Scott Michaux

Sports columnist for The Augusta Chronicle. | ScottMichaux.com

Media scrutiny, public opinion killed BCS

  • Follow College

Seeing them all lined up like the BCS Club of Villains having to confess their sins as they pulled the plug on the most ridiculous postseason in sports was satisfying.

But it was these words from chief villain Jim Delany, of the Big Ten, that were most delicious.

“The drumbeat of criticism was so significant over time that it forced the change,” Delany admitted.

That was certainly a vindication for everyone involved in what one sportswriting colleague called “an effective guerrilla media campaign” that ultimately toppled the BCS. For much of the past 14 years, newspaper columnists, talk radio hosts and TV commentators have worked overwhelming public sentiment into such a froth that the Delanys of the world could no longer ignore the wishes of the majority.

On Wednesday, after months of meetings and deliberations, the BCS conference commissioners and Notre Dame’s director of athletics unanimously endorsed a four-team playoff model for college football that is about 140 years past due. The consensus structure must still be approved by the BCS presidential oversight committee next week, but it’s very likely they will rubber-stamp the death warrant to a flawed system that has left fans dissatisfied since 1998.

The first legitimate college football national champion should be recognized after the 2014 season.

“I’m sure it won’t satisfy everyone,” Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said. “Until you have an eight-team or 16-team seeded playoff, there will be folks out there that aren’t completely satisfied. We get that. But we’re trying to balance other important parties, like the value of the regular season, the bowls, the academic calendar.”

Those of us who have pounded the drumbeat appreciate that. The four-team format isn’t perfect and will almost certainly be expanded eventually to account for more worthy conference champions once everyone involved gets a whiff of the money a playoff will generate well beyond the revenues of the current bowl system.

But this is a great first step, and it’s thanks to the media and fans for pounding it through the thick skulls of the BCS cartel leaders.

Thanks should ring out for Dan Wetzel, Josh Peter and Jeff Passan, the three Yahoo reporters who collaborated on the brilliant book Death to the BCS that prominently exposed all the dirty little secrets of the bowls. The list of drummers is a long one, including regional percussionists Jeff Schultz, Dennis Dodd, Tony Barnhart and Mark Schlabach. The Associated Press refusing to let its poll be part of the charade was a big blow to the legitimacy of the rankings-based system.

But a personal bit a gratitude goes to the editors here in Augusta, who have indulged my own obsession with this cause for more than 11 years.

A cursory archive search of my name and the word BCS came up with 183 stories dating back to 2001. In fact, it goes all the way back to my first column.

Seriously, the very first opinion – right after the words “I hold these sporting truths to be self-evident” – in my introductory column at the Chronicle on Feb. 11, 2001, was this:

“That the President of the United States and the NCAA football national champion should not be decided by computers and the state of Florida.”

That was just one line. In the years since, thousands of words and hundreds of column inches have been devoted to the subject. The frequent headlines on the repetitive pounding of the theme certainly sounded like a drum roll:

Playoff system would end criticism once and for all ... A bowl system with integrity? Not as long as money talks ... Spoilers make BCS look worse ... Close your eyes, think of playoffs ... Even the old way was better than BCS ... BCS should stop and ask for directions ... BCS continues to drop crystal ball ... BCS has spoiled memorable year ... Boring bowls proving system’s lost relevance ... Who will stand up to bullies in BCS? ... Not even Obama can change BCS ... Fans should ignore flawed bowl system ... ‘Death to the BCS’ exposes bad system ... Let’s all root for BCS chaos.

That’s just a small sample of the on-going “guerilla campaign” in this little corner of the college football world.

The BCS tried to wage its own propaganda campaign with disingenuous talking points and a limited cabal of like-minded journalists who somehow fell for the ridiculous pitch that crowning a true champion via a playoff would ruin everything. Whenever in need of a good laugh, you could always click on the “What They’re Saying” tab on the official BCS Web site and listen to the one-note chorus that had no backbeat of drums.

