Perks hook lawmakers

  • Follow Letters

Referencing Steve R. Smith’s letter April 28 (“Put term limits on Congress”), I fully agree with his premise concerning the need for term limits for our legislators, but for very different reasons.

His argument seems to be based on the physical effect upon the members of Congress simply by the stressful nature of the job, resulting in a decreased ability to function effectively over a long period.

I feel, on the other hand, that most legislators soon become enamored of the lavish perks afforded them while in office and after retirement, and seeking to perpetuate their time in office becomes their primary goal – often to the detriment of enacting good legislation. Earmarks promoted by lobbyists are a prime example, resulting in reciprocal campaign contributions from the rewarded contractors as well as votes from an appreciative constituency.

The system is carefully constructed and solidly entrenched to ensure its continued existence, as long as term limits are not imposed. Certainly, enacting fair and wise laws under a barrage of arm-twisting lobbyists is a daunting task, but considering the members-only parking spaces, elevators, dining rooms, exercise facilities, tennis courts, special airport amenities, generous salaries with annual cost-of-living adjustments, great health care, retirement and death benefits for their survivors – and the unique prestige that comes with it – the job surely takes on a very desirable aura.

Term limits would change all of this drastically, upsetting the very structure of the lobbying business and eliminating much of the incentive for frivolous spending as well as allowing legislators the freedom to concentrate on the issues from a more objective point of view.

A less stressful environment for Congress members, as suggested by Mr. Smith, would, of course, be another obvious advantage.

Terry Bedell

Appling

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
copperhead
1035
Points
copperhead 05/01/12 - 01:29 am
1
0
PERKS???? these folks are

PERKS???? these folks are entitled to everything they can get! $1400/month auto lease is small payment for the sacrifices these poor folks make for the citizens!

JRC2024
9063
Points
JRC2024 05/01/12 - 09:45 am
0
0
While I do not have any

While I do not have any wealth envy or the need to feel important I do think Mr. Bedell's letter has alot of merit. The job of an elected "public servant" should not entitle them to a lifetime of perks during or after they leave office.

allhans
23752
Points
allhans 05/01/12 - 06:37 pm
0
0
Several years ago I went

Several years ago I went along with a "friend" and a SC lawmaker to dinner in Charleston.
The seafood restaurant we went to had a long waiting line. The congressman went to the door, showed the person his ID and we were escorted in and seated. Perks ! They take full advantage.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Fire closes Broad Street

Several downtown streets are closed as firefighters continue to put out a fire that began early this morning in a Broad Street building.
Search Augusta jobs