Ripe for reform

Veterans act should have included fixes to corrupted civil service

  • Follow Editorials

The $16-plus-billion emergency fix for the scandal-plagued Department of Veterans Affairs is
designed to do a lot of things.

President Obama - flanked by Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., (left) and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland (right) - signed the Veterans' Access to Care Through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014 at Fort Belvoir, Va., on Aug. 7. The bill is meant to give resources to the Department of Veterans Affairs to improve care for veterans. But it won't solve many other VA problems.  JACQUELYN MARTIN/ASSOCIATED PRESS
JACQUELYN MARTIN/ASSOCIATED PRESS
President Obama - flanked by Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., (left) and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland (right) - signed the Veterans' Access to Care Through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014 at Fort Belvoir, Va., on Aug. 7. The bill is meant to give resources to the Department of Veterans Affairs to improve care for veterans. But it won't solve many other VA problems.

It is intended to help hire more doctors and nurses; build more VA facilities; and make it easier for veterans to get health care from non-VA providers.

What it won’t do is start to
reform a culture that rewards liars, punishes whistleblowers and shields itself from scrutiny with a bureaucratic brick wall.

That would require the ability to quickly and easily fire bad employees, which this recently approved bill doesn’t do.

“Throwing money at the VA won’t solve their problem,” said U.S. Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan. “A fundamental change in culture and real leadership from the president on down is the only way to provide the quality, timely care our veterans deserve.”

The media have ballyhooed provisions enabling the VA secretary to immediately terminate senior executives – an authority new Secretary Bob McDonald should have anyway. But the measure signed recently by President Obama does nothing to streamline the termination process for the VA’s rank-and-file civil service employees.

As many as 1,000 veterans may have died while languishing on secret waiting lists at VA facilities nationwide, including in Augusta. Considering the depth and breadth of the scandal, one would assume at least some mid- to low-level employees also should be held to account.

After all, the falsified and omitted records and cover-ups that led to the preventable veteran deaths – and $100 million in pay bonuses for VA administrators over a three-year period – clearly bear the fingerprints of federal employees at multiple pay grades.

Reforming the VA requires overhauling its employee culture, from the top down and the bottom up.

Yet, as Military Times reports, fewer than 500 of the VA’s 380,000 employees are covered by the bill’s streamlined termination
and discipline provisions. And even then, “it’s unclear whether they face any real threat to their jobs.”

It’s also unclear whether the VA has fired anyone in this scandal. Before the appointment of former Procter & Gamble CEO McDonald as VA secretary last month, the agency said it “might” discipline six officials, whom it declined to name, and that only two of them could be fired.

Remember, this is an agency whose inspector general found falsified wait times at 70 percent of its facilities.

A wholesale house-cleaning might be just what the doctor
ordered.

“If you’ve been in an organization that’s failed across the board the way the VA has, the writing is on the wall and probably a lot of the senior people have to go,” Todd Henshaw of the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business told Stars and Stripes. “(McDonald is) going to need some people coming in from the outside.”

An old saying goes that it’s impossible to fire a federal employee for anything less than murder. So what would you call it when a veteran dies from the willful withholding of medical treatment to which he is entitled?

And what about the fact that performance bonuses were linked to these deaths?

Honestly, where’s the accountability?

Sadly, it’s not found abundantly in the VA reform act. Any terminated “senior executive service” employee – or equivalent medical professional – still would have seven days to appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board, which in turn has 21 days for an expedited adjudication. The MSPB’s decision to retain or terminate is final.

That’s only slightly better than the existing appeals process, which can take months to resolve, but far too cumbersome when compared to the termination process in the private sector – which consistently delivers better outcomes at lower costs than government health care.

The private sector fires employees at six times the rate of government, which in 2013 terminated just .049 percent of workers, according to the Office of Personnel Management.

The civil service laws Congress enacted decades ago to protect employees from politically motivated firings has created a job-for-life system that serves the interest of the federal bureaucracy, not the general public.

If a government worker is deemed a poor performer – a designation that itself is subject to interpretation – the onus for improvement is put on the organization rather than the employee.

Even when misconduct – not performance – is the cause for action, employees still are entitled to lengthy due process and a period of administrative leave. All of this generates paperwork and confrontation. Most managers try to avoid that.

And even when managers take a termination to the furthest level, there’s always the chance the MSPB will overrule their decision.

This is a big reason why IRS employees can harass conservative groups; Secret Service agents can hire prostitutes; and General Services Administration employees can treat themselves to a lavish Las Vegas conference with near-impunity.

More often than not, career government employees get
reassigned or demoted, or are
allowed to retire – almost anything but terminated.

“I actually think the federal workforce would be better off with more firing,” Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute told CNN. “The good workers get disheartened and demoralized if they see these nonperforming workers making as much as them and they’re not doing their job.”

If lawmakers are serious about reform, they should change the way government employees are evaluated, promoted and disciplined. And they should start at the VA, where decisions by government workers literally can be a matter of life and death.

Otherwise, the $16 billion VA bill is nothing but a reward for failure, and it’s only a matter of time before the next scandal arises.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
deestafford
27412
Points
deestafford 08/17/14 - 08:36 am
3
0
Don't hold your breath...

Don't hold your breath expecting any changes in policies relating to terminating civil service employees. They are a more protected species than any animal on the endangered species list.

dsterling9
823
Points
dsterling9 08/17/14 - 10:09 am
4
0
WRONG APPROACH

How can our government continue to throw money at problems when our nation is so in debt? Especially when nothing is being done to correct the REAL problems. There needs to be a change in policies and attitudes before any real change can come about. Too many civil service employees are too well protected and others are afraid to say anything. STOP SPENDING AND START DOING!

dahreese
4717
Points
dahreese 08/19/14 - 09:06 am
0
0
"An old saying goes that it’s
Unpublished

"An old saying goes that it’s impossible to fire a federal employee for anything less than murder. So what would you call it when a veteran dies from the willful withholding of medical treatment to which he is entitled?"

To the Editor; I'm aware that I've been blocked and that your readers do not read my posts. As to whether you, the editors, read them, I don't know either.

Be that as it may, since you are concerned about the deaths of veterans, what do you call it when these veterans have been sent into needless wars?

You could, but won't, write a marvelous editorial about that and send a lot of deserved blame at Obama.

And after him, George W. Bush.

Your real concern should be about sending American troops into needless wars in the first place.

But, you aren't about to write such a murderous editorial, are you?

Young Fred
17448
Points
Young Fred 08/23/14 - 04:56 am
0
0
This is so illustrative

of government agencies at all levels!

A problem is outed, after many times, years of malfeasance; and the statist along with their lackeys in the main stream media holler for more money and only superficially address the root problems.

As pointed out above, the root problem is an ingrained culture. This ingrained culture is a malignant cancer that affects a majority of gov't agencies.

Note, I said "majority", I didn't say all. I also said malignant, which means the precious few agencies that do their job well, and the many more who are barely adequate (the ones who strive for mediocracy), are in dire danger of contracting the cancer that so infects much of our agencies.

Our gov't many times come up with great ideas on how to address particular problems faced by their electorate. The problem is with the mind set, and work ethic, of those they charge with carrying out the solutions. And the problem is with the lack of consequences to those charged with implementing.

There is rarely consequences.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs