MOX plan should proceed

  • Follow Letters

When I was deputy commissioner of environmental conservation in Alaska, we had an environmental problem of note. Seems a farmer had 13,000 chickens that had died. Being the dead of winter, the farmer didn’t want to do anything about them. So the state was left with a huge mass of frozen chickens that were bulldozed into a pile and left. As spring was approaching, we had to do something with these chickens, or when they thawed it would be an awful mess.

Such is the problem the country faces with the stoppage of mixed-oxide fuel funding – only on a more massive and serious scale. In putting the project in “cold standby,” the U.S. Department of Energy basically is saying: Let’s just let the plutonium accumulate in the state of South Carolina, and do nothing, but create a committee to re-study the situation. And then, after “x” years (you fill in the timeline), maybe we’ll come up with another solution.

We, as taxpayers, have spent $3.8 billion, the project is more than 60 percent completed, and the DOE wants to stop it and create another environmental problem. What is up with this? Has the DOE succumbed to the radical environmentalists again?

The DOE has signed an agreement with the state of South Carolina that the plutonium gets out of the state as soon as practicable (dispositioned).

MOX should proceed with no more delays in this environmental problem and not create other problems by waiting.

The state of Alaska went to court and forced the farmer to clean up his dead chickens. Maybe the state of South Carolina should do the same.

Christopher Noah, Ph.D.

Evans

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
SCEagle Eye
914
Points
SCEagle Eye 03/17/14 - 07:56 am
3
2
MOX madness

Why did Senator Graham help kill immobilization of plutonium and choose the most expensive option - the failed MOX project? If immobilization had been implemented years ago we'd be far down the road with plutonium disposition. And what's the deal with the mismanaged MOX project being "60 percent completed"? That's the figure that's been used for two years so sounds like it's been pretty much stalled for the last years. This should be investigated, right?

GiantsAllDay
9578
Points
GiantsAllDay 03/17/14 - 08:39 am
0
4
PhD: Piled higher and deeper.

PhD: Piled higher and deeper.

KSL
129190
Points
KSL 03/20/14 - 01:54 am
0
0
That comment miss becomes

That comment miss becomes you.

KasparHauser
364
Points
KasparHauser 03/23/14 - 04:15 pm
0
0
Reality Bites
Unpublished

Just how is Plutionium, naturally decaying away, going to 'accumulate' in SC, Mr PhD?

Also, just for general knowledge, I think the vitrification process could not as strongly assure the material could not be retrieved and used later, as MOX sorta better does.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs