A monumental challenge

No dialogue, just anger and argument; is this really the best we can do?

It’s been 152 years since the end of the Civil War. Maybe it’s time for a reconciliation commission.

 

Leaving behind a bloody, divisive, racially charged past while still living among reminders of it was always going to be a delicate matter. But at least we’re doing it in the worst way possible! No meaningful dialogue, just angry confrontation. And, in the case of Charlottesville, Va., injury, death and reopened wounds.

Seriously, is this the best we can do?

First, let’s just all agree that the fringe white supremacy kooks, particularly the one who murdered a protester in cold blood with his car, don’t speak for anyone but themselves. Just as homicidal jihadists don’t speak for peaceful Muslims. And, as one commentator noted, they are definitely fringe: Despite weeks of publicity to protest the impending removal of a Robert E. Lee statue, the neo-Nazis and others only attracted a few hundred to Charlottesville.

That, of course, was several hundred little weekend Nazis too many. And what utter Einsteins – protesting the dishonoring of America’s past by flying the flag of our sworn enemy from World War II. Brilliant.

President Trump’s forceful, principled statement condemning the violence on Saturday did, it must be acknowledged, fall short. It might have sufficed for any other president – and, indeed, it was much stronger condemnation than was issued by President Obama after a black racist sniper killed five in Dallas last year.

Yet, infamous former KKK leader David Duke highlighted Mr. Trump’s special challenge when he tweeted to Trump that he needs to remember that it was “white Americans who put you in the presidency.”

As South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham remarked, “These groups seem to believe they have a friend in Donald Trump in the White House. I don’t know why they believe that, but they don’t see me as a friend in the Senate and I would urge the president to dissuade these groups that he’s their friend.”

The president tried on Sunday and Monday, belatedly.

Likewise, we’ve been more than a little tardy in trying to reconcile competing, often raging, beliefs and emotions concerning our Civil War legacy – which was the flashpoint of Saturday’s tragic violence. Imagery of the Confederacy understandably remains hurtful to many African-Americans, while others believe just as strongly that purging the landscape of the past is a mistake.

Can there be any accommodation here, short of steamrolling each other? A century and a half later, isn’t it time we tried?

Charlottesville Mayor Mike Signer asked Sunday, “How do you reconcile public safety and the First Amendment?” Maybe with civil discourse.

In the meantime, we need to do a better job of separating the combatants. Charlottesville police have come under justifiable criticism for not doing more to come between the warring factions this weekend – after knowing the incendiary mixture was coming for weeks.

We’d also suggest that perhaps it’s time for authorities in such situations to not only separate combative elements by distance, but also by time: Maybe it’s time to require that counter-protests take place at a different hour or day than competing protests.

As a legal website notes, “the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that state and federal governments may place reasonable restrictions on the time, place and manner of individual expression. … To pass muster under the First Amendment, TPM restrictions must be content-neutral, be narrowly drawn, serve a significant government interest, and leave open alternative channels of communication.”

We believe such cauldrons as the one in Charlottesville apply.

 

More

Tue, 11/21/2017 - 23:53

Letter: Virus must be quarantined

Tue, 11/21/2017 - 23:53

Letter: Urgent: Press your rights

Tue, 11/21/2017 - 23:53

Editorial: Bottom Line

Tue, 11/21/2017 - 23:53

Editorial: ‘Fair-weather feminists’