Bill in Congress jeopardizes Savannah River

  • Follow Opinion columns

Our waterways are the lifeblood of our communities. They provide us with our drinking water, dilute our waste, move our cargo and nourish our souls.

It was almost 40 years ago now that we as a nation decided regulating the discharges into our crucial waterways made sense. The Clean Water Act of 1972 has greatly improved our rivers and streams. Take our beloved Savannah River. She may still have her problems, but she is drastically cleaner than she was just 30 short years ago.

And if some in Congress have their way, we could soon begin heading in the opposite direction.

AN AGGRESSIVE movement is under way to dismantle this federal law that has served to protect our rivers and ourselves from pollution. The Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act -- House Resolution 2018, scheduled to be presented to the congressional floor this week -- proposes to gut the Clean Water Act and jeopardize the gains that we have made over four decades.

Proponents of H.R. 2018 will tell you the federal government shouldn't have oversight of the states and their water programs, which vary greatly in standards and enforcement. Individual states would be free to use and abuse our rivers based on their perception of what is right. They could choose to ignore the needs of those downstream and in neighboring states despite the consequences.

No consideration is even given to the conflicts that would arise when rivers are shared between two states. This movement would wreak havoc on our river, not to mention the issues in Atlanta, leaving no one in charge of actually regulating what is being put into our dear Savannah.

So, exactly what does this "rule" do? It will:

- prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from stepping in if a state fails to adequately protect our waterways from pollution;

- discourage informed decision-making on federal permits that impact water quality and public health;

- prevent the EPA from updating outdated and ineffective water quality standards;

- undermine the EPA's ability to protect states from cross-border pollution.

Proponents are claiming this rule would help "save taxpayer money." They claim this will streamline processes and make permitting move through faster. Again, I ask one simple question: What about rivers shared by two or more states? Those rivers will be quickly tied up in legal battles, which are costly to say the least.

THE SNAKE-OIL salesmen behind this bill are trying hard to protect their fiscal interests in coal mining projects -- in fact, they don't even try to hide it. It is clearly stated in their "determination of need" for the bill. Their shortsighted desires to protect their monetary interests will effectively hog-tie all of the progress happening on our river, and lead us down a path of state vs. state legal battles for years to come.

Can you imagine the race to the bottom that would ensue as states agreed to lower their water quality standards to attract new industries? This bill is cronyism at its worst, and we the citizens are the ones who are going to lose. This bill must be stopped!

The strength of the Clean Water Act lies in its balance of shared authority between the federal government and the states, which too often face pressure by special interests to weaken water quality standards in the name of short-term financial gain -- and with long-term damage to our waterways.

By every objective measure, the Clean Water Act works. Let's not deny Americans, and especially our fellow Georgians and South Carolinians, the basic right to clean water.

Please contact your congressional representatives and urge them to oppose H.R. 2018. See www.congress.org.

(The writer is executive director of Savannah Riverkeeper.)

Comments (5) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
avidreader
3078
Points
avidreader 07/17/11 - 11:37 am
0
0
I'm with you, Tonya.

I'm with you, Tonya.

EEreader
27
Points
EEreader 07/17/11 - 01:15 pm
0
0
Perhaps a letter similar to

Perhaps a letter similar to the below to your congressional representative would be helpful:

to: https://jeffduncan.house.gov/contact-me/email-me

Dear Representative Duncan: According to an article in today's Augusta Chronicle, by
Ms. Tonya Bonitatibus of the Savannah Riverkeepers, a resolution, HR2018, is scheduled for presentation to the House this week.

According to Ms. Bonitatibus:

"AN AGGRESSIVE movement is under way to dismantle this federal law [THE Clean Water Act, PL 92-500] that has served to protect our rivers and ourselves from pollution. The Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act -- House Resolution 2018, scheduled to be presented to the congressional floor this week -- proposes to gut the Clean Water Act and jeopardize the gains that we have made over four decades."

Ms. Bonitatibus goes on to say:

"So, exactly what does this "rule" do? It will:
- prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from stepping in if a state fails to adequately protect our waterways from pollution;
- discourage informed decision-making on federal permits that impact water quality and public health;
- prevent the EPA from updating outdated and ineffective water quality standards;
- undermine the EPA's ability to protect states from cross-border pollution."

If Ms Bonitatibus's assertions are correct, in whole or, substantially, in part, I totally agree with her and ask that you oppose this bill with prejudice on my behalf. And, while you are supporting this request, kindly tell the bill's sponsors to take their special interest cohorts and go take a refreshing dip in what's left of the "Love Canal," a prime example of the results of one individual state's regulations.

Stephen V. Geddes
Augusta Environmental News Examiner
http://www.examiner.com/environment-in-augusta
SC Congressional District 3
Aiken, South Carolina

gaspringwater
3
Points
gaspringwater 07/17/11 - 03:38 pm
0
0
A Florida Republican and a

A Florida Republican and a West Virginia Democrat sponsored the “Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011 and it passed the Republican dominated House of Representatives. It's an industry friendly bill that'll increase pollution in the nation's waterways. A spokesman for the West Virginia Coal Association praised the bill. And coal is the nation's premier polluter. But the Bill now faces environmentally conscious Democrats in the Senate and President Obama has criticized the Bill too. So there's hope Republicans won't be allowed to foul the country's waterways for business profits. The Clean Water Act of 1972 substantly cleaned up rivers and this legislation is a return to the dirty past.

Riverman1
81494
Points
Riverman1 07/17/11 - 04:28 pm
0
0
We have made amazing progress

We have made amazing progress cleaning up our rivers the past few decades. Living on the banks of the river used not to be such a good thing when raw sewage and industrial waste flowed freely. Protect our river.

robaroo
708
Points
robaroo 07/17/11 - 05:59 pm
0
0
Now there are two important

Now there are two important measures in front of congress. They must pass the the balanced budget amendment, and they need to reject the Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs