Hit and run

Deputy's firing was justified; blow to the head was not

  • Follow Editorials

There is disagreement in some quarters over precisely what happened when a white sheriff’s deputy struck an already prone and straddled black Augusta teen Aug. 3.

But there can be little doubt that it was a severe violation of departmental policy – and monumentally imbecilic to boot.

We can’t see that Richmond County Sheriff Richard Roundtree had any choice but to fire the deputy, as he did Monday.

Roundtree – the county’s first black sheriff – is reportedly firm in his belief that the incident wasn’t racial. As one source told us, the department believes the fired officer, Brian McDuffie, would’ve lashed out without regard to race, after the youth ran from the scene of a reported burglary in progress.

Still, with 15-year-old Kyvan James being black and McDuffie being white – and with the nation’s current racial climate, post-Trayvon Martin – you had to know the least whiff of impropriety by the officer could become an open sore.

What horrible judgment for an officer to put himself in that position, and to put the community’s race relations at that kind of risk.

On the strength of that
hideous lack of prudence alone, the officer’s job must be in play.

We don’t for a minute buy the canard that Trayvon Martin was some kind of innocent victim. But that’s the narrative that’s been sold in most of the media, and it is sure to infect incidents such as these across the breadth of the nation.

Indeed, young Mr. James reports having feared becoming another Trayvon.

Again, we believe that fear, while quite real, is sadly misguided. Trayvon Martin’s shooter was not a trained and uniformed officer. And in the Augusta case, all evidence indicates James had nothing to do with the crime the deputies were investigating.

The boy’s family says he ran from the scene out of such fear. As we have already noted, that was the evening’s first mistake.

Yet, in that combustible atmosphere, for a 260-pound white officer – the second officer on the boy’s back, no less – to take a gratuitous shot with a flashlight at the head of a 100-pound prostrate and partially-cuffed black teenager? That’s just insane.

Some, fueled by new claims by the fired officer, are arguing that the young man – who, again was underneath the first deputy – was casting about frighteningly close to the officer’s gun. They’re saying that justified McDuffie’s blow to James’ head.

But according to our source, McDuffie never made such a claim to his own sheriff’s department investigators – and he had several chances. Our source also says neither McDuffie nor the first officer to light upon the young man reported feeling threatened in any way by him.

Officers, our source says, are taught early on that the use of an “impact” weapon such as a baton or flashlight is reserved only for times of a life-and-death struggle. The reason: Such weapons can cause serious injury or death.

In racially charged cases, they can do even more damage.

In this case, however, neither officer reported feeling such a threat.

In short, just as there’s no reason to believe Kyvan James was put-upon because he’s black, there’s no evidence the officer was fired because he’s white.

Comments (57) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Darby 08/16/13 - 12:01 am
"Am I just rotten to the very core, OR very

misunderstood ??"

Rotten to the core?? Probably not. You are certainly NOT misunderstood.

On the other hand, there is little doubt that misunderstand. Just about everything!

Darby 08/16/13 - 12:04 am
"I may not agree with the rest of your

comment, but the part that I did copy says a lot !!" @ bledsoe at 4:25pm.

And every syllable wrong and misguided.

Darby 08/16/13 - 12:13 am
"Are neighbor watch people supposed to

carry, and use, a weapon that is two or three levels more leathel (sic) than the perp ??!!"

Yes, absolutely, without a shadow of a doubt. What's your solution? Oh, I know. Disarm the neighborhood watch so that if there is a confrontation, we can be sure that there is a "fair fight".

How dumb would that be? Why not just turn the neighborhood over to the thugs?

But your question begs the point... How was Zimmerman to know that the man attacking him didn't have an Uzi or a Mac 10? Ask him perhaps?

paladin5 08/16/13 - 04:35 am
Riverman1 Wins......

Riverman1, you summed it purty good. One thing my partners will always understand....The Story will be the facts and the Truth as I see and know them...No Compromise. My Integrity will go to the Grave with me. I once had a Battalion Commander that advised me to Always maintain my Integrity when backed into a corner; the Short Gain of any Compromise would seem doomed when the Truth became known, and the burden of hiding the Truth can have consequences in many ways.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs