Campaign finance 'reform' has made the system more corrupt

  • Follow Letters

This is not about the performance of sitting or past presidents – they should all be given due respect. This is about how we the people have allowed our union to degrade into a work-for-cash economy when it comes to politics in general and the presidency specifically.

In their infinite wisdom, elected officials passed “campaign finance reform” that let the cash-for-votes genie out of the bottle. Super-PAC? Does “PAC” stand for “purchase a candidate?” It is a source of unlimited campaign financing with absolutely no control. I understand that under the rules established by the reform that a PAC is totally independent, and a PAC and a candidate can have no communication.

Who are they trying to kid? Why should rational, free-thinking voters believe that a PAC is anything but business as usual, but without oversight?

Just look at the dollars spent in Florida: $44 million through Jan. 30. Who benefits? Broadcast and associated advertising industries. What’s the local impact? Nausea from all the ads, but very little economically.

Change the law! Eliminate the PACs; limit contributions to some reasonable value, one time from an individual only (no corporate money), with full disclosure; or find a way for the federal government to directly fund presidential races and the states to fund congressional races.

Also, make sure employers can’t give employees gifts to be used solely as donations for a candidate. Think that’s a stretch? Guess again. It’s happened in the past.

Our system of political finance is out of control. We have candidates who made their fortunes and are spending them on their campaigns, exactly the same way as those from Wall Street, whom we are now condemning, made their fortunes. Our current political system is driven by the Golden Rule: Those with the gold rule.

I sincerely doubt that our Founders had that in mind.

Fred Simmons

Aiken, S.C.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
faithson 02/03/12 - 12:44 am
Now here is a subject WE can

Now here is a subject WE can all get behind. It behooves each and everyone of us to educate ourselves about this and work for common ground to find a solution. Can WE put aside our partisanship and make real consequential reform happen ? It will take protagonists rising above their own self interest to make it happen.

carcraft 02/03/12 - 06:37 am
Yes, McCain and Fiengold

Yes, McCain and Fiengold campaign finnance reform. Note it has the coveted label of "bipartisan" and was going to correct the problems with to much money in campaigns..LOL Just like Obama's health care bill is going to reduce the cost of health care! Reagan was right, the scarest words in the world " I'm from the government and I'm here to help you"!

Bizkit 02/03/12 - 12:37 pm
McCain-Feingold was modified

McCain-Feingold was modified to the Shays–Meehan HR Blah, blah, blah, which was a good law. Unfortunately the Supreme Court neutered it because of our freedom. Sometimes the price of freedom is high.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs