Candidates slammed unfairly

  • Follow Letters

I read Sylvia Cooper’s City Ink’s column May 26 (“Qualifying ended, but the political games continue”) and realized that regardless of what we say here about advancing our community, there are those among us who relentlessly strike the chord of division and class warfare.

In our sheriff’s race, there are six candidates. Four I know and the other two I’ve never met. The office of sheriff should absolutely be nonpartisan and, as I’ve stated before, the two major political parties have divided our community like no other. Our community would ultimately be better served by electing our sheriff with a simple majority vote, therefore freeing candidates to advance their visions and philosophies and not be beholden to the party status quo.

Ms. Cooper very efficiently endorsed her choice, discredited her least choice and gently pushed aside the other four. Since when did Ms. Cooper become an expert in community policing? And if any candidate is not considered the “chosen one,” then he had better be prepared to receive the wrath of her pen. Make no mistake about it: We all have things in our past, and if she is going to go about the business of exposing candidates’ shortcomings, then she’s fallen way short of that task. If Ms. Cooper would have really been unbiased in her reporting of candidates past and present, then The Augusta Chronicle couldn’t have printed enough issues, for they would’ve sold out in minutes.

I’ve always felt that the media were established as neutral voices in the community, but clearly that standard has been trampled upon. To be fair, there are journalists throughout our nation who choose the route of sensationalism and status quo because controversy sells.

That is another reason why our community in general has become more dysfunctional and divided. Many citizens/journalists in our country have a misguided understanding of free speech, and it is quite possibly the most abused or misused privilege in the Bill of Rights.

Should journalists be permitted to assassinate a person’s character under the guise of free speech?

Brian Green

Augusta

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Retired Army
17512
Points
Retired Army 06/17/12 - 06:26 am
2
5
Well said Brian. Been saying

Well said Brian. Been saying that to this editorial staff for years. Shading the truth to fit a personal agenda does NOT serve this community. Manufactured divisiveness never does.

And, to those of you who can and will point out that the Chronicle does allow me to post my opinions here remember this. My prolifigate posting is paid for with money that I have honestly earned and effort on my part.

The Chronicle can and does charge those of us who want to participate. I support the paper with my subscription dollars for both print and electronic.

Conservative Man
5305
Points
Conservative Man 06/17/12 - 08:25 am
3
0
HELLO!!

Hello people...it's called OPINION...look it up!..Sylvia writes an OPINION column as does the editorial page.....sheesh!!
I'm sure if you agreed with their opinions you'd be singing their praises not griping about their positions.....

Gage Creed
15819
Points
Gage Creed 06/17/12 - 04:08 pm
0
3
"Shading the truth to fit a

"Shading the truth to fit a personal agenda does NOT serve this community. Manufactured divisiveness never does." Given the source, these statements are laughable.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs