What's our future in space?

  • Follow Letters

Fifty years ago Monday, John Glenn became the first American to orbit Earth.

Our nation’s space program has been a source of pride and prestige for our country. Some of the accomplishments of our program have not been duplicated by any other country. We have landed men on the moon, developed a unique space transportation system, explored the planets of our solar system and gazed at galaxies light years away.

But now our nation’s space program is at a dangerous crossroad. Economic times are hard and budgets are tight. Granted, since the end of the Cold War, there is no longer the urgency to fund the space program along 1960s lines. We won the space race. But space program naysayers criticize the money spent on space exploration as wasteful. One has to look at the facts to debunk this. NASA’s budget is one-half of 1 percent of the federal budget. Its 2012 budget of $18.7 billion would operate the Department of Health and Human Services for a little over one week (the Obama administration has recommended a 7 percent decrease in the 2013 budget).

NASA now has to compete with other nations. The United States now partners with its Cold War rival. The United States and Russia share the responsibilities for the operation of the International Space Station. The entrance of China into the manned spaceflight arena has changed the complexion of space exploration. In 2003, China joined Russia and the United States in becoming the third nation to successfully launch a manned spacecraft. Last November, the Chinese conducted a mission that could lead to the establishment of a manned orbital laboratory. The Chinese plan a manned lunar landing by 2025.

How can our nation reignite the spirit for space exploration? We must have leadership from Washington. The White House is responsible for establishing responsible specific goals within an identifiable time period. President Kennedy did so with setting a manned lunar landing goal by the end of the 1960s. President Reagan called for an orbital space station by the 1990s. President George W. Bush established a return to the moon by the year 2020 only to be cancelled by the Obama administration. The only specific objective set by the Obama administration is the use of manned spacecraft developed by private companies to commute to the space station. Congress could aid by establishing a fixed, workable budget in which necessary program development could be maintained.

Perhaps most importantly, the exploration of space affects us in a spiritual sense. Robert Browning wrote that “a man’s reach should exceed his grasp.” Exploration is good for the soul, for it challenges us. Humans excel when working toward seemingly unreachable goals. Imagine what new discoveries would be made and the new technologies that would be developed as we expand our presence.

The Chinese have made their plans clear and have the resources necessary to attain them. Are we willing to go to bed under the light of a Chinese moon?

Henry Quinn


Comments (5) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Fundamental_Arminian 02/21/12 - 09:17 am
The heavens are the LORD's

    The heavens are the LORD's heavens, but the earth he has given to the children of man (Psalm 115:16 English Standard Version).

There's nothing practical or worthwile to spending vast sums of money on space exploration. Granted, our society reaped some benefit from technology developed for lunar missions, but the missions were much too costly (besides, technological strides are still being made despite NASA's end).

The Chinese are better positioned than we are pay for lunar travel; after all, they're reaping interest from loans we must repay for our foolish undeclared wars. But there's still nothing to be gained from a lunar landing, not even militarily.

So what if China sets up a lunar missile base. Missiles launched from 240,000 miles away would take a day to reach us and would require elaborate heat shields to successfully enter our atmosphere. As for life on Mars, the climate would be far more hostile and dangerous than life in Antarctica.

We ought to be working to improve life in the place God has given to us--planet Earth. To attempt an invasion of the heavens for sake of national prestige is nothing but foolish pride--a very costly, foolish pride.

bjphysics 02/21/12 - 09:56 am
bdittle 02/21/12 - 11:38 am
But we are still exploring

But we are still exploring space... we have many probe missions reaching into deep space as well as solar missions. Places where a human cannot be sent. Not sure what the point of spending billions upon billions of dollars to send another American to the moon serves other than a nice ego stroke. Besides, there are private companies offering rides to space very soon. I've been told by many of you that privatization should be the goal for every government endeavor.

sconservative 02/21/12 - 03:57 pm
I spent 10 years in USAF

I spent 10 years in USAF Space Systems and supported humans in space. The technology for unmanned space is such that humans need not go into space - certainly not to explore or operate in hostile environments. I assure you that any capability of escaping the Earth when we have thoroughly polluted it will be reserved for politicians and military leaders - not for us!

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs
Top headlines
New CEO of AUMC focusing on improving patient safety and satisfaction
New AU Medical Center CEO Lee Ann Liska has "truly hit the ground running" in her first two months and is already planning sweeping changes to improve patient safety and satisfaction, Augusta ...