When governments practice redefining of terms, they can do the very things they condemn others for doing.
Take President Obama’s attitude against Syria’s use of chemical weapons against innocent people. At the very moment Obama is condemning another country for practicing chemical warfare, by allowing abortion he is doing the very same thing – he just says it’s different with him.
Suppose Syria puts its foot down on the United States because Obama heads a country that allows the use of abortifacient drugs against innocent persons on a much greater scale than Syria? Somebody needs to tell the president of Syria what horrific genocide is being done by the president of the United States against innocent unborn babies – or does that group not deserve protection from chemical weapons?