Boss isn't morality judge

  • Follow Letters

On Jan. 6, The Augusta Chronicle published an editorial titled “What freedoms will be left?” It talked about how providing birth control as part of mandated health insurance is an infringement on religious rights. This isn’t a new debate, but I wanted to share some thoughts on the matter.

First off, I’m generally a believer in smaller government. The real debate should be about whether government should be telling businesses they have to provide health insurance in any capacity. That being said, I’m really not sure why people think that letting people get birth control as part of their health plans is some major infringement on their own religious liberties.

The writer of this editorial talks about it like the government is force-feeding everyone birth control. It should be pointed out that just because it’s an option on someone’s health insurance doesn’t mean they have to use it. Those individuals still have their own choice of whether or not they want to take birth control.

It also should be noted that most religious people aren’t opposed to birth control. Most of them are opposed to sex out of wedlock. This means there are many people who believe it’s morally acceptable for some to take birth control but not others.

The question I have would be: Why is it my employer’s job to make my moral decisions? If we’re letting our employers have the full moral authority then you leave it open to allow forms of discrimination. For example, maybe I own a business and I want to give my married employees access to birth control but not the unmarried ones. Should I be allowed to be that kind of moral authority? Also there are some people who don’t believe in modern medicine at all, as per their religious beliefs. Does this mean these people should be exempt from providing health insurance to employees altogether?

Bottom line: If companies are going to have to provide health insurance, it shouldn’t be any boss’ job to make the moral decisions of his or her employees.

Dallas Duff

Evans

Comments (59) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
carcraft
27884
Points
carcraft 01/10/14 - 07:41 pm
0
0
WBC Just ignore the fact that

WBC Just ignore the fact that an employer is willing to pay more for HIS moral choices. A choice by Christians to support a food bank to feed the poor costs them money. People who give up lucrative jobs to go into philanthropy make a moral decision that costs them money. Sk please explain to me why YOU feel the government can interfere in the negotiations between an employer and the employee over work benefits.

InChristLove
22481
Points
InChristLove 01/10/14 - 10:44 pm
1
0
WBC, let me ask you a serious

WBC, let me ask you a serious question and hopefully you will have the integrity to answer honestly....in the situation where the Catholic Nuns do not want to have to purchase an insurance plan that covers birth control, if they are true to their vows , they will never have any need for birth control. And since this is true, then why force the nuns to purchase insurance that covers this provision?

The only reason for the law to require them to purchase health insurance that covers contraception is to force them to pay for contraceptives used by others. That is wealth distribution pure and simple.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Georgia Regents' hospital plan chosen

Georgia Regents Medical Center won a lengthy and hardfought battle over two other Augusta hospitals to build the first hospital in Columbia County, the Georgia Department of Community Health ...
Search Augusta jobs