Despite many times when it seemed like the rest of us were all just tilting at windmills, in the end ration and reason had to prevail. It usually does.

And so we saw that sinister BCS brain trust gathered behind the podium (we’ll excuse the Southeastern Conference’s Mike Slive from the criticism, and to a lesser degree the Atlantic Coast Conference’s John Swofford, for trying to push this domino for years) telling us how well they collaborated for the good of the game.

I’m sure once all their conferences are rolling in the absurd money that a four-team playoff will make, they’ll be crowing about what a great idea they had. But we’ll all know it was the rest of us who drummed that crowd-pleasing money-maker into their heads.

Comments (9) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Just My Opinion
6064
Points
Just My Opinion 06/22/12 - 03:42 am
0
0
I can sum up Scott's article

I can sum up Scott's article in 4 words...."I told you so.".

Riverman1
89986
Points
Riverman1 06/22/12 - 05:47 am
0
0
Wonder what the implications

Wonder what the implications are to the Big 12-ACC with Clemson and Fl State?

justthefacts
23712
Points
justthefacts 06/22/12 - 06:16 am
2
0
So?

Does this stop the arguing? No. 4 teams isn't enough. Can't wait to hear the angst when Boise State is undefeated and ranked 5th by this commitee. In two years it will be 8, then 12. Eventually, like the NFL, the regular season will mean nothing, especially, non conference games like UGA/GA Tech. When it happens, who attends these games? How many UGA fans can with two/three day notice, can take off to Detroit for the Champ game? especially if they just got back from New Orleans for the semis.So, who attends? Corporations and locals who could not care less who wins.

avidreader
3442
Points
avidreader 06/22/12 - 09:56 am
0
0
To justthefacts:

excellent response!

Riverman1
89986
Points
Riverman1 06/22/12 - 10:40 am
0
0
Bowl games are at neutral

Bowl games are at neutral sites too. The two playoff games for the the top two spots will be at rotating bowl sites...right?

Okay, so now we have a conference championship game, a game between the SEC-Big 12 (that's still on right), a play off game and then the championship game. Geez. That's 4 extra games. Pity the players. This will stretch it to Feb., almost year round football. Anyone ever played and felt the effects of a season? With spring and summer practice, it's impossible for those kids to realistically study.

justthefacts
23712
Points
justthefacts 06/22/12 - 10:47 am
1
0
In Reality

River, no one is thinking of "the kids" or the fans. Money is the motivator behind this latest development.

Scott Michaux
181
Points
Scott Michaux 06/22/12 - 12:51 pm
0
1
Yes, I told you so. I have no

Yes, I told you so. I have no doubt these playoffs will eventually expand to 8 teams. That's a good number and it really doesn't need to get any larger.
As for SEC-B12 bowl, that's exclusive of the playoffs. If champs are in the playoffs (which they will be), other teams will be picked for the SEC-B12 bowl.
And stop worrying about "the kids." Nobody seemed to worry about them when they added a 12th regular season game. Frankly, they should go back to 11-game seasons, play your conference title game in that 12th week and play quarterfinal (assuming it ever goes to 8) games the week after on the home field of the higher seed. Then play the semis around New Year's and the championship a week later. That would be 15 games for the finalists, which is one less than Division I-AA champs play now.

itsanotherday1
46670
Points
itsanotherday1 06/22/12 - 07:20 pm
0
0
I would not have a problem

I would not have a problem with an 11 game schedule.

Riverman1
89986
Points
Riverman1 06/23/12 - 05:33 am
0
0
I wonder if they may even

I wonder if they may even drop the SEC-Big 12 game now? It was probably only created to make it the de facto national championship game.

But know what else ticks me off? We see where commissioners of major conferences and NOTRE DAME decide this and that. When's the last time ND did anything significant? Our weakest SEC team could make those gold helmets turn to rust.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Venue change sought in Aiken police slaying

Judge Clifton Newman told attorneys for Stephon Carter that a motion to move the venue or select jurors outside Aiken County was premature. Carter is accused of killing Public Safety Officer ...
Search Augusta jobs