HARRISBURG, Pa. — The lawyer brought in by Penn State to help settle Jerry Sandusky-related claims said Monday that he recently gave university officials monetary settlement offers from most of the people asserting claims related to the child molestation scandal.
Attorney Ken Feinberg said he delivered the demands to Penn State administrators, lawyers and members of the board of trustees during a meeting Friday.
“The next step is Penn State – we’ll see how Penn State responds in the next few weeks,” Feinberg said.
Asked about the meeting, a university spokesman declined to comment. Reactions by lawyers for the claimants ranged from hopefulness to no comment. None would say what dollar figure he or she is seeking.
Feinberg “has assured us that within a degree of somewhat certainty, like 85 percent, he thinks he can get our case settled,” said Harrisburg attorney Chuck Schmidt, whose client’s lawsuit is on hold. “So far as it moving forward, I’m cautiously optimistic.”
Bala Cynwyd lawyer Mike Boni, who represents Aaron Fisher, the young man known as Victim 1 whose story launched the investigation and successful prosecution of Sandusky, said Feinberg’s response to his settlement offer was “hope springs eternal.”
“He said what he had to say, which is, ‘You’re asking for too much, I’ll see what I can deliver,’” Boni said. “At the end of the day, I don’t think we’re all that far apart.”
Sandusky, 69, is serving a 30- to 60-year prison term for the sexual abuse of 10 boys over 15 years, including attacks on children inside Penn State athletics facilities. Penn State’s president issued a statement the day Sandusky was convicted in June, vowing to settle “privately, expeditiously and fairly.”
Feinberg disclosed last month that he was working with 28 claimants, 10 more than were the subject of Sandusky’s criminal trial. He emphasized Monday that not all claimants have made a settlement demand.
Also Monday, a Penn State trustee called on the university governing board to re-examine the findings of former FBI director Louis Freeh’s school-sanctioned investigation into the scandal.
A critique released this weekend by Joe Paterno’s family raised “serious and troubling” questions about Freeh’s findings.
Former U.S. Attorney General Dick Thornburgh was among the experts brought in by the Paterno family to review the Freeh report, which concluded that Paterno and other university officials covered up allegations against Sandusky to spare the university bad publicity. The family’s review said the cover-up claims were inaccurate, were unfounded and equated to a “rush to injustice.”
Freeh has defended his work and stood by his findings. He has called the Paterno family’s review self-serving and a campaign to shape the late Hall of Fame coach’s legacy.
Paterno died in January 2012 at age 85.
The NCAA levied unprecedented sanctions on Penn State less than two weeks after Freeh released his stinging findings in July.
Freeh’s firm was hired by the board of trustees to perform “an independent, full and complete investigation of the Sandusky scandal,” said Clemens, a trustee since 1995. “In addition to questions about accuracy and fairness, there is little question that the Freeh report is less than complete.”
Penn State said Sunday that Freeh was brought in to conduct an independent investigation of the school’s response to the allegations, and not actions of entities unrelated to Penn State. Freeh offered 119 recommendations to strengthen governance and compliance, the majority of which have been implemented, the school said.
Freeh’s report has never been formally discussed by the board as a whole. At the time of its release, trustees said they had accepted responsibility for failures of accountability.
Paterno’s family offered its response to the Freeh report on Sunday, attacking what it called flawed techniques and a lack of evidence.