Graham achieved little

  • Follow Letters

It doesn’t take a cynic to see through U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham’s pro-life rhetoric.

If Sen. Graham is such a staunch friend of the unborn, then why did he vote to put Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan on the Supreme Court? Those two justices are firmly committed to the twisted constitutional logic of Roe v. Wade.

If this is such a concern to Sen. Graham, then why has he never tried to limit the federal courts’ appellate jurisdiction over abortion cases?

Article III Section 2 of the Constitution clearly gives Congress the power to limit the Supreme Court’s power over the cases it may choose to hear.

In truth, Sen. Graham cares little about his pro-life constituents. Instead, he uses his pro-life rhetoric to rally conservative Christians come election time. To Sen. Graham, social conservatives are little more than electoral cannon fodder. Once safely elected, he does nothing to advance their agenda.

Sen. Graham’s nominal championship of the pro-life cause is cynical politics at its worst. Look not at what he promised, but at what he accomplished. After 20 years in Congress, it’s been zero.

Comments (1) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
GiantsAllDay 05/02/14 - 07:21 am
Hey, Graham continuously

Hey, Graham continuously votes to throw taxpayer $$$ at MOX. Isn't that pro life?

Butterman 05/02/14 - 11:28 am
Lisping Lindsey

Is as Pro Big Government as they come.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs