutiny further threatens.

“It shines an even brighter spotlight on the NCAA’s system of ‘amateurism’ that is under significant attack both legally and politically,” wrote Yahoo’s Dan Wetzel, who wrote the book exposing bowl corruption and misinformation that helped lead to the end of the BCS. “The NCAA is the last major athletic organization to attempt to keep its adult athletes from being paid or profiting off their own fame and accomplishment.”

The NCAA can’t erase years of hypocrisy by no longer selling jerseys or not authorizing use of its logos in a video game. The damage is already done and the system is justifiably heading for a rude awakening.

Comments (7) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
rmwhitley
5547
Points
rmwhitley 08/15/13 - 06:14 pm
0
0
mark emmert
Unpublished

of the left coast thinking needs to hang up his spikes and return to being the president of a lefty university.

Young Fred
17860
Points
Young Fred 08/15/13 - 07:20 pm
2
0
I must be missing something.

I must be missing something.

Most of the athletes get scholarships which is a form of compensation. Tuition being pretty hefty, especially at top tier schools.

I don't really see how it could be harmful to the player if jerseys with their number is sold or if a video game depicts "animated players wear(ing) the same jersey numbers and bear pigmentation resemblances to the real-life starters on any given team.

It seems to me such things would make a player more popular and marketable when they look towards a professional career.

Besides, doesn't the school as a whole profit from their sports program, enabling them to offer more non-athlete scholarships?

csrareader
1287
Points
csrareader 08/16/13 - 07:29 am
1
0
The approximate cost of a

The approximate cost of a four-year degree at the University of Georgia is $110,00 for an in-state resident and $161,000 for an out-of-state resident. The best football players are on 100% scholarship. Tell me again how the NCAA is taking advantage of these young men?

bdouglas
5377
Points
bdouglas 08/16/13 - 09:04 am
3
0
I think what's at issue is

I think what's at issue is the fact that you've got coaches and athletic directors making millions of dollars a year, NCAA raking in millions of dollars a year (nearly $875 million last school year alone), schools making millions of dollars a year (SEC schools EACH average over $17 million per year from TV rights alone!)....all off the performance of these athletes. Yes, the free education is absolutely awesome, but it rather pales in comparison to what they are bringing in for everyone else's pockets.

rmwhitley
5547
Points
rmwhitley 08/16/13 - 06:23 pm
0
0
When you factor
Unpublished

in that most student-athletes playing basketball and many playing football can't even spell their own names much less the university at which they attend for 1-2-3 years, the free "education" should be more than enough re-imbursement.

gargoyle
18527
Points
gargoyle 08/16/13 - 06:48 pm
0
0
The NCAA tried to burn the

The NCAA tried to burn the candle at both ends claiming to be in it to keep armature athletics pure while marketing athletes. It isn't hard to see how out of touch they have become to the schools , athletes and sports they sanction. The NCAA has become a body of edicts to keep the governing body alive no more no less. Their leadership got caught up in the money trap where they must impose fines and extort to keep the leadership in the manner they want kept. Time for the Big House schools to reject the NCAA is coming and the change of guard is needed.

Young Fred
17860
Points
Young Fred 08/16/13 - 08:05 pm
0
0
I understand that hundreds of

I understand that hundreds of millions are being made. Like I said this can only help the schools, right?

gargoyle

You'll have to excuse me, I'm not up on the intricacies of the NCAA, so I'm not quite catching your drift.

I guess I'm just concerned that college sports my end up getting "hurt" by all this. I know a lot of people are making a scads of money off these athletes, but the schools do seem to be benefiting.

Radwaste
410
Points
Radwaste 08/16/13 - 09:26 pm
0
0
Be fair. Be real.

And notice that if a star gets a scholarship for football, and the NCAA gets paid millions for selling items tied to his fame, you only have to look for the sales of science-department merchandise from the same school.

There isn't any.

What you're doing is deciding all on your own that some player is only worth their scholarship. That's EXACTLY like having someone else say that YOUR income should be limited - what you get now, what you have is all that you should get.

Okay. Step right up and tell me I can sell a million jerseys with your picture on it and not send you a dime. Somehow, I don't think you'll agree.

Young Fred
17860
Points
Young Fred 08/17/13 - 03:47 pm
0
0
Rad

They know the rules before they sign on. I maybe could take you a little more seriously, except I know your overall negative view of college sports.

Do you seriously believe college sports should become professional?

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs